GoP getting the important work done! Lmao. Like anyone thought those clowns would do any real governing.
This cake case does specifically have to do with a CO law, but yes there's the possibility of SCOTUS ruling on some aspects of that CO law in 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis. Will be interesting to see how that one goes and the limits of the ruling since all they took up was the freedom of speech clause and not the freedom of religion clause. Or if they eventually take up Phillips's case on appeal assuming the CO SC affirms the CO appellate court decision.It is when SCOTUS rules. The Colorado Court of Appeals hardly sets the law of the land. This is far bigger than Colorado.
It's not a coincidence we're talking about cake, food. Sustenance required to live. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 made it illegal to refuse service based just on who someone is. Their race, color, national origin, religion, or sex. Age, disability, and veteran status were added later. This means a town cannot all get together and decide they won't sell food or housing to black people and thereby effectively ban all black people from their town. No one is being forced to create, they're only being forced to provide equal service to all if they choose to provide a service.Out of curiosity, why do you think anyone should forced to create anything for anyone else?
You can throw out a platitude like that but it doesn't make it true. Some businesses, mostly in rural areas(especially in the South), would be lauded by their local populations if they refused service to transgender people. They would be more successful, not less. Your free market isn't the solution to every problem.If society believes the business is wrong, the business will die.
So your sentence contains several different issues.Do you believe an artist should be forced to paint something against their closely held beliefs?
Some Dems votes yes, but not a single Repub voted no. Tells you all you need to know. I guess you think this administration doing some real governing? You are the type of voter they love. Uninformed and goes along with whatever they say. Some people call it useful idiots.GoP getting the important work done! Lmao. Like anyone thought those clowns would do any real governing.
I did. Because no, Affirmative Action is not the same as a lynching. And you’re disgusting for arguing/thinking that. Par for the course around here.
Dion claims that before the baker knew for what the cake represented, the baker agreed to bake the cake. Does anyone here think the trans person was not noticeable as a person from the Alphabet community to the baker? The baker was not discriminating against the person, but refused only when the baker concluded the baker would be celebrating what his religious beliefs view as sin. The baker was attempting to avoid being part of the sin. Baking a cake for a trans person was not objectionable. Participating in sin was. Dion will not respect the distinction, but for those who seek God, it is patent.That's what he's saying. The rights of the trans outweigh the rights of the baker. Listen to Dion, "it was just a pink and blue cake". What would the next one be? This entire situation is just another ruse to create a problem where none existed.
“Bake me a cake that celebrates the fact that God made them man and woman, and marriage is a sacrament between a man and a woman.”So if a male Christian walked into an atheist tranny cake shop and said bake me a cake to celebrate my baptism into the Christian faith, that tranny atheist has to make it by law?
False.Christianity is most certainly a religion, the most practiced religion in the world in fact. Sure, you can be a Christian without belonging to or going to a church or particular denomination. But that has nothing to do with whether Christianity is a religion.
Following the lead of the White House.GoP getting the important work done! Lmao. Like anyone thought those clowns would do any real governing.
Facts and truth are things libs do not understand and do not want to understand. It goes against their agenda.Schiff led this country into 4 years of turmoil because of his repeated lies that he had seen credible evidence of Trump colluding with Russia. Were you asleep or just didn't watch the news? Santos is an asshole but he screwed his district and his voters. Schiff screwed the country and in hindsight... the free world. We are facing ww3 largely on the lie that Trump colluded with Russia. WW3 seems like a much bigger cause and effect than some freshman congressman lying about his background because our very own president has done the same thing dozens of times.
The excuse given by Biden was it would harm human life if it was shot down. The thing is flying over one of our largest states in land mass and one of our most rural states. It is not like you are shooting it down over New York City.So USCG tracking a Russian intelligence vessel off Hawaii and now China has a spy balloon in Montana? Awesome.
Looks like @vhcat70 and CCP errand boy Milley told Biden not to shoot it down.
However, I’ll give you credit VH on McCarthy. So far he’s not been half bad.
https://www.khon2.com/local-news/uscg-partners-tracking-russian-vessel-off-hawaiian-coast/amp/
https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2023/02/02/politics/us-tracking-china-spy-balloon/index.html
If that was Don Jr's. Laptop and all of the crimes committed were his and his dads, they would both be in Gitmo already.Can you imagine the MSM and left wing firestorm if it was Don Jr’s laptop instead of Hunter Biden’s?
After all the hand wringing over Trump, we now have an actual criminal in the WH and nobody seems to even give a damn about it.
I think you're the one who is deflecting. Not everything should be excused with "whataboutism". Santos is a disgrace.Facts and truth are things libs do not understand and do not want to understand. It goes against their agenda.
So they deflect. They point to the lies of some two bit congressman from New York and totally ignore what lies Shiff created and lies from the Commander In Chief every day of the week. Did you know Biden had a son killed in Iraq?
I grew up in a Southern Baptist church and am now a Presbyterian. I have never heard of people in those churches "frowning upon" Catholics or considering Catholicism a separate religion from Christianity. Is this a return to the 1950s when it was thought Kennedy was unelectable because he was a Catholic?There are multiple different translations of the Christian Bible, additional scriptures not recognized by most Christians, and religions like Catholicism are frowned upon by a lot of modern day Christians.
I would throw him out of congress if I had a say and I hope the people of New York do the same.I think you're the one who is deflecting. Not everything should be excused with "whataboutism". Santos is a disgrace.
Schiff should be investigated and I think will be and we will see what happens after that. Biden is not in Congress and so no I would not support his impeachment for lying.I would throw him out of congress if I had a say and I hope the people of New York do the same.
Now would you remove Schiff and Biden for their lies? I didn't think so.
The Chinese are sending a signal to the world they can humiliate the U.S. and Biden will do nothing about it.
He initially agreed and then later in the phone call she said it was celebrating a transition. He then changed his mind and refused service after learning that.
If Santos broke a law I want him indicted. I would vote to remove him by sundown today. He is not good for the image of the GOP or congress. But I guess if they removed every liar in congress they wouldn't have enough members left to call a forum.Schiff should be investigated and I think will be and we will see what happens after that. Biden is not in Congress and so no I would not support his impeachment for lying.
Santos created his entire persona. We don't even know his true life story. His case is unique. I doubt he will be removed unless he is indicted.
Schiff should be investigated and I think will be and we will see what happens after that. Biden is not in Congress and so no I would not support his impeachment for lying.
Santos created his entire persona. We don't even know his true life story. His case is unique. I doubt he will be removed unless he is indicted.
Santos is a lot like Biden. Liars. It’s not debatable. Joe and George have each been caught in numerous ridiculous lies. It’s who they are. I am not sure how it would invalidate one but not the other.Schiff should be investigated and I think will be and we will see what happens after that. Biden is not in Congress and so no I would not support his impeachment for lying.
Santos created his entire persona. We don't even know his true life story. His case is unique. I doubt he will be removed unless he is indicted.
I believe it was a whacky tweet from Taylor Greene.Just within the past couple days a democrat member of the House was ranting about another member taking about “Jewish space lasers”.
If someone could please find me a quote from a Republican talking about Jewish space lasers which the democrat is referring to, that would be great.
If not, please chalk up another damaging democrat lie on the floor of congress which is far worse than guys like Biden, Santos, etc. lying to people who are dumb enough to vote for them.
I believe it was a whacky tweet from Taylor Greene.
I’d like to see the Jewish space lasers quote.
Someday the tide will violently turn on these evil twisted perverts.
I would like to buy a catturd shirt if they are out there.
The image of a mass murderer. I would guess our taxes paid for them.
![]()
Say your an easy sloot without saying your an easy sloot.The image of a mass murderer. I would guess our taxes paid for them.
![]()
This requires a long answer, I'll get to it later at work.This cake case does specifically have to do with a CO law, but yes there's the possibility of SCOTUS ruling on some aspects of that CO law in 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis. Will be interesting to see how that one goes and the limits of the ruling since all they took up was the freedom of speech clause and not the freedom of religion clause. Or if they eventually take up Phillips's case on appeal assuming the CO SC affirms the CO appellate court decision.
It's not a coincidence we're talking about cake, food. Sustenance required to live. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 made it illegal to refuse service based just on who someone is. Their race, color, national origin, religion, or sex. Age, disability, and veteran status were added later. This means a town cannot all get together and decide they won't sell food or housing to black people and thereby effectively ban all black people from their town. No one is being forced to create, they're only being forced to provide equal service to all if they choose to provide a service.
You can throw out a platitude like that but it doesn't make it true. Some businesses, mostly in rural areas(especially in the South), would be lauded by their local populations if they refused service to transgender people. They would be more successful, not less. Your free market isn't the solution to every problem.
So your sentence contains several different issues.
1) forced: what do you mean by forced? We've mostly been talking about the Jack Phillips cake cases wherein he's never being "forced" to bake a cake. He's always free to close his shop and not sell cakes if he has a serious moral/religious conviction. I would assume the same in your artist's case. Literally forcing him to do it, at gunpoint or whatever, is wrong obviously.
2) paint: So this is an interesting case study as painting is usually subjective right? The value depends on the viewer. If you're talking about an inherently creative unique original work there's a strong argument that that's speech and hence protected. But if you're talking about painting a room in your house yellow there's also a strong argument that that's routine commercial work and not speech. Either way that's a compelled speech issue that goes directly to the freedom of speech clause in the First Amendment and would have to be litigated to find the boundaries.
3) against their closely held beliefs: You can refuse service to anyone for any reason that isn't one of the listed protected conditions. So their closely held belief would have to be discriminating against a legally protected class, which is why the cake case is so interesting as he's claiming it's his Christian right to discriminate against gay and transgender people. I agree with the courts that both "the act of baking a pink cake with blue frosting does not constitute protected speech under the First Amendment," and "that CADA’s prohibition against discrimination based on a person’s transgender status does not violate a proprietor’s right to freely exercise or express their religion." That covers both the freedom of speech and the freedom of religion(free exercise) clauses. So they have to follow the CO state law(CADA).
![]()
Duke's Lawson says men's ball used in FSU game
Duke coach Kara Lawson said the teams played with a men's basketball for the first half of a loss to Florida State on Sunday.www.espn.com
How did she know it’s a men’s ball?
Is she a biologist?