The libertarian party caused me to lose faith when they decided not to attack Hillary over the email scandal. Just mind boggling
I think the rub is that it's rightly believed gross negligence would have been found for anyone else (or at least not a high ranking politician) in the same situation. So, you're right that it wasn't as simple as her having the server was immediately a felony, but it's obviously against the law based on the rules 99.9999% of the population plays by
so now trump isn't being honest either?
Maybe some people just hate politicians period. Doesn't matter if we finally have one telling his mind or not.
I think the rub is that it's rightly believed gross negligence would have been found for anyone else (or at least not a high ranking politician) in the same situation. So, you're right that it wasn't as simple as her having the server was immediately a felony, but it's obviously against the law based on the rules 99.9999% of the population plays by
Which clump are you including Condoleeza Rice, Colin Powell, and George W Bush in? (All had private email servers)
Who said he was being dishonest? I know I stated that I am not sure he can be trusted. Because that is a legitimate question about him. Can Trump be trusted? I dunno. This guy smoozed with the Clintons.
What was it that turned Trump, who is a known smoozer with the Clintons, into the anti-Clintons? What exactly made that happened? Can someone explain that to me?
Ditto. Republicans spend waaay to much themselves. For instance not like they aren't guilty of bailouts themselves. If anything libertarians are classical republicans.Libertarians are more American than the Republicans in office, Libertarians are trustworthy, Republicans not so much. That's a ridiculous statement to compare dems to Libertarians. Absolutely wrong. Considering that Libertarians are waaaay more economically conservative than Republicans without letting Jesus Christ rule on social policy.
The election has taught just how awful both parties are. Awful. Piss poor awful.
The libertarian party caused me to lose faith when they decided not to attack Hillary over the email scandal. Just mind boggling
I wish I could say the same bro
Trump already explained it. Don't confuse his honesty on the matter with the typical voters inability to understand it, or accept it.
Which clump are you including Condoleeza Rice, Colin Powell, and George W Bush in? (All had private email servers)
They no intent excuse was garbage. Short of a recorded admission, every case needs circumstantial evidence to prove intent.
Some statutes are strictly liability: speeding, statutory rape, etc. This was not.
No one (i.e. FBI Director) is saying not to use circumstantial evidence of intent; they're saying the circumstantial evidence did not lead to intent (at least gross negligence) to distribute classified information to unauthorized users. Everyone agrees she intended to have email on a private server, and almost everyone would agree she intended (or was at least grossly negligent) to have CI emails through her private server. I know I'm parsing details, but that's the point. Reasonable people can say anyone else would have been found grossly negligent, and that's the only real argument (and I'm not arguing against that).
The presidential race?Who said he was being dishonest? I know I stated that I am not sure he can be trusted. Because that is a legitimate question about him. Can Trump be trusted? I dunno. This guy smoozed with the Clintons.
What was it that turned Trump, who is a known smoozer with the Clintons, into the anti-Clintons? What exactly made that happened? Can someone explain that to me?
All you can do is vote for who you think is best for the Country.
Not sure I follow you S & C
Just saying he's already admitted to gaining the system because he could. He's already admitted he used the clintons, Bush's, numerous other politicians etc for personal gain. He's already said why he did it, and it wasn't for politically correct reasons. So why would he be lying or untrustworthy? He admits what the rest won't.
Sorry I'm not being clear I'm babysitting thirty 15 year olds this morning.
What is wrong with that? I thought those on the left liked foreigners. Silly me. Oh and by the way, don't know who was arguing earlier about someone talking about looks being a reason to get voted into office but, it worked for Obama.Heisman, I don't care if a black person, a Tranny, or a Hermaphrodite is in the White House. What I do care is, letting some broad that is a KGB spy in the White House. I love America, Trump's wife is another AnnaChapman
But I agree with Qwes. Big Russian fat fitties are a plus even if they are serving against America's best interests.
Melania: "Vlad, I valmost I have dem vere I vant dem. Get the Gulag veddy, honey, Vomma is coming vome"
Just saying he's already admitted to gaining the system because he could. He's already admitted he used the clintons, Bush's, numerous other politicians etc for personal gain. He's already said why he did it, and it wasn't for politically correct reasons. So why would he be lying or untrustworthy? He admits what the rest won't.
Sorry I'm not being clear I'm babysitting thirty 15 year olds this morning.
I would say you aren't that dumb, but you posted it, so here we areWhich clump are you including Condoleeza Rice, Colin Powell, and George W Bush in? (All had private email servers)
Despise both with a passion. I'll probably either vote Johnson or sit it out. More than likely sit it out.DeBoss..who you voting for? Do you like any of these candidates?
Clearly you have WarriorCat on ignore.
This is what most on the left do not understand. Blind allegiance is the only thing they know.Big Blue, We got Trump because people are sick and tired of the shit going on with ALL politicians.
People are mad as hell with the state of the Union.
If Trump preaches jobs and safety he's going to win the Presidency. He's going to get a lot of middle class votes that usually vote democrat.
Not happy with that either bro. I generally think the world of Johnson, but that was pure bullshit.
No one (i.e. FBI Director) is saying not to use circumstantial evidence of intent; they're saying the circumstantial evidence did not lead to intent (at least gross negligence) to distribute classified information to unauthorized users. Everyone agrees she intended to have email on a private server, and almost everyone would agree she intended (or was at least grossly negligent) to have CI emails through her private server. I know I'm parsing details, but that's the point. Reasonable people can say anyone else would have been found grossly negligent, and that's the only real argument (and I'm not arguing against that).
I mean, if theyre not going to attack her for that; then why even have their hat in the ring? Its not like its slinging mud. It was an actual thing that actually happened.
The circumstantial evidence ALL pointed to intent. The lies. The coverup. The disregard of regulations. The refusal to comply with the investigation until she destroyed everything.
Was there even one piece of circumstantial evidence that pointed to a lack of intent on her part?
I think Trumps VP pick of Pence shows he wont run a liberal administration. Mike Pence is a very good governor and I'm sure he wouldn't have joined Trumps ticket if Trump was spouting a left wing type of agenda during their meetings for VP. Who knows if Trump will be a great President, but based on his VP pick I don't see him going full lib tard.How do you know that Trump isn't doing that right now? We know Hillary is a lying sack of shit, but we honestly can't say that about Trump without using our heart to rationalize to a conclusion.
All it boils down to me is, can Trump be trusted not be a liberal?
Was the speech very similar? Absolutely. Was it plagiarism? No. Discussing hard work and trustworthiness are pretty general terms to discuss. It's not as if Michelle was the first to mention them.
Guess I don't follow you.
I think Trumps VP pick of Pence shows he wont run a liberal administration. Mike Pence is a very good governor and I'm sure he wouldn't have joined Trumps ticket if Trump was spouting a left wing type of agenda during their meetings for VP. Who knows if Trump will be a great President, but based on his VP pick I don't see him going full lib tard.
So you haven't listened to the words of the man that spent over a year with Trump helping him write his book?I don't know, but I don't believe he is.
I'm known for one sometimes lolGood point.
"I genuinely believe that if Trump wins and gets the nuclear codes there is an excellent possibility it will lead to the end of civilization," Schwartz said.
I guess I struggle with the people who say, I am not voting Trump because he may end up being a hard core left leaning liberal. I struggle because that may indeed be what he ends up being, but not voting for him guarantees you have a hard core left leaning liberal in the white house. I guess I am willing to throw my vote to the guy who may not do that, instead of conceding to the one who is exactly that.
Just my two cents