Not if you have her on ignoreAnd, one sentence from an aspiring historian exponentially dropped the collective IQ of the thread. Congrats.
Not if you have her on ignoreAnd, one sentence from an aspiring historian exponentially dropped the collective IQ of the thread. Congrats.
That the right's coming for our rights? Yeah. As it's always been.Abortion was protected under Roe v. Wade.
You catching on yet?
Pubs lost a lot of committee seats due to the failures of DT's preferred Senate candidates & Dims having a majority now. Leader MM had to pick everyone to lose something. It's why hardly anyone wants his job.Mike Lee, Rick Scott lose key committee seats; Scott blames McConnell
Republican Sens. Mike Lee of Utah and Rick Scott of Florida were removed from the Senate Commerce Committee as the new Congress gears up, Fox News Digital has learned.www.foxnews.com
SC, all Pubs lost committee seats. Dims now have the majority. Not sinister. Look it up. It is politics. So of course it's a game.Mitch McConnell getting some payback so he eliminates two strong conservatives. That is the game he plays.
Good Lord. And you have the balls to call Trump supporters a cult. Mitch could shoot your mother in front of you...and you would blame Trump for it.SC, all Pubs lost committee seats. Dims now have the majority. Not sinister. Look it up. It is politics. So of course it's a game.
Doesn't matter what sex you think they are, you can't discriminate based on that. Sorry.Being a tranny and going through surgeries associated with that is a “personal health decision”. Does not change the fact they are immutably the sex they were born.
I don't disagree. However until SCOTUS changes their minds, it's currently constitutional as long as they comply with the notice/advertising requirementsRoadblocks are a straight up constitutional violation. They were able sell this on an emotional basis and succeeded in getting enough people to support safety over freedom.
its a really stupid legal loophole. SCOTUS ruled that drug search roadblocks were illegal but breathalyzer ones were legal. But you can legally turn around at an alcohol roadblock and not submit to it. None of it makes any sense.Roadblocks are a straight up constitutional violation. They were able sell this on an emotional basis and succeeded in getting enough people to support safety over freedom.
Five will get ya 10 he's engaged in "peaceful protests".Lol you’re a goddam lunatic. Maybe I’ll buy you a cake that says “everyone who disagrees with my insanity is a white Christian and I hate them”.
I shake my head when people actually think Christianity is a religion.Pretty obvious they have Christianity Derangement Syndrome
Reminds me of DUI (DWI?) checks. Announce a couple of days in advance when and where they will be.
'Saturday on Rt. 25 between 10pm and 1am.'
Is that just an Ohio thing or in other states too? Kind of defeats the purpose.
Back in the days when I was running around in the mid-1980s and even into 90s, I can remember at 2-3 times running into unannounced roadblocks sponsored by the KSP. At least I don’t think they were announced; this was obviously back in the days before the internet and social media.They are legally required to publicly announce the time and location of planned checkpoints. That sounds absurd on it's face, but when you think about it, you are being temporarily detained by law enforcement for no reason. Otherwise they need legal justification to stop you
At the KSP roadblocks I ran into back in the day, they would have one patrol car straddling the middle road, and one patrol car parked on the shoulder in each direction; with a total of at least three state troopers working the roadblock. It pretty much sent a message to not even turn around to evade the roadblock because they would obviously jump in one of the parked cars and pull you over to find out why you decided to turn around.its a really stupid legal loophole. SCOTUS ruled that drug search roadblocks were illegal but breathalyzer ones were legal. But you can legally turn around at an alcohol roadblock and not submit to it. None of it makes any sense.
Boo Hoo. She might reconsider marriage with siblings. Meanwhile..Omar gets shit on constantly around here. Called a dirty traitor and worse. But then linked when she says something critical of establishment Dems...
Just don't ask Ron Klain that questionWith all the TDS we see in culture and on this thread, who can honestly answer this:
Who appears to have been the better parent to their children, Joe or Donald?
When Hunter is paying Joe a huge money laundering rent, Joe had to think Hunter was brilliant. Joe just had to provide the stage and, evidently, the documents.What are:
Given Hunter is a predator, on the level of Weinstein, why did China Joe say he was the "smartest person I know"?
Why has the leftwing corporate uniparty media given Predator Joe a pass on these issues?
Answer: questions you won't hear in the "news"
Back in the days when I was running around in the mid-1980s and even into 90s, I can remember at 2-3 times running into unannounced roadblocks sponsored by the KSP. At least I don’t think they were announced; this was obviously back in the days before the internet and social media.
I know currently here in the Evansville area, I occasionally hear of publicized DUI roadblocks. Personally I don’t know why they would have to be required to give advance notice.
That misinterpreting the Constitution isn’t a source of rights. As you well know.That the right's coming for our rights? Yeah. As it's always been.
I'm not aware of a requirement that road blocks be announced in advance. Maybe some states have that requirement, but I don't believe the Supreme Court decision requires that.Might've been before the constitutional challenge. Not sure when the case was decided.
I still run into them in rural areas without hearing notice. I assume they publicize it somewhere but I'm just not there to listen to local radio. Other times I do hear the postings.
I'm not aware of a requirement that road blocks be announced in advance. Maybe some states have that requirement, but I don't believe the Supreme Court decision requires that.
My first job out of law school was as a public defender. It is usually liberal activist types who object to checkpoints and other arguable 4th Amendment violations, so it is weird to see the arch-conservatives on here making these arguments.
What are:
Given Hunter is a predator, on the level of Weinstein, why did China Joe say he was the "smartest person I know"?
Why has the leftwing corporate uniparty media given Predator Joe a pass on these issues?
Answer: questions you won't hear in the "news"
EXCLUSIVE: The Bidens "Fixed" Crimes by Corrupt Actors for a Fee - Hunter Made $1 Million for Connecting Chinese Actor with US Attorney | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft
The Biden crime family made millions off the family name in pay-for-play schemes for several decades. The Bidens likely committed several crimes including espionage. The Gateway Pundit reported this week on several likely criminal actions documented on Hunter Biden’s laptop computer.www.thegatewaypundit.com
So you deny Pubs had to reduce their number of members on committees?Good Lord. And you have the balls to call Trump supporters a cult. Mitch could shoot your mother in front of you...and you would blame Trump for it.
I'm not aware of a requirement that road blocks be announced in advance. Maybe some states have that requirement, but I don't believe the Supreme Court decision requires that.
My first job out of law school was as a public defender. It is usually liberal activist types who object to checkpoints and other arguable 4th Amendment violations, so it is weird to see the arch-conservatives on here making these arguments.
Catturd is closest thing we now have on here to Gassy Knowls:
Good Lord. And you have the balls to call Trump supporters a cult. Mitch could shoot your mother in front of you...and you would blame Trump for it.
Hunter Biden finally admits infamous laptop is his as he pleads for criminal probe
The revelation came in a petulant letter from Hunter Biden’s lawyers seeking a criminal probe into what they called, attempts to “weaponize” its contents.nypost.com
Friends, I invite you to read this newsletter to learn about several issues I am working on for Kentuckians. If you're short on time, here's a top line summary of some of my activities in January:
|
Rep. Massie Tells Tucker Carlson a New "Church Committee" is Happening | |
|
Tucker Carlson of Fox News suggested forming a new “Church Committee" modeled after the Senate select committee that investigated abuses by U.S. government agencies in the 1970s. Speaker Kevin McCarthy made this happen. I’ll serve on it, and we will go wherever the evidence leads us. The formal name for the new "Church Committee" is the "Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government." Members of the select subcommittee will look into egregious acts of the federal government that suppress the civil liberties of Americans. I also appeared on the Fox Business channel to discuss the Select Subcommittee with Kennedy. |