POLITICAL THREAD
- Thread starter kybobcat
- Start date
You're such a pathetic joke. Every thing is the republicans fault. You're a disgusting political hack and apparently a homophobe.
The polls go from Donald being up by almost 10 points, to being down 10+ points, to being in a virtual dead heat all within 2 weeks. This is why I do not trust polls.
Think it is too early to call this over which some on here have already done.
OK. Here is my argument to support the videos I have posted: Hillary is a proven compulsive liar.
Disprove my case.
I agree. Anyone that thinks this is over is kidding themselves. I'm sure people in the media and people in Britain thought it was over when the polls were showing Brexit losing too. And look how that turned out.
Not a lawyer. Retired from working in computers. Programs demand rigid logic. As you well know.
He appears to have gotten back to the issues. I think he heard the criticism and knew he needed to change up. He sticks to the issues he can beat Hillary.
Moe defends Hillary like Germans defend Hitler.
Pretty eerie comparison
Pretty eerie comparison
Moe is David Alexrod like when it comes to being a hack.
These polls are crap. Some of them even state that they use projections based off of 2008 and 2012 voter turnout, specifically black turnout. Hillary will need at least 58% or more of AA to show up and vote for her to win this election. She's white, rich, and corrupt. It's not going to happen.
Get ready for the polls to tank just like Brexit.
Get ready for the polls to tank just like Brexit.
I did the same. Him and the other one were incapable of a reasonable discussion on here. They hijacked about 8 pages.
Brexit was a hoot because it just showed that the media & the SJWs are so far from reality. Any poll you see from the MSM just toss that in the garbage because it's a joke.
If the media thought it was over, they wouldn't spend so much time on Trump.
So you admit that I win that argument. Good for you. You finally got something right.
Here's your reward...
The Olympics are going to be a welcome break. The news is chock full of gloom and doom shit.
No way she cries. Media WILL light her up for that. Crying is not presidential.
FALSE. Learn modern day MSM. They will say that she cried because she loves this country sooo much that she is terrified that DT could be president and we would all die from syphilis infected AIDS.
The Iran nuclear deal was negotiated with 5 countries including Russia and very well might work. But dems complaining about Russian money in The Donald's campaign never seem to mention that fact.
Do you have a point or just trying to salvage Moe's honor? BTW, I don't watch Fox.
You think the embargo is hurting Russia, really? Who's following the embargo, you think China gives a damn about it? Hell no, they inked an energy deal with them. Guess what that does, it gives Russia leverage on Europe with its Natural Gas.
All we did was push them and China into an alliance.
Embargoes only work on Countries that don't have a military, are outgunned, or don't want to use the military option, none of those relate to Russia.
The United States had an agreement with Ukraine that if they handed over the nukes, we'd defend them. They stuck to their word, we didn't. How do you think the rest of our lesser allies feel now? You think Taiwan and China didn't take note? You think it's coincidence that Obama is weak and China happens to build unsinkable carriers in the middle of the Commerce rich South China Sea?
We are in dangerous territory right now. Russia and China are flexing their muscles, the world is in economic downturn, and we have a weak president.
Last two pages nothing but name calling and whining about putting another Democrat poster on ignore.
That's the Republican neanderthal blueprint. Name call, accuse the other person of name calling, then the dramatic announcement that they have never put anyone on ignore but simply are compelled to do so.
Really are a loathsome lot. Dumber than roofing nails and schooled in their religious madrasas to worship the rich and demonize the poor. As sorry a lot as you'll run across. I'd rather live around thieves and murderers as at least you know what they are.
That's the Republican neanderthal blueprint. Name call, accuse the other person of name calling, then the dramatic announcement that they have never put anyone on ignore but simply are compelled to do so.
Really are a loathsome lot. Dumber than roofing nails and schooled in their religious madrasas to worship the rich and demonize the poor. As sorry a lot as you'll run across. I'd rather live around thieves and murderers as at least you know what they are.
http://www.dailycaller.com/2016/08/...mmunities-hours-away-from-wealthy-dc-suburbs/
Virginia’s Syrian Refugees Resettled In Poor Communities Hours Away From Wealthy DC Suburbs
Virginia’s Syrian Refugees Resettled In Poor Communities Hours Away From Wealthy DC Suburbs
Thats hilarious coming from you, especially that last sentence.
Self awareness son, you're like a Bantee Rooster. You run around here pumping out your chest, crowing at everyone, wanting people to notice you.
http://dailysignal.com/2015/10/28/t...-ii-and-other-signs-of-the-militarys-decline/
U.S. Army is the smallest/weakest it has been since before WWII
U.S. Army is the smallest/weakest it has been since before WWII
Still, ignoring is lame.
Announcing you're ignoring someone is fanny pack levels of lame.
I agree, if you wanna ignore someone just do it.
Report: GOP strategists are getting ready to ditch Trump for the down ticket
...
Those plans exclude fully disavowing Trump (and potentially alienating his base), but include other coping mechanisms like accelerating the development of ads that distinguish GOP candidates from Trump — airing as soon as early next month — or possibly launching a large-scale ad campaign to support conventional Republican positions, thus bolstering the party itself instead of the party's nominee — or as the Times paraphrases one strategist's explanation, "to provide voters with a different, nonthreatening view of Republicans, so that the party is not wholly defined by Mr. Trump's day-to-day pronouncements."
http://www.aol.com/article/2016/08/...etting-ready-to-ditch-trump-for-the/21446403/
The rats are fleeing the sinking ship.
...
Those plans exclude fully disavowing Trump (and potentially alienating his base), but include other coping mechanisms like accelerating the development of ads that distinguish GOP candidates from Trump — airing as soon as early next month — or possibly launching a large-scale ad campaign to support conventional Republican positions, thus bolstering the party itself instead of the party's nominee — or as the Times paraphrases one strategist's explanation, "to provide voters with a different, nonthreatening view of Republicans, so that the party is not wholly defined by Mr. Trump's day-to-day pronouncements."
http://www.aol.com/article/2016/08/...etting-ready-to-ditch-trump-for-the/21446403/
The rats are fleeing the sinking ship.
What a complete summary of the left's decision making. They're all about these groups as long as they don't have to live around them. Real easy to pretend to be for these groups when you live in gated communities & don't have your jobs and neighborhood affected.
Every person and poltician who is for Syrians and open borders should have to house them in their homes and next door instead of importing the votes but passing the problems onto the regular folks.
Last edited:
To do that would be suicidal. That would put the House and Senate more in question than what it is now. A bunch of sore ass losers.
Not surprising. As pointed out, dems have "wonderful" ideas for everyone else to live by. Just not them.
Just like Obamacare and just like California Senate voting to exempt itself from California gun laws. That's right. You get to make the laws but you don't have to live by them.
http://www.redflagnews.com/headline...8-8-to-exempt-itself-from-california-gun-laws
Similar threads
