Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
YOU MADYeah, I don't see the powerful KU, Dook, or UK getting busted. It just wouldn't be beneficial for the NCAA to do it. Heck, it took a three-year investigation, cash falling out of an envelope, and players admitting to the LHL that they had gotten paid for the NCAA to do anything to UK in '89.
They also look forward to being victimized again by having Adidas golden boy Langford choose KU.yeah, but it says we are the victim. We knew nothing about it...”
but they don’t know anything about it
hey Schwagg where are the Residents KU fans mr. Burns Mr. Elliot (RC)Atleast their Bull**** streak is over & the Final Four is dust in the wind cause obviously ever game that DeSouza played in will be forfeited.
Atleast their Bull**** streak is over & the Final Four is dust in the wind cause obviously every game that DeSouza played in will be forfeited.
It looks like Marcus Garrett is the other, along with Silvio De Sousa. Garrett's already been recruited over, but De Sousa getting ruled ineligible would be a big blow to next year's team.
I don't think much will happen as far as vacating games, but there's no way those guys can play next season.
I agree with this. As a UK fan, I can't help but to be concerned that the shoe companies have been paying players for awhile, and even if we didn't know, we could be implicated if any of our players got paid. I honestly think it is naive to think none of our payers were paid. I don't think we paid anyone, but I bet someone did.
you're looking at it the wrong way. the goal of the investigation is to indict the shoe companies for defrauding universities. their view, except when a coach is proven to be involved, is that the universities are victims. this means that the ncaa more than likely probably won't really do much with the basic shoe company and aau shenanigans when the investigation wraps up.
Lol.....sorry, no. The FBI looks at Gatto as running a wire fraud and possible tax evasion scam.....which would be turned over to the IRS.you're looking at it the wrong way. the goal of the investigation is to indict the shoe companies for defrauding universities. their view, except when a coach is proven to be involved, is that the universities are victims. this means that the ncaa more than likely probably won't really do much with the basic shoe company and aau shenanigans when the investigation wraps up.
you're looking at it the wrong way. the goal of the investigation is to indict the shoe companies for defrauding universities. .
RC was banned for having a different opinion than a typical Rupp poster. Most fans of other teams get banned faster on Rupp than any other team fan board for not cheering the Wildcats. He won’t be able to comment.hey Schwagg where are the Residents KU fans mr. Burns Mr. Elliot (RC)
Word is it's Preston and DeSousa. Allegation also says KU was a victim...defrauded. So in English, that means KU had no involvement. Preston was held out when the car incident raised questions. That's called institutional control.
RC was banned for having a different opinion than a typical Rupp poster. Most fans of other teams get banned faster on Rupp than any other team fan board for not cheering the Wildcats. He won’t be able to comment.
I will say that Kansas won’t have any games forfeited. Sorry Schwaggy.
So in English, that means KU had no involvement.
Not necessarily. The charges against U6 say the same thing even though an assistant supposedly knew and was on tape discussing it. It can be honest services fraud against the university as a whole if a member of the staff knew, but also a serious NCAA violation.
RC was banned for having a different opinion than a typical Rupp poster. Most fans of other teams get banned faster on Rupp than any other team fan board for not cheering the Wildcats. He won’t be able to comment.
I will say that Kansas won’t have any games forfeited. Sorry Schwaggy.
Question: If Gatto, Addidas et al only are being charged with paying the parents, is it an NCAA violation regarding the kids eligibility?
Absolutely false. Tarheel board banned posters for what they said about UNC on this board even though they didn't post on the Tarheel board.
Yep. UNC Board and Duke Board check your posting history before they approve your request to post.
That inherently means that U6 had involvement. Arizona also had involvement through their assistant coach Book Richardson. They don't release incomplete allegations.
Like UL, if the players got paid, they are no longer amateur athletes. Regardless if Kansas knew, they were ineligible and would have to at least forfeit the games they played in.
UNC and Kentucky boards - both not very tolerant, okay. I read what RC posted. He was banned because he said Cal’s NCAA tournament record should include 0-1 for UMass and 0-1 for Memphis for the seasons that were vacated by the NCAA. Your board does not allow criticism of any type of your coach from fans of other schools.Absolutely false. Tarheel board banned posters for what they said about UNC on this board even though they didn't post on the Tarheel board.
The legal theory of the charges is that the University was defrauded of honest services of players, and in some cases coaches, by taking money or doing something else that was inconsistent with their obligations to the university.
So for legal purposes the university is a victim, for NCAA purposes it may be complicit because of what the coaches did.
UNC and Kentucky boards - both not very tolerant, okay. I read what RC posted. He was banned because he said Cal’s NCAA tournament record should include 0-1 for UMass and 0-1 for Memphis for the seasons that were vacated by the NCAA. Your board does not allow criticism of your coach from fans of other schools.
Na, heard RC was sent to San Quentin after hammering some chickens while shrooming.RC was banned for having a different opinion than a typical Rupp poster. Most fans of other teams get banned faster on Rupp than any other team fan board for not cheering the Wildcats. He won’t be able to comment.
I will say that Kansas won’t have any games forfeited. Sorry Schwaggy.