I desire UK to do well competing consistently for National Championships. To accomplish this, there must be some parameters to gauge success and failure. Perhaps, a down year is round of 32 and a very good year is final 4 or better. Down years should have consequences just like good years.
I don’t care who the coach is, but the coach should produce very few down years and establish a pattern of good to great years, so the coaching results are in line with the high salary.
If this upcoming year is a down year, then there is crystal clear pattern of down years. It is difficult justifying paying a coach a very large salary, when there are thousands of coaches that could produce a pattern of down years.
Again, who the coach is doesn’t matter to me, I just want consequences for success and failures that will continue UK’s legacy as a blue blood.
Honestly other than Pitinos run, no one has been that consistent at competing for titles. Uk has had a Ton of years where they didn't sniff a final four or title, especially since 1958.
All that said,, cal needs to go..