Unbelievable.
![]()
Keep the people in the dark! The ultimate liberal idea.
There's no chance you're banging an 80 yr old... and if you are, please dont tell us.Being in this field. There are some 80 yr olds that definitely defy the perception. Although the other day I shook the hands of a 70 something woman. Literally felt the bones in her hands crumbling as soon as I applied a grip. That Hanoi Jane sure couldn't give a hand job.
Austin- Plenty places to live there. If you're over 50 I could retire there. Get a golf cart and maintain my current drinking problem and I am mf'ing set.
Interesting piece here from 538 on what happens to the Republican Party now. Yes, some of it is written from a liberal POV, and if you look closely enough you might see some barely contained glee. Still, pretty interesting article. http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-end-of-a-republican-party/
Including this part, about how (if Trump loses) differing groups of "NeverTrumpers" will blame each other for his nomination, leading to a stalemate going forward....
“On the one hand, you have the autopsy folks, right?” she said, referring to those who concur with the findings of a 2012 report that said, among other things, that the GOP should reach out to minority voters. “You have the people that look at Donald Trump and they go, ‘He’s alienating Latino voters, he’s doing damage to the brand, he’s looking backwards, not forwards, he’s the opposite of what we needed.’”
The other Never Trump faction — “the Ted Cruz folks, the conservative purists,” as Soltis Anderson put it — would disagree with the diagnosis of why Trump was bad for the party. “Their main argument with Trump is not that he’s mean to Latinos; their main argument with Trump is that he’s not really a conservative, he’s not really one of us,” she said. “When all is said and done, those two Never Trump forces are going to blame each other for his existence.”
The prospect that the GOP leaders wouldn’t even be able to agree on why Trump — arguably the worst crisis the modern party has experienced — was even a crisis to begin with, seemed to say it all.
“There is no happy ending to this story,” she said.
Looking for Hillary to pull a Coach K during the debate and have a heart attack the moment things look bleak. Then they will say Trump was so mean to a defenseless woman that he almost killed her.
Portman (+7.5), Rubio (+5.7), Ayotte (-1.0), and Toomey (-1.2) are all out-performing Trump ( -3.8, -2.7, -9.3, and -8.0, respectively) in their respective states; the WI senate race is really the only one that makes Trump look like a net-even addition to the ticket. While we can certainly hand-wave things like media coverage, etc., the fact remains that there's no data to support the argument that Trump is doing as well as Generic Republican X in the states that will determine the election.what really takes the cake are their disingenuous arguments that they present regarding Trump's lack of ability to win the election. The general quote is "Thanks a lot, Trumpkins, you have nominated the one candidate, the ONLY candidate, who would NOT beat Hillary Clinton". It's disingenuous for two reasons. First, these people want Clinton to win over Trump in the first place. Second, IF they're correct, it's only because they themselves are the cause of it. Trump is dominating with independents. He's polling much better than the media expected with minorities. He's siphoning enough Dem voters to the point that this election would be an absolute landslide if he could get 95% of the GOP voters, and he still wins comfortably with 85%. As it is, he's around 75% and he's in real jeopardy of losing.
.
Bill Clinton wants to help rebuild Detroit with.....you guessed it. Syrian refugees.
http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presi...nton-calls-for-rebuilding-detroit-with-syrian
There's no chance you're banging an 80 yr old... and if you are, please dont tell us.
*RINO cuck, thank you very muchI should know, presumably - but what is a cuck?
Actually, while these candidates are outperforming Trump, it's not to the extent that you claim. You are again cherry picking polls, while ignoring polls that don't support your theory. The most recent polls have Trump tied in Ohio (Emerson), down by 3 in Penn. (Emerson), and ranging from up by 3 to down by 2 in Florida (all RCP polls that are within the last week). Also, each candidate in these states have their own strengths and weaknesses, as do their opponents. For example, you cite Rubio as an example Rubio is a popular incumbent who strong ties to the Cuban community in South Florida. It's not surprising that he's up in his race. It's kind of odd that you would list him, though; considering that Trump beat Rubio in Florida itself.Portman (+7.5), Rubio (+5.7), Ayotte (-1.0), and Toomey (-1.2) are all out-performing Trump ( -3.8, -2.7, -9.3, and -8.0, respectively) in their respective states; the WI senate race is really the only one that makes Trump look like a net-even addition to the ticket. While we can certainly hand-wave things like media coverage, etc., the fact remains that there's no data to support the argument that Trump is doing as well as Generic Republican X in the states that will determine the election.
also, I don't think many people are saying that he's "the only candidate who would NOT beat Hillary"; I think most are saying that he had the worst starting position (maybe Christie would've been worse due to his unfavorables, but Christie knows how to run general election campaigns)
I used the RCP average. I didn't cherry pick anything.Actually, while these candidates are outperforming Trump, it's not to the extent that you claim. You are again cherry picking polls, while ignoring polls that don't support your theory. The most recent polls have Trump tied in Ohio (Emerson), down by 3 in Penn. (Emerson), and ranging from up by 3 to down by 2 in Florida (all RCP polls that are within the last week). Also, each candidate in these states have their own strengths and weaknesses, as do their opponents. For example, you cite Rubio as an example Rubio is a popular incumbent who strong ties to the Cuban community in South Florida. It's not surprising that he's up in his race. It's kind of odd that you would list him, though; considering that Trump beat Rubio in Florida itself.
Fine, but if the average includes polls from several weeks ago, the average is meaningless. 3 weeks ago, Clinton was up nationally by anywhere from 5 to 10 points, depending on the poll. Any state poll from that time range is going to reflect that. The current national polls show a range of Trump +3 to Clinton +7. (by the way, Reuters has Clinton +1 today but it may not be on RCP yet). Accordingly, the only state polls of relevance are those released within the last week or so.I used the RCP average. I didn't cherry pick anything.
And you just cited the Emerson PA poll despite Monmouth coming out today with significantly different results. ZOMG YOURE CHERRY PICKINGFine, but if the average includes polls from several weeks ago, the average is meaningless. 3 weeks ago, Clinton was up nationally by anywhere from 5 to 10 points, depending on the poll. Any state poll from that time range is going to reflect that. The current national polls show a range of Trump +3 to Clinton +7. (by the way, Reuters has Clinton +1 today but it may not be on RCP yet). Accordingly, the only state polls of relevance are those released within the last week or so.
Agree in general, but there's difference between absence of evidence and evidence of absence.I'm not saying this to support one side or the other....but IMO, I don't think anyone or any poll has a clue as to who will actually show up and vote on election day. Very few are passionate about their candidate to absolutely guarantee they'll vote at all.
When all is said and done, there may be more votes cast this election to keep a candidate from winning than votes cast for a particular candidate. (If that makes sense.)
He looks like he found the holy grail but chose the wrong cup.![]()
Holy crap is he old, racist, and unhealthy. How in the world could liberals support this guy?
That's definitely from a disreputable source. A cuck is a term that alt right trolls invented (I think Vox Day gets the credit) to describe wishy-washy, pandering conservatives, not liberals. In fact, the term is short for "cuckservative".From a disreputable source:
"Cuck. It's become a slur that people trying to portray how alpha they are use against liberals who base their political opinions on estrogen fueled emotions (their words not mine lulz). I use it ironically."
What a strange and unimaginable place is the Internet. If someone had foreseen it in the 50s would they have ended the world to save us all?
That's exactly where it originated.Isn't a "cuck" a guy who likes to watch other men bang his wife while he stands by?
Seems like that term would apply to the people who want to flood the country with illegal aliens and refugees, expand the dependent class, etc.
Seems like the lefties to me.
I'd prefer I not do the work of the husband (pay taxes) while the Mexicans, Syrians, lazy assholes, etc. do the work of the BBC (enjoy all the benefits).
but the picture involved Jeb and McCain naked/tied to chairs while watching a sombrero-wearing Hasidic Jew porking a woman.
Earliest use of the "cuck" term (in the political world) that I can remember was from a year or two ago before Trump was even officially in the race. I forget exactly what the caption was, but the picture involved Jeb and McCain naked/tied to chairs while watching a sombrero-wearing Hasidic Jew porking a woman.
Of course Virginia will got hilary, one of her crooked minions has given voting rights to thousands of felons. Terry McCauliff
A less funny joke was that speech from Hillary Clinton denouncing the alt right. I wonder if she is getting worried- it smacked of desperation. The equivalent would be Trump giving a speech warning us about the Tumblr SJWs (who are basically the leftist version of the alt right).There is so much projection involved in the creation of that term. The alt-right is an unfunny joke
oh, im thoroughly expecting a leak of the NYT editorial board audio tape if this race is remotely in play in early octoberBoys, we ain't seen nothing yet from the media. If the race continues to tighten its gonna be Katy bar the door for them.