POLITICAL THREAD
- Thread starter kybobcat
- Start date
Clearly they don't care, because they assisted in a civil war in Ukraine and assisted Assad. Now they've made energy deals with China. Like I said, the embargo is simply fluff to make us feel like we did something.
Sure. But a tax passed in 2012 absolutely demands Republican support. If the GOP didn't want it all they needed to was to filibuster. They sure knew how.
Takes credit for the sequestration savings even though he claimed they would crush us.
Brags about the tax increase while also dancing around the "balanced" phrase he liked to use.
About time you fake more guests coming...
If the GOP filibusters they are bad, if they don't they are bad.
/moeeveryothergoddamnedpost
/moeeveryothergoddamnedpost
Fluff. A bigger decline in GDP than we had in 2008-2009. You're blasé about it. How much did Bush's actions after the Georgia invasion cost Russia?
I see you understand how to be a (purposefully) dumb whore.
As with your "show your work" schtick. People give you links, hell even video, counter that way you say and you continue dancing like a $10 whore on a street corner.
What is it you wanted me to show?? The left attacking trump supporters in California? Or just a picture of you whining?
You didn't qualify your opening. Your source implied that Krugman hadn't changed his estimate of what was needed. Your argument is odd. More would have been positive but the GOP couldn't support it? I don't understand your conclusion.
You reached a conclusion about my remarks that I didn't see as supported by my actual words. I wanted to see how you had arrived at it.
People give links and video and yet don't construct actiual arguments. Or draw conclusions that actually follow from their evidence. And then sometimes appear angry when their personal attacks get turned into jokes.
![[thumb2]](https://ct.yimg.com/mr/uploads/891/1684387.png "Thumbs Up 2 [thumb2]")
I saw that she posted right after I did so I would assume in reply to me, but for your suggestion...I felt more and more ignorant after reading each post, so I had to block her.
You just agreed with me. hahaha
Then you threw in a "but". How can you agree with me and then disagree with me within one word? "Sure, but". Whaaaaa?
When I get a "yeah but". I know I am tapping into anxiety. Anxiety triggers self defense mechanisms. I'm sure you know this though. You being a Da Vincian Man.
Blocked him too. Never thought I'd block anyone. But it was beyond obvious they had no intention of engaging in any reasonable discussion.
Ah, I read Moe's stuff as a reminder. Would never put him on ignore. He's smart. Just odd smart, like you shouldn't trust him smart.
Reminds me of the UNC professor a couple years back, purported to be brilliant, that was catfished by an Argentine bikini model into being a drug mule.
http://abcnews.go.com/International...convicts-unc-professor-drug/story?id=17799280
The Dems carry convicted felons, those that fail to graduate hs, and academia at about the same dominant rate (70-80%)
It goes right with my post about them blaming Reagan and Bush for the economic woes we are experiencing now but, in the next breath, tell us how good we are doing now because of Obama and then say the president does not have anything to do tax increase policies which suggest they have nothing to do with the economy. I guess there are two sets of responsibility rules for each party.
Obama: only president since our second world war championship to never have one single year of over 3 percent GDP growth. great economic growth. continue bragging about Obama's economy. after his first 2 years of record people being laid off, he had no where to go but up. but did so slower than any other post recession recovery ever. let's brag about that.
I gave you numerous links and video to support very simple arguments and your response has been to ignore and rathole. I get it, you work Dem campaigns and have become accustomed to how they craft opinion backwards...much like an attorney, which you also are. The parties count on minions like you.
Last edited:
I have a working list of catpaw posters to apologize on behalf of if I ever meet GWB. I am sure they feel bad about what they said about his economy post 9/11 up until the Dems took Congress.
Was talking to a family member and she told me she wouldn't be surprised if Hillary cries or gets upset during one of the debates to try to make Trump look mean. I could see her doing something like that, the media would take up for her too.
I agree with Moe and James, about damn time we had a POTUS step up and do what the previous 4 presidents had not done....get Iran their cash*
*had to be cash because they said it had to be cash, also had to be that day because they said it had to be that day. We don't need Iran's nose-thumbing of parts of the agreement stop us from dancing when they say dance. This is how #lovewins
*had to be cash because they said it had to be cash, also had to be that day because they said it had to be that day. We don't need Iran's nose-thumbing of parts of the agreement stop us from dancing when they say dance. This is how #lovewins
Isn't it strange when a left winger makes a homophobic comment? I thought you guys supported the LGBT.
I'm surprised the video is only 70 minutes long
Similar threads
