MAKE CONGRESS WEAR CLOWN SUITS"
I think it's a fantastic idea. Anyone know if it's working out for the Brits?
![_87559825_standing-lords.jpg](/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Fichef-1.bbci.co.uk%2Fnews%2F624%2Fcpsprodpb%2FCE9F%2Fproduction%2F_87559825_standing-lords.jpg&hash=1212e841a66c6c69f9c10c95aec5d2bb)
MAKE CONGRESS WEAR CLOWN SUITS"
What happened to Moe? Went back to being Deeeee?
You mocked the idea of term limits actually being set. You didn't mock the idea of Trump picking up votes by campaigning on that issue. That was the original premise.Agreed. That's why I mocked the idea in the first place.
"MY CANDIDATE WILL WIN IF S/HE PROMISES TO MAKE CONGRESS WEAR CLOWN SUITS"
"As long as politics is the shadow cast on society by big business, the attenuation of the shadow will not change the substance."Most republicans that aren't voting for Trump is because he has scorned them from getting his support. He has absolutely supported the democrats more as a business man and for obvious reasons.
If your in business you need to have no borders and cheaper labor and places to hide money from American taxes.
The thing is and no one, and I mean not one single person, is bringing to the attention of the masses is that there is two classes but it isn't rich/poor or white/minority it is political/common folk. Politics is now the biggest business and we are now being bought out by countries that hate what we are but want to capatilize.
It's like having employee's bitch everyday about working for you, showing your customers negative attitudes, bad mouthing the business, calling in sick(fake) with no regard but showing up on pay day an hour before checks get there just to bitch about getting paid late.
That business won't last and neither will America.
I think he's saying you can slow it down, but you can't stop it.Come on dude, you know damn well I have no clue what your saying nor can I respond to that.
Latest reuters poll( ya knoe the one who yall libs cheered last week when it showed a 12 point lead, and also the one who doesnt count undecideds) had it within the margin of error if all 4 candidates are counted.
If thats a 4 touchdown lead, then hillary must be our last years football team at halftime.
Yeah, I thought about Blah, Blah, Blah, for a response but then decided it was redundant.Come on dude, you know damn well I have no clue what your saying nor can I respond to that.
Please answer the following questions
1) Why isn't Jeb Bush taking on Hillary Clinton if money is the end-all be-all?
2) Hillary Clinton is beholden to people who contribute to an entity entirely outside of her election campaign. The idea that elections are the main conduit for bribery is ridiculous and always has been
3) Wouldn't term limits be a much simpler way to avoid legislators focusing so much on campaigns?
4) "Freedom of speech does not mean that if you have more money then you should be able to speak louder." I don't even know what that means. Someone who owns a radio station can speak louder than me. The New York Times (a corporation who endorses candidates, something that would seemingly be illegal under your interpretation of the Constitution) can speak louder than me. That has no affect whatsoever on my freedom of speech. Again, please clarify what you mean by this?
Bonus question: Do you agree with the FEC and Hillary Clinton that CU notwithstanding the government has the right to ban books if it contains even one statement about whether or not the reader should vote for or against a candidate?
Thanks for your time; I look forward to the non-answers and weaseling to come
Trump to make an appearance before a largely black audience in detroit over labor day weekend.
Ooooo this'll be interesting. Usually a high-ranking Dem goes there on LD weekend. With POTUS and Biden doing it in recent years, one would've thought Hillary would be the speaker this year. Not sure she does that if Trump is in town.Trump to make an appearance before a largely black audience in detroit over labor day weekend.
Are we going to ignore the attempts of the GOP to do the very same thing simply because they weren't successful?Usually these little Facebook posts are total BS, but...I'm trying to figure out why this one isn't perfectly accurate.
![]()
And I can guarantee protesters will make it in, like it or not. BLM for sure.
What difference does the motive make if it's true? Are you justifying bad behavior?Are we going to ignore the attempts of the GOP to do the very same thing simply because they weren't successful?
Where are WikiLeaks hacked GOP emails?
Whenever some 3rd party only attacks one side it makes me very suspicious of motive.
How do we know that the "whistleblower" wasn't murdered by Assange or one of his agents so they could try and pin it on HRC? I mean if we're throwing out conspiracies here I'm sure we can come up with a few more.
Are we going to ignore the attempts of the GOP to do the very same thing simply because they weren't successful?
Where are WikiLeaks hacked GOP emails?
Whenever some 3rd party only attacks one side it makes me very suspicious of motive.
How do we know that the "whistleblower" wasn't murdered by Assange or one of his agents so they could try and pin it on HRC? I mean if we're throwing out conspiracies here I'm sure we can come up with a few more.
So what difference does "liberal bias" make with the MSM as long as the reporting is true?What difference does the motive make if it's true? Are you justifying bad behavior?
Ones a f@@king crime and one isn't. Obviously, you don't understand the difference.So what difference does "liberal bias" make with the MSM as long as the reporting is true?
I know the answer but curious if you do?
First, a "majority of Republicans" didn't vote for Trump. You can also bet your sweet bippie that had the GOP known that Trump would actually win the nomination that they most certainly would have done the same."Are we going to ignore"....The Republican attempts to waylay Trump were not premeditated months in advance by placing key operatives in positions of authority to systematically and strategically promote a single candidate. And, the subsequent attempts to attack Trump once he became a threat weren't successful because the majority of Republicans aren't blind F'in sheep.
"Where" "When" "How"---nice deflection. Why don't you just address Hillary and the Democratic Party's co-ordinated efforts to steal the election? Or is the old deflect, deceive or blame it on someone else strategy still in place?
I'm not so sure that anything the DNC did rigging their own party's primary election was a crime. Unethical, yes. Crime?Ones a f@@king crime and one isn't. Obviously, you don't understand the difference.
It gets even better. Emerson's poll today has it tied in Ohio, Hillary +3 in Pennsylvania, and +5 Michigan. Considering that most undecided and independent voters usually swing towards the challenger, and considering that the polls generally assume a 2012 turnout in terms of demographics, it basically means that Ohio is leaning towards Trump, but is in play, that Michigan is the opposite, and that Pennsylvania is a dead toss up.Latest reuters poll( ya knoe the one who yall libs cheered last week when it showed a 12 point lead, and also the one who doesnt count undecideds) had it within the margin of error if all 4 candidates are counted.
If thats a 4 touchdown lead, then hillary must be our last years football team at halftime.
Liberal bias normally exagerrates the news so much that it hardly resembles the truth. Moreover, it morphs into a lie. You can't spell liberal without lie.So what diit hardlyference does "liberal bias" make with the MSM as long as the reporting is true?
I know the answer but curious if you do?
No lover for HRC here...I just believe that Trump is every bit as morally, ethically and criminally corrupt as HRC and add emotionally unstable. Add that I don't really think that he wants the job else he wouldn't continue to forcibly cram his foot into his own mouth.I didn't say the majority of Republicans voted for Trump, I just said the majority of Republicans aren't blind sheep. And, don't project what the Republicans would or would not have done--bottom line, they didn't systematically rig the election..otherwise Trump would not have been sitting where he is today.
I have never owned a bippie.
I agree, what the DNC did was stupid. But probably not illegal because if it was there would be lawsuits. Well---probably no lawsuits with this DOJ. We don't yet know if all the voting machines were actually legit or not--and doubt we'll ever know.
And, yes---I still don't care for Trump and have always wondered if he wasn't a plant. But at least I'm bluntly critical of the carnival barker who currently is the Republican's candidate. Unlike most Democrats who blindly follow the morally, ethically and criminallt corrupt Hillary Clinton and her ilk.
Just a sneak peek of what's headed your way: Pennsylvania is probably going into the Red column in this weeks USA Wide poll that will be released this week.It gets even better. Emerson's poll today has it tied in Ohio, Hillary +3 in Pennsylvania, and +5 Michigan. Considering that most undecided and independent voters usually swing towards the challenger, and considering that the polls generally assume a 2012 turnout in terms of demographics, it basically means that Ohio is leaning towards Trump, but is in play, that Michigan is the opposite, and that Pennsylvania is a dead toss up.
If this was a football game, she's up by a field goal, and it's halftime; and her team is noticeably showing some fatigue.
I'm pretty sure most on the GOP side would enjoy seeing them...that's the difference...if there's corruption their voters would like to know about and see it...not just ignore it. Dems just want the government doing their thinking for them, love career politicians, and accept the establishment. The GOP more than likely did the same thing to Ron Paul in 2012. The difference is, unlike Bernie, Paul didn't sell out to the establishment and endorse the party.Are we going to ignore the attempts of the GOP to do the very same thing simply because they weren't successful?
Where are WikiLeaks hacked GOP emails?
Whenever some 3rd party only attacks one side it makes me very suspicious of motive.
How do we know that the "whistleblower" wasn't murdered by Assange or one of his agents so they could try and pin it on HRC? I mean if we're throwing out conspiracies here I'm sure we can come up with a few more.
I've not seen anyone celebrating what the DNC did and would gather that most viewed it as wrong.Very few approved of the GOP attempt to submarine trump. It actually helped get him voted because voters rebelled. So I'm not sure the point you're trying to make.
The msm argument is ridiculous. Report the facts. All of them. Regardless of the party. And leave opinion out of it. Should be relatively simple. But rarely happens.
By the way, anytime your first line in defending hillary is "but Trump/republicans" - you've already lost. You should be able to defend your candidate without invoking the other. "They do it too!" Isn't a valid defense.
I've not seen anyone celebrating what the DNC did and would gather that most viewed it as wrong.
Ok, WikiLeaks...report all of your facts, not just those that serve a purpose. Especially when being orchestrated by someone who isn't even a US citizen. So you think it is ok for foreigners to try and influence US elections?
As I've said on here many times...you've not seen me telling anyone how great HRC is. I think we have two terrible choices. When 8 out of 10 posters on this board are all telling us how awful one candidate is, they need reminding that their candidate is far, far, far from perfect. So far from perfect that he is most likely to lose an election to someone that this time last year I thought was unelectable. I've not lost anything because I've got no bigger stake in the outcome than anyone else. Sadly we may all lose regardless of the outcome.
If the media actually did their job then neither one of these shit stains would be on the cusp of leading this country. How the eff did we go from George Washington to this?If the media actually did their jobs HRC would NOT be leading Trump at this point. As shitty of a campaign that Trump has won, he is still in striking distance which is remarkable alone.