ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%
  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
Pubs lost a lot of committee seats due to the failures of DT's preferred Senate candidates & Dims having a majority now. Leader MM had to pick everyone to lose something. It's why hardly anyone wants his job.

But poor, poor Scotty. Have to feel for him over all other Pubs Senators who lost seats. I mean he did just a stellar job running the RNC Senate campaign from his vacation in Europe.
 
Being a tranny and going through surgeries associated with that is a “personal health decision”. Does not change the fact they are immutably the sex they were born.
Doesn't matter what sex you think they are, you can't discriminate based on that. Sorry.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: DocPT
Roadblocks are a straight up constitutional violation. They were able sell this on an emotional basis and succeeded in getting enough people to support safety over freedom.
I don't disagree. However until SCOTUS changes their minds, it's currently constitutional as long as they comply with the notice/advertising requirements
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mash 2.4 and blubo
Roadblocks are a straight up constitutional violation. They were able sell this on an emotional basis and succeeded in getting enough people to support safety over freedom.
its a really stupid legal loophole. SCOTUS ruled that drug search roadblocks were illegal but breathalyzer ones were legal. But you can legally turn around at an alcohol roadblock and not submit to it. None of it makes any sense.
 
Reminds me of DUI (DWI?) checks. Announce a couple of days in advance when and where they will be.
'Saturday on Rt. 25 between 10pm and 1am.'
Is that just an Ohio thing or in other states too? Kind of defeats the purpose.

They are legally required to publicly announce the time and location of planned checkpoints. That sounds absurd on it's face, but when you think about it, you are being temporarily detained by law enforcement for no reason. Otherwise they need legal justification to stop you
Back in the days when I was running around in the mid-1980s and even into 90s, I can remember at 2-3 times running into unannounced roadblocks sponsored by the KSP. At least I don’t think they were announced; this was obviously back in the days before the internet and social media.

I know currently here in the Evansville area, I occasionally hear of publicized DUI roadblocks. Personally I don’t know why they would have to be required to give advance notice.
 
its a really stupid legal loophole. SCOTUS ruled that drug search roadblocks were illegal but breathalyzer ones were legal. But you can legally turn around at an alcohol roadblock and not submit to it. None of it makes any sense.
At the KSP roadblocks I ran into back in the day, they would have one patrol car straddling the middle road, and one patrol car parked on the shoulder in each direction; with a total of at least three state troopers working the roadblock. It pretty much sent a message to not even turn around to evade the roadblock because they would obviously jump in one of the parked cars and pull you over to find out why you decided to turn around.
 
What are:
Given Hunter is a predator, on the level of Weinstein, why did China Joe say he was the "smartest person I know"?
Why has the leftwing corporate uniparty media given Predator Joe a pass on these issues?

Answer: questions you won't hear in the "news"
When Hunter is paying Joe a huge money laundering rent, Joe had to think Hunter was brilliant. Joe just had to provide the stage and, evidently, the documents.
 
Back in the days when I was running around in the mid-1980s and even into 90s, I can remember at 2-3 times running into unannounced roadblocks sponsored by the KSP. At least I don’t think they were announced; this was obviously back in the days before the internet and social media.

I know currently here in the Evansville area, I occasionally hear of publicized DUI roadblocks. Personally I don’t know why they would have to be required to give advance notice.

Might've been before the constitutional challenge. Not sure when the case was decided.

I still run into them in rural areas without hearing notice. I assume they publicize it somewhere but I'm just not there to listen to local radio. Other times I do hear the postings.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ukalum1988
Might've been before the constitutional challenge. Not sure when the case was decided.

I still run into them in rural areas without hearing notice. I assume they publicize it somewhere but I'm just not there to listen to local radio. Other times I do hear the postings.
I'm not aware of a requirement that road blocks be announced in advance. Maybe some states have that requirement, but I don't believe the Supreme Court decision requires that.

My first job out of law school was as a public defender. It is usually liberal activist types who object to checkpoints and other arguable 4th Amendment violations, so it is weird to see the arch-conservatives on here making these arguments.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Girthang
I'm not aware of a requirement that road blocks be announced in advance. Maybe some states have that requirement, but I don't believe the Supreme Court decision requires that.

My first job out of law school was as a public defender. It is usually liberal activist types who object to checkpoints and other arguable 4th Amendment violations, so it is weird to see the arch-conservatives on here making these arguments.

Some people call those "who object to checkpoints and other 4th amendment violations" - "constitutionalists"
 
What are:
Given Hunter is a predator, on the level of Weinstein, why did China Joe say he was the "smartest person I know"?
Why has the leftwing corporate uniparty media given Predator Joe a pass on these issues?

Answer: questions you won't hear in the "news"

Or in congressional investigations... fbi investigations....
 

That is why the fibs are gathering the docs from his home and offices, so they can bury the evidence as deep as they did from the Epstein case.
 
I was thinking about how it's always the left who are the ones who just change and boast of this stance. It's never the right.

Example

The left is the one who suddenly started putting pronouns in their bio. They never did this before two years ago. Conservatives never did and still don't.

The left is the one who publicly talks about getting vaccines and put it on social media. You never saw conservatives do this and the left didn't do this until COVID.

The left is the one who put Ukraine flags in their bios/profiles. You never saw this from anyone until the left did this. Not like you saw conservatives just put a different country's flag up.

The left is the one who pushes masks and now acts as if it's a religious symbol you must adhere to. Never mind that no one in our lifetimes ever did that but now conservatives are "bad" if they don't do it despite it not working.

There are a lot of examples but it's just humorous to me that this group thinks they're not brainwashed despite collectively jumping on whatever the latest directive they're told.
 
Last edited:
She was a Republican. Probably more liberal terrorism.




Like I said, it's war, and we're the only ones that don't know it yet.

They talk about right wing extremism and label conservatives as terrorists so that THEY can shoot up congressional softball games, gun down whistleblowers and republican officials, and corrupt gov agencies SO THAT they can bury the evidence against them while Republicans are trying to prove they aren't extremists and terrorists. The Republicans KNOW they are doing this and are just looking out for their own positions and wallets instead of truly going after anyone.

When the election was stolen, they stole the country.
 
I'm not aware of a requirement that road blocks be announced in advance. Maybe some states have that requirement, but I don't believe the Supreme Court decision requires that.

My first job out of law school was as a public defender. It is usually liberal activist types who object to checkpoints and other arguable 4th Amendment violations, so it is weird to see the arch-conservatives on here making these arguments.

Looks like I remembered wrong. The details only have to be recorded and noted, not announced. Although I do know they announce them at times, for whatever reason.

Your view of liberal and conservative is just bizarre. You're surprised conservatives are opposed to state intrusion on one's life?
 
  • Like
Reactions: SDC8888
Lake posted on Twitter yesterday (I didn't see this posted here) examples of the nearly 40k fraudulent ballots (and that's just the ones where the signatures don't match those of the voters listed on the ballot). It is clear to everyone the election was fraudulently conducted and manipulated, but the left is too morally bankrupt to admit it, and the congrssional right rinos got their status quo position of "our hands are tied, so we'll grandstand for a few years."
 

Here was the front page of the Post today (which was once locked out of twitter for a considerable time for reporting about the laptop):


Fn9XMsoX0AIVQlB
 
From Massie's newsletter ("Church Committee"... that name is going to make lib heads explode lol):


Friends,

I invite you to read this newsletter to learn about several issues I am working on for Kentuckians. If you're short on time, here's a top line summary of some of my activities in January:
  • Appeared with Tucker Carlson on Fox News to discuss serving on the new "Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government."
  • Joined Kennedy on Fox Business to discuss the wearable debt clock I built.
  • Introduced HR 185, legislation to end the COVID-19 vaccine mandate for international air travelers.
  • Announced my appointment to serve on the House Rules Committee.
  • Announced my appointment to serve as Chairman of the Judiciary Subcommittee on the Administrative State, Regulatory Reform, and Antitrust.
  • Introduced HR 24, legislation to audit the Federal Reserve.
  • Received a score of "A+" on the Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life scorecard.
Here are the in-depth articles:



Rep. Massie Tells Tucker Carlson
a New "Church Committee" is Happening



Tucker Carlson of Fox News suggested forming a new “Church Committee" modeled after the Senate select committee that investigated abuses by U.S. government agencies in the 1970s. Speaker Kevin McCarthy made this happen. I’ll serve on it, and we will go wherever the evidence leads us.

The formal name for the new "Church Committee" is the "Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government." Members of the select subcommittee will look into egregious acts of the federal government that suppress the civil liberties of Americans.

I also appeared on the Fox Business channel to discuss the Select Subcommittee with Kennedy.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT