Stuff Not Being Talked About Much:
(1) Why Russia might not want a “long” war.
Ukraine has a city nicknamed “rocket city” where many of the Soviet Union’s nuclear missiles were designed and built. Ukraine has many nuclear power plants and plenty of fissionable materials.
Yeah, Ukraine signed an agreement in the 90’s to give up nuclear weapons and we and the Russians agreed to respect their borders.
Now Russia has invaded.
Umm. Talk about one-sided and propaganda...
Do you know what was also agreed to in the 90s, or did you not read all of the Wikipedia post about it? NATO and the US making a huge investment and physical presence in the country is not "respecting its borders," nor respecting the agreement.
It's like approving of the slaughter of native Americans because people wanted land, as a legit reason to break treaty after treaty.
How many weeks would it take for Ukraine to develop intermediate range nuclear tipped missiles capable of hitting Moscow and St. Petersburg?
How long to produce 100 of them?
They have the minds, the materials and the motivation. Their maternity wards, kindergartens and residential neighborhoods are being hit. How long would we stand by without resorting to what would be a huge game-changer?
Russia best find a way out of this war in 90 days!!
Looks like Russia planned a way into and out of this from the beginning and people just refuse to acknowledge it.
When they "surrounded" cities they were harangued as incompetent for not doing it completely, but the civilians fled through the gates they left open. The media promoted it as if the UA was maintaining humanitarian corridors, when their forces were hiding in schools and theaters using civilians and civilian areas as their shields.
Then media then promoted that the UA and its azov battalion (nazis to the media 2 years ago, but now miraculously heroes) were somehow like the US patriots in the revolutionary War, fighting with guerrilla style tactics... Except they aren't. Our patriots didn't use civilians and civilians homes as shields. They were still out and away from settlements when they did their fighting. They just used the rural terrain against the red coats. Media spin that an owl couldn't keep up with.
Russia said they didn't care about Kiev early on. Media said they did and that they wanted to take the capital. Then the Russians "surrounded" part of Kiev and the media foamed at the mouth. Oops, but then the Russians moved away from Kiev without doing much damage. Now "they must be defeated, yay! They didnt get Kiev!"
The problem with being on the media teets is that it makes people look stupid and they don't have any clue as to why.
(2) Why China is standing behind Russia . . . as far behind Russia as they can get.
China signed an agreement in 2013 guaranteeing that Ukraine was protected by their nuclear umbrella!
“
China pledges unconditionally not to use or threaten to use nuclear weapons against the nuclear-free
Ukraine and
China further pledges to provide
Ukraine nuclear security guarantee when
Ukraine encounters an invasion involving nuclear weapons or
Ukraine is under threat of a nuclear invasion,” a joint statement on the pact said.
Headlines in the Chinese Communist Party-affiliated state media noted the accord, including a People’s Daily headline that stated, “
China offers
Ukraine nuclear umbrella protection.”
Whoops!!
Russian President Vladimir Putin’s order raising the alert status of Russia’s massive nuclear forces this week in the midst of an invasion of neighboring Ukraine is presenting a test of a 2013 agreement that calls on China to provide a nuclear deterrent umbrella for Kyiv.
www.google.com
Interesting that the only possible reason mentioned that China hasn't said much is JUST the media narrative. No other possible reason? Never even thought about it? Why is that?
Have you considered that China doesn't want or trust any NATO or any US presence in Ukraine?
You mention the agreement (or the portions that suit the narrative anyway) but stop short of justifying China's lack of action against Russia that is clearly their responsibility as part of said agreement. Why? Have you even thought about it independent of what your media is telling you? China is BOUND to act, yet hasn't.
Could it be that CHINA of all countries, China that kills its own people and steals the world's tech and intellectual property, is actually waiting to see what Russia does before jumping to suggested conclusions, while Americans have lost their collective minds to blood lust? How ironic would that be?
What if Russia told us it was a humanitarian mission, but it WAS actually a humanitarian mission? Maybe they feigned a takeover to make sure they'd meet their other objective, and to allow the world to see the machinations of European and US media. Great possible story, but no one is telling it. Why?
If you're not asking these questions, are you completely programmed or just not interested in whether the information you receive is right or wrong? Has convenience dulled our wits entirely?
What will everyone do if Russia just leaves Ukraine after this? It's what they said they were doing. Their story hasn't changed yet.
When/if it does, and they storm in with real weapons and eliminate the population, taking over the country, then you can claim justification, enlist yourself, and go to war. Right now, however, all of the hatred and battle cries, the one-sided arguments, the name-calling and character assassination over the loss of another corrupt pawn says more about you than anyone that refuses to jump to conclusions.
