The only accusation you can hurl at Roy based on actual findings is that he was naïve. He has said thousands of times over he has never micromanaged kids' classes, at UNC or KU. He actually trusted the system during a faculty driven academic scandal. He has a 40 year track record of treating everyone with class and doing things the right way.
And the venom spouted both here and with Dook fans to literally destroy him and his reputation is remarkable. You believe what you want to believe.
UNC fans despise Calipari because they feel better by believing he's a cheater and a sleeze to the core, when facts and history largely absolve him. Is it even possible for diehard fans to hold off judgement and focus on facts?
To paint a picture of Roy as a man of corruption & exploiter is easy to do when you don't know him. It just takes some rival groupthink. If actual facts arise tied to Roy directly re: the scandal, or anything else, I won't defend him. Joe Paterno is a reminder that no one is untouchable. But I'll never understand why any sports fan is hellbent on destroying a man's reputation when 99% don't know ****. That goes beyond just a sports rivalry. Guess 'innocent until proven guilty' just isn't as fun as venomous speculation.