Seven who threatened ref after Kentucky's Elite Eight loss ID'd
- Thread starter permdaddy
- Start date
I said in my opinion, several times. Higgins has not been convicted of anything, therefore you'd think you'd understand meaning and context. Oops, its you. Never mind.
you said I condoned the death threats.
Prove it, I've asked 3 times.
I really hope you never get on a jury.I can see you convicting someone based on another person's word.You have these 7 convicted without knowing anything.You are aware that no charges have even been filed?
Last edited:
Oh, one of those. Someone is only a criminal if they're caught and convicted huh? Good Lord, you get worse by the day.
Never said they were convicted. I said I hope they are punished to the fullest extent of the law. If they are found innocent, then no punishment is warranted.
Of course anyone that can read would know this so thanks for making my point.
As I said, you're a liar, and I think rather delusional. There is no post where I condoned death threats.
You can't link it because it doesn't exist.
Nap time.
People say it's just a game, because it's just a game. Universities existed long before basketball came into being. It really is just a game.
so how do you choose to believe it or not? cross check? look for more evidence? how?
not what i'm asking. so you don't believe anything or believe everything?
Nah, I don't take things as seriously as some of the psychos on this board. Thanks for the reply though.
Kansas fans should know about criminal behavior.How did you like last years team of thugs you guys had?Self wouldn't suspend them and they still choked.
you have trouble answering questions i see. haven't answered anyone's.
Really? The answer is pretty simple. No, as I never beat my wife.
See, a nice, clear and unambiguous answer. Try it for once.
Last edited:
no plan, just blowing up your point. how is questioning the truth of something wrong? based on what you just said here seems you have no problem with it. you can choose to discount something or believe it. you're saying it yourself. but some people just want to know the truth. and that's a problem?
See there you go again. I said I think that the maximum penalty is appropriate if they have caught and can convict the filth that did this. These processes are all well defined legal pursuits. Truth is a matter for religion and philosophy to debate. Guilt on the other is determined in a court room. If the guilty parties are found and convicted, I think they should suffer as much as the law allows.
See, that's not so hard. Oh, and you didn't blow up anything. You just looked foolish.
what are you even talking about? i'm not talking about punishment. i'm referring to your answer about believing everything you see and read, which is when i entered the conversation. lol
who is foolish? the court room? good lord.
Ah, so you don't know what you are talking about because you haven't read the thread.
I told you what I said. I told you where guilt or innocence is established. I don't think anything is relevant to the thread topic. I don't know what else to tell you. If you want to argue about another topic, start another thread.
Are you changing your position now? Oh that's right, you have to, because you lied. No link? Oh that's right, there isn't one, you're a liar.
I said I don't care about the "death threats" (in large part because there's no evidence). Higgins brought all of this on himself. There are crazy people in this world and he exposed himself and his family to them through his criminally natured actions against our program and players.
Try winning a meaningful game outside of your conference.
You like it here at catsillustrated don't you? Big step brothers house?
3 titles, all of them surrounded in scandal. You're a fan of the most underachieving program by far. You're a joke.
And Kansas fans talking about threats?LMAO. You ARE thug U.
Get lost.
Last edited:
I blame it all on Higgins & the Corrupt NCAA. Those idiots let him ref when even borderline retards like Kansas fans know he is on the take. If Higgins doesn't make those horrid calls, then none of this happens.
i'm calling out your argument that questioning the validity of something is wrong. was clearly referencing this from the start. sorry you can't comprehend that. and see you still haven't given an answer but just change the subject which is kind of like hiding. i don't care about your point on punishment, you have enough arguments going on with that. i'm talking about validating things. and you seem to have no problem with it even though you clearly insinuated otherwise when you said you don't discount things you don't like. fact seeking is always better than deciding what you believe with limited evidence. and you can't argue against that.
7? Are you referring to the number of transfers you all bring in every year?
Or is that arrests?
Similar threads
