If that's true, he and that info are all about to disappear. Unfortunately for him this ain't the USA of old. Half the people in that building were probably on the take or report to someone on the take.
Good try though Mr good Samaritan
POLITICAL THREAD
- Thread starter kybobcat
- Start date
If that's true, he and that info are all about to disappear. Unfortunately for him this ain't the USA of old. Half the people in that building were probably on the take or report to someone on the take.
Good try though Mr good Samaritan
Nothing illustrates Democrats like this mixed up POS. People who think like this he/she are running this country. Right into the sewer
So the democrats are now officially positioned as enemies of the bible ?
IRS Denies Religious Group Tax Exempt Status; States “Bible teachings” are “affiliated with the Republican party”
First Liberty Institute represents Christians Engaged, Texas nonprofit in appeal...www.globenewswire.com
Just because a person believes there may be instances of systemic racism, does not make that person lazy and it doesn't mean they can't or aren't successful in life. They could have persevered. I personally believe in some parts of the country, systemic racism certainly still exists. Whether it be in some local police departments, prosecutors offices, and even at the judge level. There are thousands, perhaps even millions of municipalities in the whole country. It's highly likely, that there are segments still operating in a way that is significantly disadvantageous to certain groups who don't hold positions of power in those communities.
Last edited:
TRUTH. We are living in an upside world.
I wouldn't want to insure him.
I agree. We have an open Senate seat, hope he runs for that.
Even if he did refuse to bake the gay couple a cake, so what? Libs are perfectly fine with FB, Twitter, CNN, et al censoring or suppressing news stories they don't agree with because they're 'a privately owned company - they can do what they want' but this individual who happens to own a bakery can't? I'm guessing there are other bakeries who would've been glad to provide a cake but we have to have the government MAKE a private citizen do something in the course of his business that he doesn't want to do? Does the business owner not have the right to refuse service to anyone? Will it eventually hurt his business if he continues to refuse business from potential customers who don't agree with him politically? Most likely. But, it's his business and his prerogative to be as narrow-minded as he chooses to be. Certainly the media companies are not shy about promoting one viewpoint to the exclusion of all others and no one on the Left seems too worked up about that.
As soon as people realize that liberalism is a disease the faster we can get rid of it. Under our current status of everything is racist, we have umpteen genders, anything said could be offensive, socialism is a Utopian style government followed by communism being the way to go, violent destruction of our cities is really peaceful protesting, and many more outlandish claims, we can't move forward. There are just too many red flags to navigate through the BS that are the Social Justice rules.
Not what I am saying. Believing there is systemic racism means you really have not thought this through or get out much or you are easily duped. There is enough proof out there if you look for it instead of listening to the race baiters and agenda pushers to see the truth. There are enough lazy people out there who will side with the afore mentioned race pushers so they will be a large enough group to make enough noise to make it look legit. The entitlement mindset (The Lazy) has grown and it is not a race issue, nothing really is anymore although some would have you believe it is.
Last edited:
Yes but, even small levels of liberalism is. Once you go down that road it is hard to turn around or just stop and settle.
Liberalism is not just any disease, it is a cancer.
No, I'm not clear on what you are saying. Are you saying that systemic racism doesn't exist anywhere in the country? And those who claim to have experienced it in their community or even if there was some type of review of specific entities within that community that revealed troublesome patterns and practices, that it is all because folks were duped or listened to an agenda?
You would have to explain to me what liberalism is then because I don't follow you. There are plenty of productive and highly functional members of society who may be described as liberal.
Yes. Racism exist but, only in some areas but, it is not systemic and it is not limited to one race. Racism exist mainly in individuals and not so much as groups although there are some. blm, antifa, kkk, and a few others are racist groups. That is not systemic, that is individuals joining by choice.
He didn’t refuse the couple. He refused the message on the cake. Plain and simple.
After all, “We’ll own nothing and like it” as the edict from the great reset goes.
If a whole town or municipalities' law enforcement/court SYSTEM has been found to disproportionately target a specific race of people, then that is systemic racism. The very system with the power to investigate, detain, arrest, put on trial, convict and incarcerate. There are official government reports (not newspaper articles) with numbers and data and interview and other legitimate sources that reveal this. Now, I can post those here, but if you're simply going to tell me that such reviews and data are agenda driven only and not born out of any facts, then is there really any point in me doing so?
Todays liberal is much different than liberals of the past and basically put it is the anything goes mentality. The Sodom and Gomorrah mindset. A more chaotic way of life which if left in their own home or circle would be ok for them but, liberals have taken it to a level of social control as to push their agenda on to those who do not agree with that way of living nor want to live that way.
It’s always bastardized statistics, that’s why there is no sense sense in you posting your agenda driven ”data.”
Anyone genuinely educated, or at least competent in mathematics, can see right through your lies.
There is no such thing as systemic racism in modern America. Your claims are no better than extremist idiocy.
You will have to define disproportionally. Disproportionate to what? If you are suggesting that individuals should be "targeted" based on the make-up each race is to the population as a whole, that is a ridiculous concept in law enforcement.
It’s no different than claiming police are systemically against men, sinc e that’s what they “data” clearly show.
Men are disproportionately incarcerated because police hate men, they have an intrinsic bias against hem and the system is keeping men Down
Men are disproportionately incarcerated because police hate men, they have an intrinsic bias against hem and the system is keeping men Down
I just think it's dangerous to practice generalizations and group think like this. What past are we talking about? Clinton years? Well, that wasn't long ago. That was from 1993-2001. When you say "even a little bit of it is." That's dangerous and counterproductive. It's no better than folks who round all Trump voters into one group of "deplorables." It's lazy and counterproductive and the cycle will never break if we don't acknowledge that there are variations in both conservatism and liberalism and on occasion, depending on who you are talking to, those lines can become blurry.
No it's not the same. If you conduct numerous interviews and learn of numerous comments toward men by the folks being investigated then you may be onto something. If you have a small town somewhere that data shows targets blacks and then when you conduct interviews and learn that leadership in that department openly says things like "blacks are like terrorist etc." That might be a red flag.
Okay, well there it is. Nothing to see here. There are no problems with any towns and or small municipalities in the whole country. Got it. Thank you.
Fair points. I’m still registered as one. And back a decade ago I did vote for some local democrats and if a moderate democrat existed I would consider voting for them... but a moderate democrat is a unicorn with dragon wings these days.
But I suppose you’re right. That entire party went so far left it’s almost impossible to be a true independent anymore... which sucks because the GOP is awful too.
I’m all for eliminating parties and making candidates run on their ideas forcing people to listen to what they actually stand for and not what the letter is next to their name.
Edit: and just to amplify how far left democrats have gone, in 1992 my entire family were registered democrats. By 2009 not a single person was.
Per usual, wrong because as always you're leaving a large portion of the story out, and of course we know why...an entirety is never needed, just a narrative and something to rage about. And that's the problem, ppl can't separate feeling and emotion. So, it needs to be repeated that Phillips never turned a gay couple away from his shop. He never “refused” to sell a gay couple his products. Mullins and Craig were free to buy anything they desired from Masterpiece Cakeshop. They weren’t free, however, to force Philips to create something that conflicted with his long-held religious beliefs. One of the most basic ideals of liberty is that we don’t coerce individuals to say things, or refrain from saying things, in ways that violate their conscience.
So your entire narrative is again make believe. They tried to force him into labor of a product he doesn't make, didn't have, and never has produced. Nuanced thought is difficult. It would be like if I cut lumber and make wood furniture and you said build me a house. I don't build houses you can buy the lumber or any of the furniture tho. So, it's wood...houses are made of wood, build the house bigot.
But, to play this simpleton game...you know, if the cake owner was Muslim and denied to create something ....you would say nothing, or at the very least you would have the respect to not demand a service from a practicing Muslim who's beliefs this contradicted
Last edited:
Most of these reports are agenda driven these days and that is the problem. Objectivity is non existent. There will be other "reports and facts" that will refute it but, they are just ignored as well. Such as the shooting and killing of unarmed black men by police. It has been proven that it is not the genocide many proclaim it to be and in fact it is much lower than the so called "facts" say it is. The problem today is that there have been so many false reports and investigations from the lowest to the highest levels that we are subjected to just using our own anecdotal evidence and what we chose to read and believe as our "Facts". And yes, there is really no point of you posting them here because you believe many of the things the mainstream media spouts that I don't believe for a moment. Until the media and the government starts reporting the news and not agendas this will continue to be an issue for those who don't trust them. By the way, there are also official government reports that said Trump colluded with Russia and he committed Quid Pro Quo with Ukraine and other things that were found to be false and drummed up by government agencies. Imagine that, and you trust the government? Hell, even Biden and his son have been proven to be racist too. Are they also part of the systemic racism you talk about or does that just fit Trump and the GOP.
Not counter productive when you take into account todays social driven mob mentality which by the way is a liberal generated mob bent on the destruction of the constitution and the principles that made this country great. Good luck trying to talk people into civil discourse by listening to lunatics trying to separate a country based on race using a false narrative of genocide and hate based rhetoric.
I'm not sure if you're saying this but I want to be clear just in case. The United States as a whole is NOT systemically racist. There was a time when it clearly was, as recently as the 60s? We agree?
If so, then I think you must admit that it is HIGHLY unlikely that EVERY independent municipality in the nation has grown and advanced at the same rate. To me, it is far more likely, when taking into account the nation's history, a history in which many of you were alive, that there are still some issues in some specific places.
When I see the following behavior by a police CHIEF as just one example, then is it really hard to fathom that my take on this is at least reasonable?
The former New Jersey police chief, who was convicted of lying to the FBI and is accused of a racially motivated attack against a Black teenager, was sentenced Wednesday to 28 months in federal prison.
Frank Nucera Jr, the former top cop in Bordentown, was handed the sentence by U.S. District Judge Robert Kugler after Nucera was convicted in 2019 for lying to FBI agents who were interviewing him in regards to a report that he assaulted and violated the civil rights of an 18-year-old handcuffed suspect at a hotel a few years prior.
However, Nucera will remain free on bail as the most serious charges against the longtime cop remain unresolved. A mistrial was declared on two of the counts after the jury remained deadlocked on if the assault was a hate crime and violated the victim’s civil rights.
A spokesman for U.S. Attorney’s office said it intends to retry the case against Nucera on the two charges, but it is unclear when a second trial may begin. Kugler ordered Wednesday that Nucera would not begin to serve his sentence until a re-trial occurs.
Nucera’s attorney did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the sentencing.
The sentencing is the first bit of closure in the prolonged criminal case that centered around an incident at the Bordentown Ramada Inn in September 2016, where the victim and a 16-year-old girl failed to pay for their room after swimming in the pool, prompting hotel staff to call police.
A struggle ensued and police called for backup, which included Nucera.
As they led the 18-year-old man out in handcuffs, authorities said Nucera grabbed the man’s head and slammed it into the right side of a metal doorjamb separating the hallway from the stairwell.
In a later interview with FBI agents at a diner, Nucera denied every touching the suspect, though a witness said Nucera grabbed the teenager’s head “like a basketball” and slammed it into the doorframe.
Nucera was convicted of lying to federal investigators after the jury deliberated for more than 30 hours over six days before reaching the verdict, though the jury was deadlocked on the two most serious charges: hate crime assault and deprivation of civil rights under the color of law.
Prosecutors argued during the trial that assault on the Black suspect at the hotel was motivated by “deep racial animus,” and had the tapes to prove it.
An officer, who was with Nucera that night, recorded his comments after the incident at the hotel.
In the recording, Nucera was caught making racist comments about those involved, including using the N-word.
It wasn’t the first time Nucera had been recorded making racist comments and using slurs.
Authorities had access to 81 recordings made by Nathan Roohr, a K-9 sergeant who secretly recorded Nucera making racist remarks on the job.
“I wish that (N-word) would come back from Trenton and give me a reason to put my hands on him, I’m tired of ‘em. These (N-word) are like ISIS, they have no value,” he said in one recording about a suspect accused of slashing police vehicle tires. “They should line them all up and mow ‘em down. I’d like to be on the firing squad, I could do it.”
He also said former President Donald Trump was the “last hope for white people,” and used the N-word to describe a former NFL player who was building a fitness complex in Bordentown.
But a jury could not come to a unanimous decision on if the assault was racially motivated. Prosecutors have made it clear they intend to retry the case, though they have been unable to due to the coronavirus pandemic.
Nucera was initially scheduled to be sentenced in February 2020, but the sentencing had been continually pushed back.
Nucera filed a motion to have the conviction dismissed, though Kugler denied it.
The longtime cop left the police force in 2017 after a 34-year career upon learning he was under federal investigation.
“The general public has suffered,” the judge said before sentencing Nucera, according to the Philadelphia Inquirer. “His words and his deeds caused great harm to the public perception of the criminal justice system.”
