Fine with me. Like I've always said, long as it's free.
Why? What would I have against fair elections? I'm the one always advocating for fairer elections where someone in Wyoming's vote doesn't count more than 4 times what someone in California's does. Or RCV, where you can vote for who you actually want instead of always having to hold your nose.
There is no logical argument you can make, if the law says that one must provide proof of ID and citizenship, in order for their vote to be valid (which is implicit, when requiring only US Citizens to vote in Federal Elections) that, in the absence of that proof, for whatever reason, their ballot is cast and counted, that it doesn't invalidate that vote. That vote is spurious, and by law, shall not be counted.
Where we really part ways is that you believe that a person should have an unlimited supply of those documents, at the ready, no matter how many copies that may be. Those documents should NEVER incur a charge because they are required for voting (and make no mistake; to actually follow the law, those documents ARE required (it's just not enforced).
I, however, say that an initial copy IS provided for free, and that if you need to prove your citizenship, but the initial documents have been lost, that it is incumbent upon YOU, to facilitate their replacement. Requiring something that you were given for free, CANNOT, by definition, be described as a poll tax.
With respect to photo Federal Voting ID's, I agree that they should be provided for free, to anyone that can prove they are a US Citizen. I'm all for it. But until DC makes that a priority, we have to follow the law, which is plain: Only US Citizens should be voting for Federal Officials. And, even though you believe, as it stands now, that that is tantamount to a poll tax (photo ID's not always being free), until the courts actually rule on what is a narrow issue, we are duty bound to follow the law as it currently stands, and it is NOT ambiguous. (even though you would like to make it so)