Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Strange, I thought I already had...
"I have the internet."
I need to walk back my previous comment some. I glanced at the topic while at work and thought the game was in CBS. It's actually on CBS sports so my statements were invalid as it relates to the game. However my point is still the same. The remaining flaw in the streaming media outlets is that most of the time local broadcast networks are not included in the package. I can get just about everything for $20 a month that I used to get for $120 a month. Local stations is the exception. There are free options for ABC, NBC and CBS of course but you can't control the market. My free option for those networks runs out of Pittsburgh. That fine for nation events like the Super Bowl but it's going to suck for SEC football games on CBS. I still need to work that out.Only channel I can't get anymore that I actually want is TLC.
You really haven't.
Other people are explaining that they pay for services available online.
So, please tell how you get to watch everything and not pay anything for it.
It will clearly help some people out.
I need to walk back my previous comment some. I glanced at the topic while at work and thought the game was in CBS. It's actually on CBS sports so my statements were invalid as it relates to the game. However my point is still the same. The remaining flaw in the streaming media outlets is that most of the time local broadcast networks are not included in the package. I can get just about everything for $20 a month that I used to get for $120 a month. Local stations is the exception. There are free options for ABC, NBC and CBS of course but you can't control the market. My free option for those networks runs out of Pittsburgh. That fine for nation events like the Super Bowl but it's going to suck for SEC football games on CBS. I still need to work that out.
When does the narwhal bacon?
I think that's my point.
People are still "forking over money" for (an)other services to watch games.
In 1980, we had a small cable bill, a phone bill, and paid for long-distance calls.
Combine the amount spent then on those services, to what people pay today for cell/data, internet, and whatever programming packages they are paying for, whether over the Internet, or through cable/satellite.
Yes, it's better. But, nothing's really free.
You are paying for it, unless you are stealing it. (And that's been going on for a long time, too).
I've tried all the providers except Hulu and YouTube. How is YouTube compared to the others? So far from what I have seen Sling is the best.Even YouTube is on on streaming these days for oldheads. You don't have to know some dark web corner to look in to find your programming.
It's not even in the same ball park. Even with the frustrations that sometimes spring up I am literally saving $100 a month. That's no small matter. I wouldn't have moved to streaming if I were save $20 a month or something but $100, hell yes. I just upped my package to $55 a month and that includes HBO. I was paying $120 a month with no HBO.
My internet bills are the same either way and don't affect this at all. I am required to be available at home for work so I need good internet either way. Cell phone my work pays for.
I'm no fan of millennials but you have to give credit where credit is due. They were right on streaming TV. Cable bills have gotten to the point were they should be criminal. Streaming TV is blowing that out of the water. It's funny that Directv now is less than half the cost of Directv and you get the same stuff. And you don't have to pay the monthly equipment fees. Talk about out outrageous charges. After being a customer for 10 years I think I've paid off my equipment by now. Why the $10 a month charges? And why charge for HD content? They don't with their online package. Cable fees were in bad need of a market correction and it looks like that is going to take root.
I've tried all the providers except Hulu and YouTube. How is YouTube compared to the others? So far from what I have seen Sling is the best.
Yep, we're on the same page. Am I saving money? Yes. But if you broke down the cable costs if I used Spectrum, Im probably paying the exact same as if I were paying them only for the specific servicew I use through Sling.I think that's the point. The costs, when broken down, are the same.
And they are actually higher than they used to be.
Most recognize that cable, in its current form, is a dying animal.
The point is that the media conglomerates are going to get theirs. It's just a matter of when the last few decide to pull the cable plug.
The media companies know it is happening, and have already created the new (and higher) revenue streams to keep them going.
People who keep cable (for now), keep it largely because they want better access to local channels, and want DVR capabilities.
Within a few years, that goes away.
Throw in the fact, that the same companies (Verizon, ATT), are also pulling in large cell/data bills each month, they still have a huge share of your wallet, even as you let the cable go.
Someone can call a data plan "a different service", and that's fine. It is a different service. It is still a service that almost everyone pays for and it's something they used to not pay for 20 years ago.
And the revenue is going to same people that provide cable service, the service that people are so proud to cut.
Again, it's about counting up the total media dollar spent, and being honest about whether we are really saving money, or if we are just shifting our expenditures around.
And we still haven't talked about what people pay for Netflix, Amazon (prime), Hulu, etc.
Yep, we're on the same page. Am I saving money? Yes. But if you broke down the cable costs if I used Spectrum, Im probably paying the exact same as if I were paying them only for the specific servicew I use through Sling.
If ESPN and Fox and a handful of these other one off networks would just get together and allow a legitimate sports streaming service they could do just fine. I'm not sure how much the streaming business has yet to impact the TV rights for college sports.....there are a lot of cable subscribers who are subsidizing these huge TV payouts we get and given the option will eventually quit subsidizing by not paying for those sports channels. As it stands with Sling you get either the ESPN/Disney or FOX family in its two base packages so they havent begun to impact the sports marketplace quite yet.
Myself given the option would pay only for the aforementioned sports service and probably Netflix and be done. 99.9% of live TV programming is pure garbage IMO.
I am trying to plan ahead for the game next weekend and unfortunately Sling TV doesn't have that station (at least not in my package). I was going to try and watch it using the CBS Sports Network app and using my mom's cable login, but Spectrum/Time Warner wasn't listed for use with it.
I did see HULU listed as an option. Can anyone confirm that they carry that station on their streaming tv service? I might do their 7 day free trial for their service if so. I don't know of any other option besides someone streaming it on here.
And it will still be better. Plus all the savings until then.Pretty soon, the cord cutters will be back to paying what they used to pay for cable/satellite. They just won't be calling is cable/satellite.
They will, however, be calling it "expensive."
Why? Facebook doesn't think it is worth posting.Look up remo william
Ah I'm still good withCBS sports app realtime!...I also like seeing My Pats beating everyone in the AFC north....go RAVENS!....Love me some Art Modell...Bookmark this. Someone posted it a long time ago and think it's still being run.
And it will still be better. Plus all the savings until then.
It gets better all the time. That's never been in question.
But, the over-all share of wallet has increased.
It's a pretty simple point that a lot of people seem to miss: Many people pay a lot of money for high-speed Internet. Paying for this Internet allows them to not pay for expensive cable/equipment packages.
I get that.
But, without the Internet, you're "free" cable options go away.
When everyone gets "free" high-speed Internet, then that's really the coup.
Cord cutters are saving money on cable, but they still have to pay their car insurance!!1!1!!!11
You should try it. Get rid of the Internet and see how much you enjoy watching your free streams.
I really don't understand the point of this question. I have to have internet anyway so how does having internet count as a negative to online streaming. This pretty much like saying cut off your electricity and see how good your traditional cable provider is. I am going to pay for internet regardless. That bill is locked in. From there it's a choice of paying $20 a month or $120 a month.
Dude stop arguing about it. Everyone pretty much has internet regardless of their tv choice. So stop using that as an excuse to have cable or satellite. Even without tv options I have internet for gaming, social media, shopping, news, kid's schooling, etc. My kids both have Chromebooks from their schools to do school work on. So I'd have internet regardless of my tv watching option. I'm sure others would as well.
Now using that internet that we all already pay for to find a cheaper tv watching experience is what this is about. I pay $55 for internet, $25 for Sling TV, and about $10 for Netflix. If I tried to just add cable to my internet they would charge me something like $140 and make me get a home phone. So I'm saving at least $50 a month. That may not sound like much to you, but $600 more money a year comes in pretty handy.
Now back to the original topic.
I really don't understand the point of this question. I have to have internet anyway so how does having internet count as a negative to online streaming. This pretty much like saying cut off your electricity and see how good your traditional cable provider is. I am going to pay for internet regardless. That bill is locked in. From there it's a choice of paying $20 a month or $120 a month.
Dude stop arguing about it. Everyone pretty much has internet regardless of their tv choice. So stop using that as an excuse to have cable or satellite. Even without tv options I have internet for gaming, social media, shopping, news, kid's schooling, etc. My kids both have Chromebooks from their schools to do school work on. So I'd have internet regardless of my tv watching option. I'm sure others would as well.
Now using that internet that we all already pay for to find a cheaper tv watching experience is what this is about. I pay $55 for internet, $25 for Sling TV, and about $10 for Netflix. If I tried to just add cable to my internet they would charge me something like $140 and make me get a home phone. So I'm saving at least $50 a month. That may not sound like much to you, but $600 more money a year comes in pretty handy.
Now back to the original topic.
<UKUGAVoice>
Hoooo boy...
Alright, fancy smart guy cord cutter, but have you ever thought about this: you saved by getting rid of archaic cable/satellite setup, but you STILL pay for groceries!
Let me know how much you love your precious internet streaming once you stop eating food and die of starvation!
</UKUGAVoice>