No, gender is an emergent social construct, not a philosophical/economic/political theory. You can create those things that involve gender, but then you're talking about those theories, not gender itself. What you actually mean is biological sex, right? Which is determined by various physical biological indicators, some of which are malleable while others aren't. If an adult male undergoes surgeries to physically resemble a female in every way, most people would say that's a man that became a woman. They're still male with XY chromosomes biologically, but they're a woman in every functional, societal, practical way that matters to broader society, so they're a woman as that's societal defined. Notice how none of this is applicable to the previous topic? Your ham-fisted attempt at analogy is just deflection.
