You are simply being willfully dishonest. Your own link supporting the crux of your argument, that the rare condition of female with a Y getting pregnant, had you actually take time to read it yourself refutes your own argument. Imbedded in the link is the source of your claim.
A woman treated in Meirut, India was found to have XY gonadal dysgenesis, meaning she looked female but has 95 per cent male DNA. Doctors have said it is akin to a man giving birth.
www.dailymail.co.uk
Your rare (LOL Only ONE ACTUALLY) in India had to go though months of hormone therapy to develop her uterus as well as have a donated egg because of having no ovaries.... does not support but actually refutes your argument. Having extreme medical intervention to allow her to carry a child to birth does not support your assertion.
We all, every single one of us know, that eventually if not already, medical scientific intervention could eventually provide for a male or a machine to carry a fetus to birth. All it takes is a willing host and medical crew to make it happen.