ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%
  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
Most of these reports are agenda driven these days and that is the problem. Objectivity is non existent. There will be other "reports and facts" that will refute it but, they are just ignored as well. Such as the shooting and killing of unarmed black men by police. It has been proven that it is not the genocide many proclaim it to be and in fact it is much lower than the so called "facts" say it is. The problem today is that there have been so many false reports and investigations from the lowest to the highest levels that we are subjected to just using our own anecdotal evidence and what we chose to read and believe as our "Facts". And yes, there is really no point of you posting them here because you believe many of the things the mainstream media spouts that I don't believe for a moment. Until the media and the government starts reporting the news and not agendas this will continue to be an issue for those who don't trust them. By the way, there are also official government reports that said Trump colluded with Russia and he committed Quid Pro Quo with Ukraine and other things that were found to be false and drummed up by government agencies. Imagine that, and you trust the government? Hell, even Biden and his son have been proven to be racist too. Are they also part of the systemic racism you talk about or does that just fit Trump and the GOP.

I'm not sure if you're saying this but I want to be clear just in case. The United States as a whole is NOT systemically racist. There was a time when it clearly was, as recently as the 60s? We agree?

If so, then I think you must admit that it is HIGHLY unlikely that EVERY independent municipality in the nation has grown and advanced at the same rate. To me, it is far more likely, when taking into account the nation's history, a history in which many of you were alive, that there are still some issues in some specific places.

When I see the following behavior by a police CHIEF as just one example, then is it really hard to fathom that my take on this is at least reasonable?

The former New Jersey police chief, who was convicted of lying to the FBI and is accused of a racially motivated attack against a Black teenager, was sentenced Wednesday to 28 months in federal prison.

Frank Nucera Jr, the former top cop in Bordentown, was handed the sentence by U.S. District Judge Robert Kugler after Nucera was convicted in 2019 for lying to FBI agents who were interviewing him in regards to a report that he assaulted and violated the civil rights of an 18-year-old handcuffed suspect at a hotel a few years prior.

However, Nucera will remain free on bail as the most serious charges against the longtime cop remain unresolved. A mistrial was declared on two of the counts after the jury remained deadlocked on if the assault was a hate crime and violated the victim’s civil rights.


A spokesman for U.S. Attorney’s office said it intends to retry the case against Nucera on the two charges, but it is unclear when a second trial may begin. Kugler ordered Wednesday that Nucera would not begin to serve his sentence until a re-trial occurs.


Nucera’s attorney did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the sentencing.


The sentencing is the first bit of closure in the prolonged criminal case that centered around an incident at the Bordentown Ramada Inn in September 2016, where the victim and a 16-year-old girl failed to pay for their room after swimming in the pool, prompting hotel staff to call police.


A struggle ensued and police called for backup, which included Nucera.


As they led the 18-year-old man out in handcuffs, authorities said Nucera grabbed the man’s head and slammed it into the right side of a metal doorjamb separating the hallway from the stairwell.

In a later interview with FBI agents at a diner, Nucera denied every touching the suspect, though a witness said Nucera grabbed the teenager’s head “like a basketball” and slammed it into the doorframe.


Nucera was convicted of lying to federal investigators after the jury deliberated for more than 30 hours over six days before reaching the verdict, though the jury was deadlocked on the two most serious charges: hate crime assault and deprivation of civil rights under the color of law.


Prosecutors argued during the trial that assault on the Black suspect at the hotel was motivated by “deep racial animus,” and had the tapes to prove it.


An officer, who was with Nucera that night, recorded his comments after the incident at the hotel.


In the recording, Nucera was caught making racist comments about those involved, including using the N-word.


It wasn’t the first time Nucera had been recorded making racist comments and using slurs.

Authorities had access to 81 recordings made by Nathan Roohr, a K-9 sergeant who secretly recorded Nucera making racist remarks on the job.


“I wish that (N-word) would come back from Trenton and give me a reason to put my hands on him, I’m tired of ‘em. These (N-word) are like ISIS, they have no value,” he said in one recording about a suspect accused of slashing police vehicle tires. “They should line them all up and mow ‘em down. I’d like to be on the firing squad, I could do it.”

He also said former President Donald Trump was the “last hope for white people,” and used the N-word to describe a former NFL player who was building a fitness complex in Bordentown.


But a jury could not come to a unanimous decision on if the assault was racially motivated. Prosecutors have made it clear they intend to retry the case, though they have been unable to due to the coronavirus pandemic.


Nucera was initially scheduled to be sentenced in February 2020, but the sentencing had been continually pushed back.


Nucera filed a motion to have the conviction dismissed, though Kugler denied it.


The longtime cop left the police force in 2017 after a 34-year career upon learning he was under federal investigation.


“The general public has suffered,” the judge said before sentencing Nucera, according to the Philadelphia Inquirer. “His words and his deeds caused great harm to the public perception of the criminal justice system.”
 
No it's not the same. If you conduct numerous interviews and learn of numerous comments toward men by the folks being investigated then you may be onto something. If you have a small town somewhere that data shows targets blacks and then when you conduct interviews and learn that leadership in that department openly says things like "blacks are like terrorist etc." That might be a red flag.
Name 5 such places. Thanks.
 
Even if he did refuse to bake the gay couple a cake, so what? Libs are perfectly fine with FB, Twitter, CNN, et al censoring or suppressing news stories they don't agree with because they're 'a privately owned company - they can do what they want' but this individual who happens to own a bakery can't? I'm guessing there are other bakeries who would've been glad to provide a cake but we have to have the government MAKE a private citizen do something in the course of his business that he doesn't want to do? Does the business owner not have the right to refuse service to anyone? Will it eventually hurt his business if he continues to refuse business from potential customers who don't agree with him politically? Most likely. But, it's his business and his prerogative to be as narrow-minded as he chooses to be. Certainly the media companies are not shy about promoting one viewpoint to the exclusion of all others and no one on the Left seems too worked up about that.
We went over all this yesterday. It's illegal to refuse service to someone on the basis of race, religion, sex, national origin; age or disability(added later). Sexual orientation and gender identity fall under sex since Bostock v. Clayton County.
 
I'm not sure if you're saying this but I want to be clear just in case. The United States as a whole is NOT systemically racist. There was a time when it clearly was, as recently as the 60s? We agree?

If so, then I think you must admit that it is HIGHLY unlikely that EVERY independent municipality in the nation has grown and advanced at the same rate. To me, it is far more likely, when taking into account the nation's history, a history in which many of you were alive, that there are still some issues in some specific places.

When I see the following behavior by a police CHIEF as just one example, then is it really hard to fathom that my take on this is at least reasonable?

The former New Jersey police chief, who was convicted of lying to the FBI and is accused of a racially motivated attack against a Black teenager, was sentenced Wednesday to 28 months in federal prison.

Frank Nucera Jr, the former top cop in Bordentown, was handed the sentence by U.S. District Judge Robert Kugler after Nucera was convicted in 2019 for lying to FBI agents who were interviewing him in regards to a report that he assaulted and violated the civil rights of an 18-year-old handcuffed suspect at a hotel a few years prior.

However, Nucera will remain free on bail as the most serious charges against the longtime cop remain unresolved. A mistrial was declared on two of the counts after the jury remained deadlocked on if the assault was a hate crime and violated the victim’s civil rights.


A spokesman for U.S. Attorney’s office said it intends to retry the case against Nucera on the two charges, but it is unclear when a second trial may begin. Kugler ordered Wednesday that Nucera would not begin to serve his sentence until a re-trial occurs.


Nucera’s attorney did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the sentencing.


The sentencing is the first bit of closure in the prolonged criminal case that centered around an incident at the Bordentown Ramada Inn in September 2016, where the victim and a 16-year-old girl failed to pay for their room after swimming in the pool, prompting hotel staff to call police.


A struggle ensued and police called for backup, which included Nucera.


As they led the 18-year-old man out in handcuffs, authorities said Nucera grabbed the man’s head and slammed it into the right side of a metal doorjamb separating the hallway from the stairwell.

In a later interview with FBI agents at a diner, Nucera denied every touching the suspect, though a witness said Nucera grabbed the teenager’s head “like a basketball” and slammed it into the doorframe.


Nucera was convicted of lying to federal investigators after the jury deliberated for more than 30 hours over six days before reaching the verdict, though the jury was deadlocked on the two most serious charges: hate crime assault and deprivation of civil rights under the color of law.


Prosecutors argued during the trial that assault on the Black suspect at the hotel was motivated by “deep racial animus,” and had the tapes to prove it.


An officer, who was with Nucera that night, recorded his comments after the incident at the hotel.


In the recording, Nucera was caught making racist comments about those involved, including using the N-word.


It wasn’t the first time Nucera had been recorded making racist comments and using slurs.

Authorities had access to 81 recordings made by Nathan Roohr, a K-9 sergeant who secretly recorded Nucera making racist remarks on the job.


“I wish that (N-word) would come back from Trenton and give me a reason to put my hands on him, I’m tired of ‘em. These (N-word) are like ISIS, they have no value,” he said in one recording about a suspect accused of slashing police vehicle tires. “They should line them all up and mow ‘em down. I’d like to be on the firing squad, I could do it.”

He also said former President Donald Trump was the “last hope for white people,” and used the N-word to describe a former NFL player who was building a fitness complex in Bordentown.


But a jury could not come to a unanimous decision on if the assault was racially motivated. Prosecutors have made it clear they intend to retry the case, though they have been unable to due to the coronavirus pandemic.


Nucera was initially scheduled to be sentenced in February 2020, but the sentencing had been continually pushed back.


Nucera filed a motion to have the conviction dismissed, though Kugler denied it.


The longtime cop left the police force in 2017 after a 34-year career upon learning he was under federal investigation.


“The general public has suffered,” the judge said before sentencing Nucera, according to the Philadelphia Inquirer. “His words and his deeds caused great harm to the public perception of the criminal justice system.”
Still say that the country is not systemically racist. There are racist people and yes the 60's were much worse. As I said though, we had come a long way until recently when the race baiters ramped up their rhetoric. Each situation should be dealt with individually and not linked in with the whole which is happening through the news media and social media.

So, since you linked one saying Trump is the last hope for white people do you equate that to Trump being a racist? Forget that he can be an egotistical loud mouth for a moment and just use common reasoning.
 
They never even got to talking about decorations, he said he doesn't make cakes for gay weddings. We went over all this yesterday.

You were wrong yesterday too. They refused the job, not the person. That's well within their rights which will again be decided by scotus.

I don't do bankruptcy. So even if a gay person wants me to file bankruptcy for them, I won't. That's within my rights. Had a straight person ordered the gay wedding cake, they can deny it based on their choice of which jobs to accept.

They already prevailed once. It's ridiculous they have to do it again. More ridiculous the lower courts won't follow binding case law.

What needs to happen is judges should be reviewed by their state bar and/or the appropriate review board every single time they just blatantly ignore clear binding law. Of course practically that's a bad idea because extremists will just pervert that too.
 
So your entire narrative is again make believe. They tried to force him into labor of a product he doesn't make, didn't have, and never has produced. Nuanced thought is difficult. It would be like if I cut lumber and make wood furniture and you said build me a house. I don't build houses you can buy the lumber or any of the furniture tho. So, it's wood...houses are made of wood, build the house bigot.

But, to play this simpleton game...you know, if the cake owner was Muslim and denied to create something ....you would say nothing, or at the very least you would have the respect to not demand a service from a practicing Muslim who's beliefs this contradicted
He makes wedding cakes. You're trying to draw a distinction between a wedding cake for a heterosexual wedding and a homosexual wedding. There isn't one. Unless you're classifying based on sexuality. Sex discrimination.

I had the same position on a Muslim woman who refused a waxing service. Posts are in this very thread from several years ago. Look it up.
 
We went over all this yesterday. It's illegal to refuse service to someone on the basis of race, religion, sex, national origin; age or disability(added later). Sexual orientation and gender identity fall under sex since Bostock v. Clayton County.
We went over this yesterday, they cannot make him make a cake that goes against his rights of religious beliefs. Their "right" to have him make a cake depicting something that is against his religious morals and principles do not supersede his. They could have bought any other cake there or went elsewhere. You are dead wrong about this.


By the way, have you been paying attention to what Biden is doing since you voted for him.

Border security is the worst it has been in over 20 or so years. Influx of illegals worst it has been in many many years. Inflation is through the roof and rising. National debt rising at unprecedented speed. EO's being used as dictatorial governance instead of using congress (for the most part). Putin praising Biden for how sharp he is (LOL!). Gas prices going higher as our dependence on foreign oil widens.

The list continues and you are worried about a gay couple that did not get the cake they wanted? Liberal agendas. Country last, meaningless problems front and center.
 
Last edited:
Still say that the country is not systemically racist. There are racist people and yes the 60's were much worse. As I said though, we had come a long way until recently when the race baiters ramped up their rhetoric. Each situation should be dealt with individually and not linked in with the whole which is happening through the news media and social media.

So, since you linked one saying Trump is the last hope for white people do you equate that to Trump being a racist? Forget that he can be an egotistical loud mouth for a moment and just use common reasoning.

Hell no, I don't attribute this article to Trump being racist. To be honest, that part of the article was the least egregious. When you compare a whole race of people to ISIS and you are the CHIEF, then THAT is something that should give EVERYONE pause. It's why, if I hear black folks in Ferguson say there are issues in that police department, then HOW can ANYONE simply dismiss it? Michael Brown has NOTHING to do with it either. Anyway, I digress. Back to your question.

I don't know if Trump is racist. There are some things in his past that make me question it unfortunately, but nothing that tells me for certain.
 
Hell no, I don't attribute this article to Trump being racist. To be honest, that part of the article was the least egregious. When you compare a whole race of people to ISIS and you are the CHIEF, then THAT is something that should give EVERYONE pause. It's why, if I hear black folks in Ferguson say there are issues in that police department, then HOW can ANYONE simply dismiss it? Michael Brown has NOTHING to do with it either. Anyway, I digress. Back to your question.

I don't know if Trump is racist. There are some things in his past that make me question it unfortunately, but nothing that tells me for certain.

A racist man in the system does not make the system racist.
 
Does anyone see anything wrong with this email from another NJ Police CHIEF

I think that most police officers are finding the national rhetoric about police abuse and racial
profiling quite upsetting. Profiling, racial or otherwise, has it's place in law enforcement when
used correctly and applied fairly. Unfortunately we have never heard that from our President,
top political leaders or our US Attorney General. Don't ask the police to ignore what we know.
Black gang members from Teaneck commit burglaries in Wyckoff. That's why we check out
suspicious black people in white neighborhoods. White kids buy heroin in black NYC
neighborhoods. That's why the NYPD stops those white kids. The police know tl1ey are there
to buy drugs. It's insane to think that the police should just "dumb down" just to be politically
correct. The public wants us to keep them safe and I'm confident that they want us to use our
skills and knowledge to attain that goal.
My major concern is that all of this misguided complaining about police officers will cause an
officer to react slower to something you might perceive as a threat. That delay could be
deadly.
Continue to do your job relying on your training, instincts and knowledge:
A common thread in the recent national incidents are persons who resist the police. That
resistance then creates your counter reaction. We don't run from fights.
This department has a history of being respected by the public. Each of you contribute to that
daily. Continue to be fair with people and treat them with respect. If someone resists your
authorized demands, use your counter reaction as the law allows and you have my 100%
support should others complain. If you have done your job correctly, they don't want to get me
on the other end of the phone.
Above all, do what you have to do and that which the law allows you to do to remain safe.
 
He makes wedding cakes. You're trying to draw a distinction between a wedding cake for a heterosexual wedding and a homosexual wedding. There isn't one. Unless you're classifying based on sexuality. Sex discrimination.

I had the same position on a Muslim woman who refused a waxing service. Posts are in this very thread from several years ago. Look it up.
False.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SDC8888
199287398_330735605315176_292337911264556778_n.jpg
 
Hell no, I don't attribute this article to Trump being racist. To be honest, that part of the article was the least egregious. When you compare a whole race of people to ISIS and you are the CHIEF, then THAT is something that should give EVERYONE pause. It's why, if I hear black folks in Ferguson say there are issues in that police department, then HOW can ANYONE simply dismiss it? Michael Brown has NOTHING to do with it either. Anyway, I digress. Back to your question.

I don't know if Trump is racist. There are some things in his past that make me question it unfortunately, but nothing that tells me for certain.
But, there are proven things in Biden's and his sons past and recent times that prove he/they were/are.
 
A racist man in the system does not make the system racist.

That's debatable. I think it depends on who or what position that person holds. I mean that's the whole point. Some people wield the POWER to completely change the lives of a great many of people if left unchecked.

Does a racist judge (man or woman) who is the only judge in that town make the system racist?

I mean if one group of people are fare more likely to face different consequences for coming into contact with a system than another group, and when the reasons are similar in nature, then you have to at least examine it. It could be false but it may not be. What I'm saying is that when you take into account the history, I don't see how you can act like it's some sort of mythical thing with no reasonableness to it.
 
But, there are proven things in Biden's and his sons past and recent times that prove he/they were/are.

I would classify the things "I was aware of" as questionable. Not proven. The stuff I just posted about the police Chief, that to me is proof.
 
That's debatable. I think it depends on who or what position that person holds. I mean that's the whole point. Some people wield the POWER to completely change the lives of a great many of people if left unchecked.

Does a racist judge (man or woman) who is the only judge in that town make the system racist?

I mean if one group of people are fare more likely to face different consequences for coming into contact with a system than another group, and when the reasons are similar in nature, then you have to at least examine it. It could be false but it may not be. What I'm saying is that when you take into account the history, I don't see how you can act like it's some sort of mythical thing with no reasonableness to it.

It's not debatable. Society nor the system wants that person in power, making those decisions. Those people are removed from their positions when/if the rare occasion occurs.

If they weren't, then that would be supporting evidence for systemic racism because the system would tacitly support it by turning a blind eye. That is not what happens.

There is no evidence to support the leftist lie of systemic racism; it's entirely a divisive and hateful expedient lie to advance their agenda, nothing more.
 
It's not debatable. Society nor the system wants that person in power, making those decisions. Those people are removed from their positions when/if the rare occasion occurs.

If they weren't, then that would be supporting evidence for systemic racism because the system would tacitly support it by turning a blind eye. That is not what happens.

There is no evidence to support the leftist lie of systemic racism; it's entirely a divisive and hateful expedient lie to advance their agenda, nothing more.

No! If and when that person is removed then HOPEFULLY that system in which they led ceases being an oppressive system. But however long that person was in power and if it resulted in disproportionate punishment or God forbid INNOCENT people from one specific group being punished then that system was what it was during that time. These things have consequences, it's why they can't be ignored.
 
Does anyone see anything wrong with this email from another NJ Police CHIEF

I think that most police officers are finding the national rhetoric about police abuse and racial
profiling quite upsetting. Profiling, racial or otherwise, has it's place in law enforcement when
used correctly and applied fairly. Unfortunately we have never heard that from our President,
top political leaders or our US Attorney General. Don't ask the police to ignore what we know.
Black gang members from Teaneck commit burglaries in Wyckoff. That's why we check out
suspicious black people in white neighborhoods. White kids buy heroin in black NYC
neighborhoods. That's why the NYPD stops those white kids. The police know tl1ey are there
to buy drugs. It's insane to think that the police should just "dumb down" just to be politically
correct. The public wants us to keep them safe and I'm confident that they want us to use our
skills and knowledge to attain that goal.
My major concern is that all of this misguided complaining about police officers will cause an
officer to react slower to something you might perceive as a threat. That delay could be
deadly.
Continue to do your job relying on your training, instincts and knowledge:
A common thread in the recent national incidents are persons who resist the police. That
resistance then creates your counter reaction. We don't run from fights.
This department has a history of being respected by the public. Each of you contribute to that
daily. Continue to be fair with people and treat them with respect. If someone resists your
authorized demands, use your counter reaction as the law allows and you have my 100%
support should others complain. If you have done your job correctly, they don't want to get me
on the other end of the phone.
Above all, do what you have to do and that which the law allows you to do to remain safe.
In part but not all of it. The profiling part is against the law I believe so... but there is something to be said about something being out of place. Israelis profile potential threats and have had only one highjacked plane in their whole history that was quickly taken care of. Police officers are trained to look for the unusual and act upon it. Perhaps they are going overboard with their actions sometimes and could use better training and suggestions on how to proceed. But I think he could be referencing situations based on the levels or crimes committed by certain individuals of age and race. Now you could say that some of a different race is overlooked and therefore the numbers are skewed. But, when you factor in the racial percentages of the police force with it, you must assume that the numbers might be correct.

"Of the entire 35,783-member police force in 2020: 47% are white and 53% are members of minority groups. Of 23,464 officers on patrol: 43% (10,162) are non-Hispanic white. 57% (13,302) are Black, Latino (of any race), or Asian or Asian-American."

Police officers have it really hard now because the numbers of actual shootings have been largely misrepresented and reported.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Duke Blu
No! If and when that person is removed then HOPEFULLY that system in which they led ceases being an oppressive system. But however long that person was in power and if it resulted in disproportionate punishment or God forbid INNOCENT people from one specific group being punished then that system was what it was during that time. These things have consequences, it's why they can't be ignored.
No, that person is what he/she were at that time. Not the system. The system would mean that the next person in line would adopt the same "system" because that was the system and it was legal.
 
They have proof of Biden and his son and that has been posted here before.
I am aware of Biden saying if you don't vote for me then you ain't black. That is ignorant and insulting but I don't think that is proof, I saw Hunter talk like a rapper using the N word, again, the context was as if he was using it as a term of endearment, which again, I don't like, it's insulting and ignorant. But surely, you can differentiate between THAT and Frank Nucera wishing to do harm to black people, express a hate for black people etc...I can get past the ignorance and somebody being "too comfortable." I can't get past somebody who wants to slam my kids head into a car, put him before the firing squad and wipe me and my family off the planet. Because if I am being too honest, at least in my everyday experience, MOST OF US get a little comfortable sometimes. Then again i'm not your typical lib. I don't do the political correctness thing all the time. I can take off color comments and jokes.
 
No, that person is what he/she were at that time. Not the system. The system would mean that the next person in line would adopt the same "system" because that was the system and it was legal.

Okay, fair point, but i do feel like that is splitting hairs. It's like the gun thing. The gun itself isn't deadly, it's the person with it. Okay fair point but that doesn't matter to the people who are more consistently being affected.
 
Yes. Racism exist but, only in some areas but, it is not systemic and it is not limited to one race. Racism exist mainly in individuals and not so much as groups although there are some. blm, antifa, kkk, and a few others are racist groups. That is not systemic, that is individuals joining by choice.
For something to be “systemic”!there needs to be codified laws on the books, or policies specifically designed to exclude certain people or races. Do people do racist things? Yes. Are they by and large isolated incidents? Yes. But unless you can point me to these places that have laws or policies in place to specifically exclude blacks, please enlighten us. We would all be in agreement that would be wrong.
 
In part but not all of it. The profiling part is against the law I believe so... but there is something to be said about something being out of place. Israelis profile potential threats and have had only one highjacked plane in their whole history that was quickly taken care of. Police officers are trained to look for the unusual and act upon it. Perhaps they are going overboard with their actions sometimes and could use better training and suggestions on how to proceed. But I think he could be referencing situations based on the levels or crimes committed by certain individuals of age and race. Now you could say that some of a different race is overlooked and therefore the numbers are skewed. But, when you factor in the racial percentages of the police force with it, you must assume that the numbers might be correct.

"Of the entire 35,783-member police force in 2020: 47% are white and 53% are members of minority groups. Of 23,464 officers on patrol: 43% (10,162) are non-Hispanic white. 57% (13,302) are Black, Latino (of any race), or Asian or Asian-American."

Police officers have it really hard now because the numbers of actual shootings have been largely misrepresented and reported.
Agreed. Again, not very egregious in my opinion but that small thing can be a big thing. If the numbers show that blacks are stopped far more than whites in Wykoff when the majority of people in Wykoff are white and coupled with what this Chief sent out, that may be an issue?
 
  • Like
Reactions: warrior-cat
For something to be “systemic”!there needs to be codified laws on the books, or policies specifically designed to exclude certain people or races. Do people do racist things? Yes. Are they by and large isolated incidents? Yes. But unless you can point me to these places that have laws or policies in place to specifically exclude blacks, please enlighten us. We would all be in agreement that would be wrong.

No, i'm not aware of any such places that OPENLY have policies or laws that specifically exclude blacks, if that is what you need then you got me there.
 
I am aware of Biden saying if you don't vote for me then you ain't black. That is ignorant and insulting but I don't think that is proof, I saw Hunter talk like a rapper using the N word, again, the context was as if he was using it as a term of endearment, which again, I don't like, it's insulting and ignorant. But surely, you can differentiate between THAT and Frank Nucera wishing to do harm to black people, express a hate for black people etc...I can get past the ignorance and somebody being "too comfortable." I can't get past somebody who wants to slam my kids head into a car, put him before the firing squad and wipe me and my family off the planet. Because if I am being too honest, at least in my everyday experience, MOST OF US get a little comfortable sometimes. Then again i'm not your typical lib. I don't do the political correctness thing all the time. I can take off color comments and jokes.
201631318_126367682910255_4563568569953225593_n.jpg
 
Does anyone see anything wrong with this email from another NJ Police CHIEF

I think that most police officers are finding the national rhetoric about police abuse and racial
profiling quite upsetting. Profiling, racial or otherwise, has it's place in law enforcement when
used correctly and applied fairly. Unfortunately we have never heard that from our President,
top political leaders or our US Attorney General. Don't ask the police to ignore what we know.
Black gang members from Teaneck commit burglaries in Wyckoff. That's why we check out
suspicious black people in white neighborhoods. White kids buy heroin in black NYC
neighborhoods. That's why the NYPD stops those white kids. The police know tl1ey are there
to buy drugs. It's insane to think that the police should just "dumb down" just to be politically
correct. The public wants us to keep them safe and I'm confident that they want us to use our
skills and knowledge to attain that goal.
My major concern is that all of this misguided complaining about police officers will cause an
officer to react slower to something you might perceive as a threat. That delay could be
deadly.
Continue to do your job relying on your training, instincts and knowledge:
A common thread in the recent national incidents are persons who resist the police. That
resistance then creates your counter reaction. We don't run from fights.
This department has a history of being respected by the public. Each of you contribute to that
daily. Continue to be fair with people and treat them with respect. If someone resists your
authorized demands, use your counter reaction as the law allows and you have my 100%
support should others complain. If you have done your job correctly, they don't want to get me
on the other end of the phone.
Above all, do what you have to do and that which the law allows you to do to remain safe.
What do find wrong with it?
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT