The image of a mass murderer. I would guess our taxes paid for them.
![]()
This belongs with my previous post.
**what the hell is that behind her?
The image of a mass murderer. I would guess our taxes paid for them.
![]()
Say your an easy sloot without saying your an easy sloot.The image of a mass murderer. I would guess our taxes paid for them.
![]()
This requires a long answer, I'll get to it later at work.This cake case does specifically have to do with a CO law, but yes there's the possibility of SCOTUS ruling on some aspects of that CO law in 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis. Will be interesting to see how that one goes and the limits of the ruling since all they took up was the freedom of speech clause and not the freedom of religion clause. Or if they eventually take up Phillips's case on appeal assuming the CO SC affirms the CO appellate court decision.
It's not a coincidence we're talking about cake, food. Sustenance required to live. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 made it illegal to refuse service based just on who someone is. Their race, color, national origin, religion, or sex. Age, disability, and veteran status were added later. This means a town cannot all get together and decide they won't sell food or housing to black people and thereby effectively ban all black people from their town. No one is being forced to create, they're only being forced to provide equal service to all if they choose to provide a service.
You can throw out a platitude like that but it doesn't make it true. Some businesses, mostly in rural areas(especially in the South), would be lauded by their local populations if they refused service to transgender people. They would be more successful, not less. Your free market isn't the solution to every problem.
So your sentence contains several different issues.
1) forced: what do you mean by forced? We've mostly been talking about the Jack Phillips cake cases wherein he's never being "forced" to bake a cake. He's always free to close his shop and not sell cakes if he has a serious moral/religious conviction. I would assume the same in your artist's case. Literally forcing him to do it, at gunpoint or whatever, is wrong obviously.
2) paint: So this is an interesting case study as painting is usually subjective right? The value depends on the viewer. If you're talking about an inherently creative unique original work there's a strong argument that that's speech and hence protected. But if you're talking about painting a room in your house yellow there's also a strong argument that that's routine commercial work and not speech. Either way that's a compelled speech issue that goes directly to the freedom of speech clause in the First Amendment and would have to be litigated to find the boundaries.
3) against their closely held beliefs: You can refuse service to anyone for any reason that isn't one of the listed protected conditions. So their closely held belief would have to be discriminating against a legally protected class, which is why the cake case is so interesting as he's claiming it's his Christian right to discriminate against gay and transgender people. I agree with the courts that both "the act of baking a pink cake with blue frosting does not constitute protected speech under the First Amendment," and "that CADA’s prohibition against discrimination based on a person’s transgender status does not violate a proprietor’s right to freely exercise or express their religion." That covers both the freedom of speech and the freedom of religion(free exercise) clauses. So they have to follow the CO state law(CADA).
![]()
Duke's Lawson says men's ball used in FSU game
Duke coach Kara Lawson said the teams played with a men's basketball for the first half of a loss to Florida State on Sunday.www.espn.com
How did she know it’s a men’s ball?
Is she a biologist?
Also, I hate to ask, is that a replica of her Vajayjay hanging on the wall behind her?The image of a mass murderer. I would guess our taxes paid for them.
![]()
Hey @Dore95, you said earlier you don't want Biden impeached for his lies, So Where's the line with Biden? How much more of this type of corruption needs to be unveiled before you go, yeah, he's a corrupt POS and needs to be impeached?![]()
Hunter's Business Partner Eric Schwerin Moved Joe Biden's Documents from White House to UDel - Not the Only Time Schwerin Handled Government Docs | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft
Hunter Biden’s business partner and President at Rosemont Seneca, Eric Schwerin, was reportedly in charge of the transfer of Joe Biden’s documents to the University of aware. This is the same guy TGP reported on two days ago who was involved in transferring classified information to Ukraine...www.thegatewaypundit.com
Impeachment is a bad look and its' all for show. It was bad with Trump and it would be bad for Biden. You could get into a cycle of the minority party impeaching the sitting president every time power changes hands, because there are always claims of corruption, lies, etc.Hey @Dore95, you said earlier you don't want Biden impeached for his lies, So Where's the line with Biden? How much more of this type of corruption needs to be unveiled before you go, yeah, he's a corrupt POS and needs to be impeached?
😂
A little out there for sure, but no where does she mention Jewish space lasers.
That's MTG you dope. She went on a 10 minute antijew rant in 21 over how they are destroying Christmas. Talked about Jewish lasers 3 times. She tweeted in 2019 a long rant about how space lasers cause the wildfires.Just within the past couple days a democrat member of the House was ranting about another member taking about “Jewish space lasers”.
If someone could please find me a quote from a Republican talking about Jewish space lasers which the democrat is referring to, that would be great.
If not, please chalk up another damaging democrat lie on the floor of congress which is far worse than guys like Biden, Santos, etc. lying to people who are dumb enough to vote for them.
chinese invasion coming any day now! build your trenches!
Nothing to see here. They were just scouting out a good, defensible location for the construction of a new Imperial Palace. They will love us like their own children. You'll see, it will be utopiously glorious!The only real question is what information was sought?
That's MTG you dope. She went on a 10 minute antijew rant in 21 over how they are destroying Christmas. Talked about Jewish lasers 3 times. She tweeted in 2019 a long rant about how space lasers cause the wildfires.
I don’t see anything about Jewish space lasers.
Being an alcoholic isn’t a legally protected class. He’s not allowed to refuse service to her for being trans, whether you think he should be or not.If a bartender is willing to serve you a drink, then finds out you’re a mentally disabled alcoholic and refuses to enable you, he shouldn’t be forced to serve you. Same here. A baker may be willing to bake a cake, but he shouldn’t be forced to entertain the mental disabilities and fantasies of lunatics against his will.
There is a large ballistic missile base and silo in MontanaSomething is definitely off. We have every inch of everything monitored all the time with satellites and radar. No way that thing got all the way here with noone knowing.
Plus they have advanced technology including satellites themselves. No way theyd just float a balloon.
There's really only one conclusion: we knew they were sending it and agreed to let them. That's why we immediately knew it was Chinese (because I'm sure it didn't just have a Chinese flag on it) and why we didn't shoot it down.
The only real question is what information was sought?
I grew up in a Southern Baptist church and am now a Presbyterian. I have never heard of people in those churches "frowning upon" Catholics or considering Catholicism a separate religion from Christianity. Is this a return to the 1950s when it was thought Kennedy was unelectable because he was a Catholic?
Just within the past couple days a democrat member of the House was ranting about another member taking about “Jewish space lasers”.
If someone could please find me a quote from a Republican talking about Jewish space lasers which the democrat is referring to, that would be great.
If not, please chalk up another damaging democrat lie on the floor of congress which is far worse than guys like Biden, Santos, etc. lying to people who are dumb enough to vote for them.
I’d like to see the Jewish space lasers quote.
The Rothschild space lasers are right there in the post. Are you trying to say the Rothschilds aren’t Jewish? They very famously are.I know. thats the post that caused that phrase to take off
There is a large ballistic missile base and silo in Montana
The inflation quote alone, in a sane world, should ensure his defeat in the next election by a minimum of 10 points.The real news story is he actually took a question from a reporter....I didn't think his staff allowed that:
Of course he wasn't going to answer about how weak China is making him look:
Simply because there is a Colorado law doesn't mean much. People who create unique things are expressing free speech. As we know, this also touches on religious freedom. This isn't like McDonalds spitting out a Big Mac, this is a unique item created by an artist of sort. Also, while cake is edible, no one is denying the transgender food. In fact, there are plenty of other places the transgender could have had the cake made but he chose this bakery for a reason. You know that as well as I do.This cake case does specifically have to do with a CO law, but yes there's the possibility of SCOTUS ruling on some aspects of that CO law in 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis. Will be interesting to see how that one goes and the limits of the ruling since all they took up was the freedom of speech clause and not the freedom of religion clause. Or if they eventually take up Phillips's case on appeal assuming the CO SC affirms the CO appellate court decision.
It's not a coincidence we're talking about cake, food. Sustenance required to live. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 made it illegal to refuse service based just on who someone is. Their race, color, national origin, religion, or sex. Age, disability, and veteran status were added later. This means a town cannot all get together and decide they won't sell food or housing to black people and thereby effectively ban all black people from their town. No one is being forced to create, they're only being forced to provide equal service to all if they choose to provide a service.
You can throw out a platitude like that but it doesn't make it true. Some businesses, mostly in rural areas(especially in the South), would be lauded by their local populations if they refused service to transgender people. They would be more successful, not less. Your free market isn't the solution to every problem.
So your sentence contains several different issues.
1) forced: what do you mean by forced? We've mostly been talking about the Jack Phillips cake cases wherein he's never being "forced" to bake a cake. He's always free to close his shop and not sell cakes if he has a serious moral/religious conviction. I would assume the same in your artist's case. Literally forcing him to do it, at gunpoint or whatever, is wrong obviously.
2) paint: So this is an interesting case study as painting is usually subjective right? The value depends on the viewer. If you're talking about an inherently creative unique original work there's a strong argument that that's speech and hence protected. But if you're talking about painting a room in your house yellow there's also a strong argument that that's routine commercial work and not speech. Either way that's a compelled speech issue that goes directly to the freedom of speech clause in the First Amendment and would have to be litigated to find the boundaries.
3) against their closely held beliefs: You can refuse service to anyone for any reason that isn't one of the listed protected conditions. So their closely held belief would have to be discriminating against a legally protected class, which is why the cake case is so interesting as he's claiming it's his Christian right to discriminate against gay and transgender people. I agree with the courts that both "the act of baking a pink cake with blue frosting does not constitute protected speech under the First Amendment," and "that CADA’s prohibition against discrimination based on a person’s transgender status does not violate a proprietor’s right to freely exercise or express their religion." That covers both the freedom of speech and the freedom of religion(free exercise) clauses. So they have to follow the CO state law(CADA).
Being an alcoholic isn’t a legally protected class. He’s not allowed to refuse service to her for being trans, whether you think he should be or not.
It is all above my pay grade, but if it is Chinese, maybe it is a message to the rest of the world saying we are the big dog. We can do as we please and our lap dogs will do nothing.Ya but they already know most anything of interest. They own a massive chunk of Telecom industry in this country, have their own satellites, gather unfathomable amounts of data from TikTok, and own most every politician.
Can't imagine there is anything about that installation they wouldn't already know or be able to get by much more clandestine means. Floating a giant, reflective, easily visible balloon is the opposite.
It just doesn't make sense
![]()
The Rothschild space lasers are right there in the post. Are you trying to say the Rothschilds aren’t Jewish? They very famously are.