Catturd is from Florida. Gassy is from Florida.
Has anyone seen them in the same room together?
POLITICAL THREAD
- Thread starter kybobcat
- Start date
Has anyone seen them in the same room together?
Catturd is awesome though. And also.
FREE GASSY!
FREE GASSY!
Makes sense because they provide zero value whatsoever. Companies' productivity will also increase. Win/win.
I don't see how it's hard to reconcile both stances. Easy for me to be both tough on crime and want the government to be properly restrained by the constitution. Surprised, but not surprised, that you can't see how both can be true.
Ahhh so I was only half wrong lol
The more things change, the more they stay the same. This isn't some new problem
If they gut their DEI departments, who’s going to do their February social media posts or preorder the rainbow graphics for June?
Lefties aren’t going to know where to shop.
Someone in the comment called this tweet 'creed thoughts' @Creed Bratton
The Pope has deleted the tweet and changed from middle finger to third finger:
Edit: the third finger tweet has now also been deleted as well...tough day for whoever is running the Pope's twitter account.
The Pope has deleted the tweet and changed from middle finger to third finger:
Edit: the third finger tweet has now also been deleted as well...tough day for whoever is running the Pope's twitter account.
Last edited:
Horseshoe theory. Average people don’t care, just those who are very engaged politically. The far left and right.
Hah. “Freedom” of religion for Christians and cults but not Muslims. What a take. Should be expected from this cesspool I guess but even y’all being that brazenly hypocritical and bigoted is surprising.
I sure miss Gassy Knowls. What did he do to get banned?
So it shouldn’t be covered by the First Amendment. Since it isn’t a religion. You say that’s a “big difference”. Sounds good to me. 👍
BREAKING: Hunter Biden Asks Joe Biden's Asst. AG, Delaware AG and IRS to Go After Individuals Close to President Trump Who Shared Information from His Laptop | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft
Hunter Biden is asking the Federal Government and the aware AG to go after individuals who shared personal information from his laptop. Hunter Biden is going after John Paul Mac Isaac, Rudy Giuliani, his attorney Robert Costello, Stephen K.www.thegatewaypundit.com
It was no longer his laptop at that point. Abandoning property does not allow you to retain possession. He left it there. Refused to pay for it. Refused to claim it. It's now passed out of his custody and belongs to someone else.
Unfortunately for him, it is also part of an investigation and the contents of the laptop were made available to the public by the person with whom he abandoned it while it was not yet in the possession of the authorities.
If he's allowed to sue anyone for looking at a device he abandoned, what's to stop people from suing the government for all of the gum they left under bus seats and railings all over NYC? Are the police going to be sued for capturing crimes on tape because they looked at them or let others see them in court? Lol
We as a people need to sue the federal govt for not prosecuting HC, JB, HB, etc for known crimes they committed like espionage and treason, as well as destroying evidence, being in possession of and distributing classifed documents without the authority to do so, etc. The agencies have failed to uphold their oaths and do their jobs. They should be forced to pay back double what they were paid while on the job and surrender any additional funds and property they received during and/or as a result of their activities.
The 1st Amendment has nothing to do with my relationship with Jesus Christ. It is a personal decision and no government on earth no matter how many amendments they pass or strike down can change that.
I am grounded in my faith and even if the U.S. took away all of our Bibles like communist / socialist / Muslim countries do I would still have my faith. Man or government can not take that away. There are many people like me in China and even Cuba and Iran. It is a personal relationship. They worship God with the threat of death but they continue to worship .
Sounds good. Will the rest of the thread join us in removing Christianity from First Amendment protections as it apparently isn’t a religion? Clears this whole cake thing right up.
Exactly.
This is an interesting issue actually. (Not forcing people to bake cakes, but the freedom of religion issue)
There has been a push over the last 50 years to only protect freedom of religion as a "right" for those whose religion is recognized by the government. The constitution doesn't mention the gov as ultimate arbiter of what is and isn't a religion, however. I have a friend that I did bible study with years ago whose religion is not officially recognized by the gov. Over 100k people that espouse it, but still not a religion according to the US GOV.
I would understand not recognizing Islam because of its political nature that is firmly "anti" to any other religion and against any secular government at its core. That is not compatible with the laws and organization of our republic. It never has been and can't be. Allowing it, outside of government, sure, but allowing its adherents to hold office is counter to the nation itself.
There are religions that are not opposed to secular govt, that don't espouse anarchy or deception, and that can co exist within and without undermining a republic. Yet, the gov does not recognize them, while recognizing those that directly oppose this nation's structural foundation exactly as described at the beginning of this paragraph.
What this "new normal" is going to require is everyone standing up against it AND for all religions that support the freedoms/rights that the country was founded upon, even if it means supporting a religion that you don't agree with on every point. Is that still possible to defend when the govt as it exists now is OPPOSED to its own foundation?
When all else fails or you don't have a valid argument, there's always the race card.
Putting words in my mouth. I didn't say anything about removing the 1st Amendment protection. I said it did not have a thing to do with my faith. I support it but if your group has it removed someday I will continue to have a personal relationship with Jesus Christ and serve Him. Christianity is not built on man's laws. it is a personal relationship.
Read the Gospels for the reasons I believe what I believe. They are very easy to understand.
Told me he was taking some time off to celebrate black history month 🍺
One is in response to getting caught. The other is a perspective on government intrusion. Sometimes interests overlap. When liberals realize they cannot count on law enforcement that has been ravaged by liberal policies, people realize they want guns. And, not guns with the lowest amount of rounds in the clip, but they want what they can legally get. When there is a threat to the kids’ school, they want more protection at the school. Philosophical arguments are good when the subject is someone else.
Lol...I was watching a little bit of this. The hissy fit from the dems is glorious.
Let me check my calendar Sawnee 😂🍺
So it's OK for a boy to impersonate a girl & play against them, but it's not OK for a woman to play against girls. When democrats get their way This is the kind of mess that they make.
Apparently, Jan, feb, mar, apr, may, june, july, aug, sept, oct, nov & Dec.
She represents her constituents well. Total phony. As lunatic left as her squid of 4 (not a typo) that ooze and creep out of the traps their traps set for them
The First Amendment only applies to religions though and you clarified @BC_Wader’s comment that Christianity wasn’t a religion, it’s “a personal relationship with Jesus Christ.” You even stated that’s a “big difference.” If it isn’t a religion it isn’t covered.
Also this one who has always been unhinged also got in on the action:
And with AOC it's all silly pathetic optics...like when she put her hands behind her back like they had handcuffed her.
They are so entertaining. I actually enjoy watching them rant and rave. And of course we have Miss Kamala. She doesn't rant or rave she just acts like a child and addresses adults like they are in pre-school.
AOC is nothing more than an influencer that was installed in Congress. It's the only explanation. We know Dems don't let anyone run unless they're handpicked. They definitely don't get to win without their help.
It's really the only explanation
It's really the only explanation
Chronological age is apparently still Science.
