ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%
  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
So accurate.

I ran into a woman like that a couple years ago. She was eating her lunch at a state park on sheltered picnic tables and I was about 75 ft away with two dogs. I was about 10 ft from being in the woods. She started yelling at the top of her lungs that my dogs were too close to her while she was eating. I said something that rhymed with Buck you witch and kept going by. She started calling 911 or some stupid stuff and then went to take pictures of my license plates. Where do these psychos come from?

Was she wearing a Hogwarts t-shirt by any chance?

They're cloning these people daily. Have to be. Not bothering to let their brains develop
 


tumblr_m7yrloJq2j1r7ryk6.gif
 
So accurate.

I ran into a woman like that a couple years ago. She was eating her lunch at a state park on sheltered picnic tables and I was about 75 ft away with two dogs. I was about 10 ft from being in the woods. She started yelling at the top of her lungs that my dogs were too close to her while she was eating. I said something that rhymed with Buck you witch and kept going by. She started calling 911 or some stupid stuff and then went to take pictures of my license plates. Where do these psychos come from?
sam's classroom.
 
See? Nobody cares. In fact, y'all're actively hostile. So quit being butthurt snowflakes when you see Satan. It's childish.

God loves you. Satan not so much. Satan knows where it's going along with it's angel's and will deceive, kill, and destroy. I'd rather inundate you with what you do not like if it is Godly versus give you any chance of indulging Satan in any way. Take it as an act of friendship/ kindness versus and act of hate.

At this point, me just doing nothing would have been horrible since I KNOW what is good and right versus just calling you a name or something.... (I do not mind rubbing and teasing you with God.) (He will never hurt you but it is up to you to accept or reject him.)

I'd have never sent you a Satan emblem as that would be active hostility as Satan is evil (I rarely use that word.). If I did anything, it was not to disturb but hopefully get your thinking changed. I won't apologize for bringing a nicety to you even though you stated you disliked it. I KNOW it wouldn't hurt you in any event BUT may in some way change your thinking to good things... Take care...
 
Well, Reagan Republicans are dead as well.

Not all of them. (I sure wish we had millions more though.) While I served under President Reagan, I am more conservative than President Reagan ever was though President Reagan realized his short-comings as I try to do. He was very articulate and that was such a blessing during that time.
 
Last edited:

That depiction of some sort of survey is the definition of fake news. Serving as the Commander-in-Chief???? Really... (They prefer Laughmala???) Not hardly...

THEN, whoever voted for her are people like this... (NO ONE wants this leading their country, NO ONE...)

James-Van-Der-Beek-Meme-Cry-01-112322-3728d1bf3c9341eb8bb7a89ded6582b1.jpg


Laughmala was doing that the entire debate. If you want that for President as a whiny leader you are a liar... OR, you want America to fail.
 
Not all of them. (I sure wish we had millions more though.) While I served under President Reagan, I am more conservative than President Reagan ever was though President Reagan realized his short-comings as I try to do. he was very articulate and that was such a blessing during that time.

I have no idea what that means -- to be more conservative than Reagan. Nothing in the Project 2025 policy proposals sounds conservative in any way. Reagan was popular -- far more popular than Trump -- but there wasn't quite as much cult of personality thing. In fact, when Reagan went on a Payoff Tour of Japan after his time in office, his popularity tumbled. Little did he know that all he had to do was lie about it and all would be forgiven.
 
I have no idea what that means -- to be more conservative than Reagan. Nothing in the Project 2025 policy proposals sounds conservative in any way. Reagan was popular -- far more popular than Trump -- but there wasn't quite as much cult of personality thing. In fact, when Reagan went on a Payoff Tour of Japan after his time in office, his popularity tumbled. Little did he know that all he had to do was lie about it and all would be forgiven.

Not sure what project 2025 is? I did hear it mentioned a time or two but that is the extent of my knowledge of it.)

President Reagan was a democrat. He was not a conservative but saw his error(s)... He came back to conservatism strongly but articulated popular and acceptable sentiments. President Reagan could articulate better than any President I have ever witnessed. All his beliefs were not conservative.

BUT, you NEVER see any media trash President Reagan. They don't DARE...
 
That depiction of some sort of survey is the definition of fake news. Serving as the Commander-in-Chief???? Really... (They prefer Laughmala???) Not hardly...

THEN, whoever voted for her are people like this... (NO ONE wants this leading their country, NO ONE...)

Laughmala was doing that the entire debate. If you want that for President as a whiny leader you are a liar... OR, you want America to fail.

If you support the Stolen Election lie, you don't know or care about this country.
 
i forgot this guy’s still the president. obviously so did he




My God. And they still can't figure out why we question this guy getting the most votes in Presidential history.
We are living in the Twighlight Zone.
This Is Fine GIF
 
If you support the Stolen Election lie, you don't know or care about this country.


Are you talking about 2020? Now you are only trying to equate...

Yes, the electronic process was manipulated. (I KNOW that.) It was even reported. Yeah now go ahead and tell me all court cases were dismissed... (Oh, a little secret, all court cases were dismissed due to technicalities of not having standing or something like that. They NEVER were dismissed or allowed to present evidence as there is plenty.)

You pulled that one out of somewhere but I understand where you are coming from better now....
 
Not sure what project 2025 is? I did hear it mentioned a time or two but that is the extent of my knowledge of it.)

President Reagan was a democrat. He was not a conservative but saw his error(s)... He came back to conservatism strongly but articulated popular and acceptable sentiments. President Reagan could articulate better than any President I have ever witnessed. All his beliefs were not conservative.

BUT, you NEVER see any media trash President Reagan. They don't DARE...
The vapors around Project 2025 sure are believable.

Well, none of Trump's "beliefs" are conservative. He's bizarre. He's the son of an immigrant.
 
I have no idea what that means -- to be more conservative than Reagan. Nothing in the Project 2025 policy proposals sounds conservative in any way. Reagan was popular -- far more popular than Trump -- but there wasn't quite as much cult of personality thing. In fact, when Reagan went on a Payoff Tour of Japan after his time in office, his popularity tumbled. Little did he know that all he had to do was lie about it and all would be forgiven.

Translation: I hated Reagan too but I'm going to pretend I had respect for him to show you that I'm reasonable and my hatred of every single Republican today is because they're all worse than Hitler even though most of their positions are further left than Reagan was.
 
Last edited:
Just got my informational ballot from Florida. On the ballot is an amendment to the state constitution that prohibits the state from making any law that prohibits abortions after viability except for the usual exceptions. Does NOT define when viability occurs. I'm sure I'll be labeled a RINO but I'm voting for it. 6 weeks is way too stringent, imo. From both a personal and political side, I'm in favor of some reasonable restrictions but not an all-out ban. I get the moral choice but you could also ban alcohol and cigarettes on moral grounds, too. Or porn and gentlemen's clubs. Not the same thing, I know, but less state control, in general, is preferable to more state control. Common sense says the time restrictions on abortion should be exactly the same as when the state can prosecute a murderer for 2 offenses in the case of the victim being pregnant and I'm positive not a single state defines that as 6 weeks.

Having just moved to the state, I did not know this was on the ballot.

Deciding when someone should be able to kill a human defines the era in which we live.

BTW, who suggested a baby is viable outside the womb at 6 weeks?
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT