KU/Adidas paid players; FBI files more charges
- Thread starter JFCats22
- Start date
Sadly nothing will happen to KU. Just read it, and the FBI report lists Kansas as the “victim” and specifically states that the rep intentionally concealed the payments from Kansas so they would not be aware.
That is what the NCAA will note, and nothing will happen.
It would never fill up ,,,, Kanas sucks to Hard !
Unless it was Kentucky, then it would be "strict liability."
And you can hear the Rug Doctor now , but but they were all good kids and could speak seven languages and should be eligible to play right away !! How about that Jailhawks!!!
I believe you actually meant "grossly selectively incompetent".
That’s because it was an ocean once. Google Oceans of Kansas and you’ll see a whole different Kansas.
Wrong. You can't play a player who has received an improper benefit, whether you knew about it or not. And the rules were tightened to cover parents after the Cam Newton fiasco. Memphis lost a season because Rose apparently cheated on his SAT. Memphis didn't know, Cal didn't know. But the cheating made him ineligible. Jackson was paid to play. That's still an NCAA violation.
Kansas themselves may not be punished per se, but the NCAA has shown that they’ll vacate games if a player has been proven ineligible, which if his parents took 30k, he was. They may have to vacate the season even if technically the school isn’t “punished”. I’d take a minus 30 or however many wins they had that year in the all-time wins race.
Heck 55,
Do it correctly. THEN you know they will not miss your message...
@KneeBurns
@Nooneputsbabyinacorner
@TexasJayhawk1959
@TexasHawk10
@RC_Texas
Bam supposedly got loan before he committed to UK, and 90K to Josh Jackson to go to KU. Also, it makes sense that if Bam did get money, which he denies, it wouldn't have been to go to UK, since Cal and Miller have zero relationship and we aren't an Adidas school. Unlike KU.
Last edited:
The indictments refer to a player that committed to Kansas on or about August 30, 2017. I've been told that would be Silvio DeSousa.
I always Wondered about that kid who was a UK lock and picked UCLA out of the blue. Shabazz Muhammad was his name and UCLA was/is an Adidas school.
It's really not that difficult to actually read the probe and the articles. Awfully misleading. It states that Adidas paid them, not the coaches.
With that said, I can't wait for the Nike schools to be released. I already know 1K did a great job hiding it though.
With that said, I can't wait for the Nike schools to be released. I already know 1K did a great job hiding it though.
The NCAA didn’t take that stance with Cal did they? He had no knowledge of anything yet they vacated a final four. Your school has its day coming...
We will know when Self holds him out for violating team rules for a couple games and then makes up some other bullshit excuse only to see him end up playing in Pakistan or some other place with Lamelo.
Trying to be fair to the NCAA:
The Justice Department has previously stated that the NCAA should NOT pursue any action pertaining to allegations uncovered by the FBI until conclusion of the case.
Sooooooo....about a year or two for this to end, another year for the NCAA to decide to act, another year to actually investigate, a year for appeal of any NCAA action.
I guess we find out in about a half decade.
The Justice Department has previously stated that the NCAA should NOT pursue any action pertaining to allegations uncovered by the FBI until conclusion of the case.
Sooooooo....about a year or two for this to end, another year for the NCAA to decide to act, another year to actually investigate, a year for appeal of any NCAA action.
I guess we find out in about a half decade.
Yeah if kids got paid, they would be ineligible regardless of the Dr. Rug knew or not.
Some people are so blinded by their fandom that they don’t care anything about facts. TheBlueDisciple is the biggest KU fan apologist here and only shows up to defend all things KU.
I think we are HOPING if Bam DID get money it was to go to NCState. In reality, the only evidence is a line on a ledger right now.
Time will tell.
Time will tell.
Well, as far as I've read, this was done totally without KU's coaches involved. But with Loserville, it seemed to implicate coaches. The question for the NCAA will be "did any coach push Gatto to make this happen". Vacated wins for Kansas - yeah probably, just like us with Bam, but further punishment - don't think so unless coaches are directly involved (pitino)
