POLITICAL THREAD
- Thread starter kybobcat
- Start date
Unbelievable.
They already do this. MSM lies continually. Never will forget the black reporter on CNN claiming protest in St Louis was peaceful while a riot was going on.
Looking for Hillary to pull a Coach K during the debate and have a heart attack the moment things look bleak. Then they will say Trump was so mean to a defenseless woman that he almost killed her.
There's no chance you're banging an 80 yr old... and if you are, please dont tell us.
If he wins, THAT'S a happy ending, but for not for the cucks; they will be every bit as obnoxious in trying to undercut his Presidency as they are being obnoxious in undercutting his candidacy. Of all the things that both the GOPe/RINO cucks to Trump's left and the TruCons to Trump's right are doing to annoy, what really takes the cake are their disingenuous arguments that they present regarding Trump's lack of ability to win the election. The general quote is "Thanks a lot, Trumpkins, you have nominated the one candidate, the ONLY candidate, who would NOT beat Hillary Clinton". It's disingenuous for two reasons. First, these people want Clinton to win over Trump in the first place. Second, IF they're correct, it's only because they themselves are the cause of it. Trump is dominating with independents. He's polling much better than the media expected with minorities. He's siphoning enough Dem voters to the point that this election would be an absolute landslide if he could get 95% of the GOP voters, and he still wins comfortably with 85%. As it is, he's around 75% and he's in real jeopardy of losing. Thanks to the cucks, though it's not too late for them to change their minds.
If he loses, the #NeverTrump crowd, from Fox News, to the National Review (most of the writers, not all), to RedState to the Weekly Standard, and so on, gets to own it. They can own every consequence of it. The TruCons, neocons, and other assorted cucks can take credit for it, and all they'll do instead is blame the Trump primary voters (I disagree with the premise of the article; they will NOT blame each other, they'll keep blaming the GOP base, ie, Trump supporters), as they cynically then turn on a dime and moan and moan about the Clinton presidency that they will have created.
Still waiting on the "Trump raped __________ allegations". Ive said for months theyre coming. Itll happen when/if things get close.
Portman (+7.5), Rubio (+5.7), Ayotte (-1.0), and Toomey (-1.2) are all out-performing Trump ( -3.8, -2.7, -9.3, and -8.0, respectively) in their respective states; the WI senate race is really the only one that makes Trump look like a net-even addition to the ticket. While we can certainly hand-wave things like media coverage, etc., the fact remains that there's no data to support the argument that Trump is doing as well as Generic Republican X in the states that will determine the election.
also, I don't think many people are saying that he's "the only candidate who would NOT beat Hillary"; I think most are saying that he had the worst starting position (maybe Christie would've been worse due to his unfavorables, but Christie knows how to run general election campaigns)
Well yea. It makes sense. Inner city Detroit is like a third world country.
![[laughing]](http://l.yimg.com/j/assets/img/emoticons/classic/laugh.r191677.gif "Laughing [laughing]")
Actually, while these candidates are outperforming Trump, it's not to the extent that you claim. You are again cherry picking polls, while ignoring polls that don't support your theory. The most recent polls have Trump tied in Ohio (Emerson), down by 3 in Penn. (Emerson), and ranging from up by 3 to down by 2 in Florida (all RCP polls that are within the last week). Also, each candidate in these states have their own strengths and weaknesses, as do their opponents. For example, you cite Rubio as an example Rubio is a popular incumbent who strong ties to the Cuban community in South Florida. It's not surprising that he's up in his race. It's kind of odd that you would list him, though; considering that Trump beat Rubio in Florida itself.
Fine, but if the average includes polls from several weeks ago, the average is meaningless. 3 weeks ago, Clinton was up nationally by anywhere from 5 to 10 points, depending on the poll. Any state poll from that time range is going to reflect that. The current national polls show a range of Trump +3 to Clinton +7. (by the way, Reuters has Clinton +1 today but it may not be on RCP yet). Accordingly, the only state polls of relevance are those released within the last week or so.
And you just cited the Emerson PA poll despite Monmouth coming out today with significantly different results. ZOMG YOURE CHERRY PICKING
I'm not saying this to support one side or the other....but IMO, I don't think anyone or any poll has a clue as to who will actually show up and vote on election day. Very few are passionate about their candidate to absolutely guarantee they'll vote at all.
When all is said and done, there may be more votes cast this election to keep a candidate from winning than votes cast for a particular candidate. (If that makes sense.)
When all is said and done, there may be more votes cast this election to keep a candidate from winning than votes cast for a particular candidate. (If that makes sense.)
Agree in general, but there's difference between absence of evidence and evidence of absence.
Rubio or Kasich are the only two who had the potential to do better than Trump. Rubio short circuited. And Kasich just never caught on.
fuzz gonna defend the FEC in Citizens United or just ignore it until he breaks down and Googles "arguments against Citizens United"?
He looks like he found the holy grail but chose the wrong cup.
Holy crap is he old, racist, and unhealthy. How in the world could liberals support this guy?
From a disreputable source:
"Cuck. It's become a slur that people trying to portray how alpha they are use against liberals who base their political opinions on estrogen fueled emotions (their words not mine lulz). I use it ironically."
What a strange and unimaginable place is the Internet. If someone had foreseen it in the 50s would they have ended the world to save us all?
"Cuck. It's become a slur that people trying to portray how alpha they are use against liberals who base their political opinions on estrogen fueled emotions (their words not mine lulz). I use it ironically."
What a strange and unimaginable place is the Internet. If someone had foreseen it in the 50s would they have ended the world to save us all?
That's definitely from a disreputable source. A cuck is a term that alt right trolls invented (I think Vox Day gets the credit) to describe wishy-washy, pandering conservatives, not liberals. In fact, the term is short for "cuckservative".
Last poll I've seen had Hillary in the lead at 41%. Of course instead of talking how she's winning...it means 59% of people don't want her.
Isn't a "cuck" a guy who likes to watch other men bang his wife while he stands by?
Seems like that term would apply to the people who want to flood the country with illegal aliens and refugees, expand the dependent class, etc.
Seems like the lefties to me.
I'd prefer I not do the work of the husband (pay taxes) while the Mexicans, Syrians, lazy assholes, etc. do the work of the BBC (enjoy all the benefits).
Seems like that term would apply to the people who want to flood the country with illegal aliens and refugees, expand the dependent class, etc.
Seems like the lefties to me.
I'd prefer I not do the work of the husband (pay taxes) while the Mexicans, Syrians, lazy assholes, etc. do the work of the BBC (enjoy all the benefits).
The latest USA Wide poll show Trump gaining strength in Ohio/Pennsylvania - two states vital to his chances of winning in November. Dropping back into the Clinton column is Virginia. USA Wide analyzes data from all 50 states and uses a polling methodology that eliminates the liberal media bias.
There is so much projection involved in the creation of that term. The alt-right is an unfunny joke
Earliest use of the "cuck" term (in the political world) that I can remember was from a year or two ago before Trump was even officially in the race. I forget exactly what the caption was, but the picture involved Jeb and McCain naked/tied to chairs while watching a sombrero-wearing Hasidic Jew porking a woman.
Of course Virginia will got hilary, one of her crooked minions has given voting rights to thousands of felons. Terry McCauliff
Boys, we ain't seen nothing yet from the media. If the race continues to tighten its gonna be Katy bar the door for them.
http://www.cnn.com/2016/08/16/politics/navy-sailor-clinton-email-defense/
A Sailor tried using a Hillary Clinton defense when be was caught with classified photos on a private phone, even though he had clearance. Of course it didn't work...and the left still cheers as they believe it's okay to let some people be above the law.
A Sailor tried using a Hillary Clinton defense when be was caught with classified photos on a private phone, even though he had clearance. Of course it didn't work...and the left still cheers as they believe it's okay to let some people be above the law.
A less funny joke was that speech from Hillary Clinton denouncing the alt right. I wonder if she is getting worried- it smacked of desperation. The equivalent would be Trump giving a speech warning us about the Tumblr SJWs (who are basically the leftist version of the alt right).
oh, im thoroughly expecting a leak of the NYT editorial board audio tape if this race is remotely in play in early october
