Just found out that my really great grandfather was on the roles at Valley Forge and was at Yorktown under G.W. That's pretty cool.
But what we can say is this.....because of obama care, more people are insured. Not a bad thing in and of itself, BUT it becomes a bad thing when others have to pay for it.....and because people who could not afford insurance are now insured, it only makes sense that rates must be higher than they would be if those people were not insured. Bottom line is this....those of us that could afford insurance before are now paying for those who could not afford it then to have it now.Yeah, and Trump said he was going to "Repeal and Replace" Obamacare and the first thing he introduced was 95% Obamacare just without the funding mechanism to pay for it.
What you nor anyone can answer is what insurance rates and healthcare costs would have done without Obamacare. As earlier stated rates would have continued to rise just as they have been predicted to continue to rise under Trumpcare. Meanwhile, millions were given financial protection from the number 1 cause of bankruptcy in this country...and access to better care.
I'm curious if you're going to hold Trump to the same standard that you are holding Obama?
Would you prefer higher corporate taxes or higher personal taxes?
The purpose of any tax system is to raise $X. Lower taxes in one area will always necessitate a rise in taxes in another to raise the same number of $$$. Our government already doesn't tax enough to pay it's bills. Sure, they could cut spending but how many years of history do you need to see that isn't happening? You prefer that they continue to borrow to pay their bills? What happens when interest rates rise, and you know they will and the interest on the debt becomes a larger and larger piece of the budget?
Are you joking or really that damn dense?
Just found out that my really great grandfather was on the roles at Valley Forge and was at Yorktown under G.W. That's pretty cool.
So how does lowering revenue help lower spending? Spending has been an issue for 40 years. Taxes have been cut over and over since 1981 and all it has done is increase the debt. How about doing something that doesn't increase the debt?Like most libs, you glossed over the obvious answer. The problem we have in this country is not a revenue problem, but a spending problem.
So did the other guy ever flop out his W2?
So did the other guy ever flop out his W2?
No need. I believe he does well. That was during my more confrontational period anyway. I'm enjoying the conversations now.
So how does lowering revenue help lower spending? Spending has been an issue for 40 years. Taxes have been cut over and over since 1981 and all it has done is increase the debt. How about doing something that doesn't increase the debt?
Got your logins mixed up again.So how does lowering revenue help lower spending? Spending has been an issue for 40 years. Taxes have been cut over and over since 1981 and all it has done is increase the debt. How about doing something that doesn't increase the debt?
That's an easy question to answer. I would prefer higher personal taxes. Anyone who thinks corporations pay taxes is a fool. Corporate taxes are paid by consumers through the price of the products we buy. Higher corporate taxes do not lower personal taxes, it just hides them in the price of the products we buy so we don't know how much taxes we are really paying. It's a game politicians play to make ignorant citizens think that high levels of government spending is okay because corporations are paying for it instead of citizens.Would you prefer higher corporate taxes or higher personal taxes?
The purpose of any tax system is to raise $X. Lower taxes in one area will always necessitate a rise in taxes in another to raise the same number of $$$. Our government already doesn't tax enough to pay it's bills. Sure, they could cut spending but how many years of history do you need to see that isn't happening? You prefer that they continue to borrow to pay their bills? What happens when interest rates rise, and you know they will and the interest on the debt becomes a larger and larger piece of the budget?
Don't like trumps plan..but Obama's was a disaster too...it wouldn't maintain and would eventually fold. For some reason ppl got easily fooled to think insurance and care mean the same thing...they dont. "I'm covered! What's your out of pocket? 15 grand." Or "Im covered! For a penny, but insurance equals care!" Most ppl couldn't afford their oop with Obama care...so it was the millions on the non subsidized..aka small business owners,their employees,etc who were still at risk of bankruptcy if they needed a major medical procedure...all just bc they worked. Trump was never going to do anything to the poors, those who have it still have to go to free clinics anyway bc their insurance blows, as said before they still cant afford their oop. All insurance providers started to pull out of the medicaid plans bc they were losing ass loads, bc poor ppl still dont take care of themselves and think an ER is a walk in clinic. And for younger ppl, for instance all I want is catastrophe insurance...i shouldn't be forced to buy bullshit I don't want. That's a complete joke, the government making spend my own money on something I don't want.Yeah, and Trump said he was going to "Repeal and Replace" Obamacare and the first thing he introduced was 95% Obamacare just without the funding mechanism to pay for it.
What you nor anyone can answer is what insurance rates and healthcare costs would have done without Obamacare. As earlier stated rates would have continued to rise just as they have been predicted to continue to rise under Trumpcare. Meanwhile, millions were given financial protection from the number 1 cause of bankruptcy in this country...and access to better care.
I'm curious if you're going to hold Trump to the same standard that you are holding Obama?
Threatening funding for not having trans bathrooms is okay according to the left. Threatening funding for not obeying the law and harboring criminals is an "outrage."
Just found out that my really great grandfather was on the roles at Valley Forge and was at Yorktown under G.W. That's pretty cool.
New Moon tomorrow to help you start a new year and recover from the birthday hangover.
http://dailycaller.com/2017/04/24/5...lycaller&utm_source=Twitter&utm_medium=Social
Notice this headline and you'll notice yet another code word.
"50 ‘Juveniles’ Swarm Public Train, Rob People On Board."
"Youths" and "juveniles" always gives it away especially in Oakland. But yeah, Dems will lecture white people non-stop and have you believe there's these big groups of white nationalists out getting everyone. Imagine if you leftist POS actually held these groups to a reasonable standard.
-if tariffs are bad because cost is passed to consumers...then high corporate tax rates are bad because cost is passed to consumers. Can't have it both ways kids.
Ha ha ha
![]()
The problem with your argument is that you're trying to compare empires that were built by conquest to nations that opened their arms to those who wished to come. Imposed change vs accepting change.
Change is going to happen, like it or not. Some people accept change, others fight it but change always wins. Nothing ever stays the same for very long. Technology changes things, peoples ideas change. The idea that with or without immigration that change would cease is laughable.
There is conflict in every society without exception. Open societies, closed societies, democracies and dictatorships.
The cash "given" to Iran was a small percentage of the cash owned by Iran in US banks that had been frozen here in the US. There is still $100s of millions of Iranian cash being held by the US. Been reported over and over but like always y'all want chase boogymen so you can ignore the same type deals being made by your hero.
Perhaps one day you'll realize that it's real easy to bitch about everything when you have no responsibility to take action. Easy to call China a currency manipulator and boast about all the hard line actions you would take...until reality slaps you in the face and you realize to get something, you gotta give something. Want China to help with N Korea? Gotta be nice to the Chinese and suck up. Want concessions from Iran, want to have inspectors that can observe Iran's nuclear program up close and personal? Give them back 10% of their own assets you've been holding.
Otherwise China says F you, deal with N Korea and their batshit crazy leader yourself. Iran says, want to start a 3rd war in the ME that you'll be fighting for the next ? decades??? Go ahead and see what happens to the world's oil markets.
But what we can say is this.....because of obama care, more people are insured. Not a bad thing in and of itself, BUT it becomes a bad thing when others have to pay for it.....and because people who could not afford insurance are now insured, it only makes sense that rates must be higher than they would be if those people were not insured. Bottom line is this....those of us that could afford insurance before are now paying for those who could not afford it then to have it now.
Also saw where China has a $14B investment project going on in Afghanistan right now
Confucius say more carrot and less stick si the way of the patient communist
http://www.afghanistan-culture.com/natural-resources.html
I think I answered my hypothetical question about "Why were there'
I find it more telling that you never question anything Obama and the left ever did. Your Hypocrisy knows no limits.I find it telling that you never address the question being asked. Of course the reason is because it exposes how gullible you and your ilk happen to be.
I'm not so sure that making a product that is closely tied to the housing market, an essential for most people more expensive is good for anyone.
I thought all conservatives bowed to Reagan? Reagan would be turning over in his grave hearing Republicans promoting trade tariffs.
Fuzz is a clown pure and simple. He is the stereotypical liberal, lie, cheat, or steal to get what they want.Thinking fuzz needs banned until he pays up to Brady
points for the pic of Tesla
a man otherwise SHOCKINGLY neglected by media and history
((did you see what I did there?))
or maybe it's Edgar Allen Poe.......is that Aunt Bea bringing up the rear or Madam Curie?
It's so hard to tell these days
Don't forget about taxes! Very exciting stuff to see suitcases of cash and coin head to DC where it will surely be used wisely. I felt like Obama sending that C-130 laden with skids of money to bribe Iran except Obama did it willingly.Realize small business owners across this country are struggling because they have been regulated and red taped out of business. And let's not even get started on what Obamacare has done to small business.
That's the point I'm making. Cut spending. Tons of wasted in fed spending starting with entitlements.So how does lowering revenue help lower spending? Spending has been an issue for 40 years. Taxes have been cut over and over since 1981 and all it has done is increase the debt. How about doing something that doesn't increase the debt?
I understand middle America is fed up with the lack of low skill jobs, but fvck....get off your asses and do something with yourselves. Trump isn't your savior.
Those super blue areas were all in on the socialist guy promising free handouts to all. Took a corrupt underhand screwjob to hand the nomination to Clinton.
But yeah, those red areas wanting handouts from their savior Trump.
I'm in a blue county. I pay more in taxes than a lot of people in those red counties make. Don't lump us all in with the socialists.
Are you joking or really that damn dense?
Maybe a little of both? Someone said all the people in those blue counties were on the Bernie train looking for free handouts. That doesn't describe me at all.
This will only last until October. Even though it should automatically be assumed that states must abide by federal law, the judge ruled that since these states have already been approved to receive the money that Trump can't retroactively add the stipulation to abide by federal law. Anyways, in October the new fiscal year kicks in, and Trump can add the stipulation to abide by federal law in order to receive federal money.
heard that too. Just have to wait for new calendar year in October. Feel better about itThis will only last until October. Even though it should automatically be assumed that states must abide by federal law, the judge ruled that since these states have already been approved to receive the money that Trump can't retroactively add the stipulation to abide by federal law. Anyways, in October the new fiscal year kicks in, and Trump can add the stipulation to abide by federal law in order to receive federal money.
Raise your hand if you are tired of the BS and are ready to dissolve the Union. It's time for a divorce .
Odd that he's encouraging Trump to be bold and go big because if Trump rolls out the big, bold plan he mentioned on the campaign trail it will certainly add to the debt now with the health care failure. The Freedom Caucus has already made it very clear that any tax plan that adds to the debt will not get their support and they'll vote no. So, coming from a Freedom Caucus member, this is confusing.http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/04/25/exclusive-rand-paul-real-men-cut-taxes/
Nice little piece from Rand Paul. I agree with everything he says, other than poking the bear saying "real men cut taxes". Unless maybe he just poked the bear to try and get some MSM attention.