Do you know what ethics are? It may not be illegal (doubtful), but it's sure as hell unethical.
POLITICAL THREAD
- Thread starter kybobcat
- Start date
Do you know what ethics are? It may not be illegal (doubtful), but it's sure as hell unethical.
pls don't hold me to lofty comedic standards like your sig or martin mull references
People keep asking moe questions like he will suddenly stop being an insufferable DNC whore. He is essentially one of those mouthpieces you see in the 4 box screen on MSNBC ranting about whatever the de facto spin of the day is straight from the party. He went seamlessly from Bernie to HRC....shouting about oligarchs one day and defending them the next. There is no compass with the guy. Put money on the dresser and down he goes.
![[laughing]](http://l.yimg.com/j/assets/img/emoticons/classic/laugh.r191677.gif "Laughing [laughing]")
Because it's the Clintons or does that hold for all foundations.
And this forum has been screaming "illegal" since 1911. Did you all really mean to scream "unethical!"
And a working girl has so much competition from the little tarts just giving it away.
Maybe Woodrow Wilson shouldnt have signed to allow the Federal Reserve.
Thanks Woodrow!!!
Look, it's a tacky, tasteless sculpture. The caption is the Emperor has no balls, as does the sculpture.
There would be an absolute shitstorm hissy fit from the left if this had been a sculpture of Hillary, shaming her body. You can take that to the bank.
Was the Martin Mull reference the "folk music scare"? I love that joke.
The sig and avatar are from Alice in Wonderland. No, I don't hold anyone to that standard.
I don't speak for anyone but myself. ANYONE that holds ANY elected or appointed office should NOT be taking donations from any government or business that represents another country.
It really shouldn't be that hard to understand why.
I thought the Emperor had no hands. After all the body shaming HRC has undergone, I think your all's current hissy fit is wonderful. Goose & gander. Turnabout is fair play. Etc.
Clinton has the usual concerns about her appearance but nothing quite as epic as Trump's. We don't need to search for surrogates to find examples of body-shaming. No the Lard Cheeto himself has indulged in those.
Remember the good old days when Rick Lazio couldn't even walk towards Hellary without being called sexist, and stores had to pull their Chia Obuma busts because they were racist...
![[eyeroll]](http://l.yimg.com/j/assets/img/emoticons/rolleye/rolleye0011.r191677.gif "Eye roll [eyeroll]")
No, you clearly don't understand.
Again there is this thing called ethics, and there is also something called conflict of interest.
Doing favors for leaders, businesses in return for donations to the foundation...unethical and quite possibly illegal.
So the New York City parks and rec immediately took the statue down? This political correctness bs has got to stop. What is this? The USSR?
I'm not a lawyer, but I have worked for enough companies and taken enough ethics courses, and classes to know when something isn't right. I say quite possibly because I'm not a lawyer and can't/won't speak in absolutes.
Is Moe really this dense? Reminds me of a 20 something that has no clue.
None but his speaking fees doubled with his wife as SOS. Just a coincidence?
Lewandowski then Manafort and now Bannon. Each one kookier and more controversial than the last.
But continue convincing yourselves that you're not getting trolled, Trumpers.
The Count of Monte Cristo has nothing on The Donald.
But continue convincing yourselves that you're not getting trolled, Trumpers.
The Count of Monte Cristo has nothing on The Donald.
Brian Williams was forced to resign as a news reader for fabricating a landing under fire story.
No one is having a hissy fit Moe, simply pointing out the double standard.
If there were several statues of Hillary with her tits sagging down to her knees, the media would be screaming sexist from the hilltops. There would be a campaign to remove them, and Trump would somehow be the culprit.
![[roll]](http://l.yimg.com/j/assets/img/emoticons/classic/roll.r191677.gif "roll [roll]")
There shouldn't be an investigation into any of the foundation dealings. We should just take HRC's word for it, she'd never lie.
Excellent point. And as we know through the glory of YouTube, she told that story numerous times. All a lie
I thought conservatives believed that the market determines what people are paid?
Below is from Forbes Magazine in 2008.
The Most Expensive Speeches
By the measure of history, a list of the greatest speakers includes names like Lincoln, King and Churchill.
But measure with cash, and other names, like Trump, Blair and Reagan, rise to the top. Their fame, charisma and rock-star appeal has enabled them to pull in more than $250,000 per speech, and propelled them to the top of our list of the most expensive speeches.
An examination of the highest speaking fees ever paid puts Donald Trump Donald Trump on top with the staggering $1.5 million the Learning Annex paid him for each speech he delivered at the company’s real estate “wealth expos” in 2006 and 2007, more than was earned from addresses by former U.S. President Ronald Reagan and former British Prime Minister Tony Blair.
There's a double standard when it comes to men's and women's bodies? Say it ain't so.
Similar threads
