False.
Unlike you, I don’t let elections dictate my self-worth. I smoke dope and party every day, no matter who’s in the White House.
I am similar to you, however, in that I get to talk about our elected officials in any manner I choose.
Trump is an idiot, AOC is the college sophomore know-it-all at the family holiday meals, Hillary was a shitty nomination, and Obama is making hella $$$$$$$$$$ as a US citizen while you’re busy being “a hater and a loser.”
You’d think that having your boy Trump in office would make you happier. Chill, warrior-cat, chill...
You can change your name as many times as you wish, but your posts still suck. Pitiful, plum pitiful.Kinda like Trump, right? SMH.
We’ll never see this level of ignorance in the Oval Office again after 2024.
Well actually we probably will. You nutjobs would vote for Don Jr. in a heartbeat! LOLOLOL
Stick to the promised CRENSHAW/HALEY TICKET and keep slurping those talking points. Republicans sold out their party for Donald Trump. Even Crenshaw would be an improvement, and he’s a bum who favors imported scotch over legalizing some good ol’ fashioned American marijuana.
Does he even love our country?
Yea, I am starting to think John is more full of shit than a Christmas Turkey.Which is it? Are you running drugs south of the border 5 days a week or are you sitting at a desk? Nevermind. It's pretty clear what we're dealing with here. Just a distorted thinking liberal looking to manifest whatever image is needed for the argument at the moment. He's a document immigrant with a driver's license in one post, a fortune 500 business exec in another. Free entertainment chucklehead.
If he/she/it is really a teacher, it is no surprise that our children are dumber than rocks.Seems spot-on to me. Unduly elitist, shockingly uninformed, over-opinionted and seeking approval for right-think that is actually detrimental to his own well-being. I bet he has students as friends, too, and some of them only refer to him by his last name b/c they think that's just so cool. He feels so accepted.
I know this guy. He's every cuck male teacher my kids have ever had. I bet he's smallish in frame, wears sweaters that are too tight, sits on his hands and swings his legs in a chair like a schoolgirl and tries to push shitty emo music on middle schoolers who he thinks he's enlightening. I also would wager he has a beard and it is, by far, THE most manly thing about him, which is why he clings to it.
I'd put money on it.
KABOOM!** KA-BOOM! **
Trump’s economic approval hits highest level in a year as Americans remain split on impeachment.
- Forty-five percent of Americans disapprove of Congress impeaching President Trump and 44% approve, according to the CNBC All-America Economic Survey.
- The survey shows 49% of Americans approving of the president’s handling of the economy, up from 42% in September and the highest level in a year.
- The poll of 800 Americans nationwide was conducted Dec. 10-13.
#MAGA.
Go jump your loon ass into Salt Lick Creek.
"But the latest numbers still leave Trump with a higher approval rating than former President Barack Obama when he left office in January 2017.".KABOOM!
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...-syracuse-a9251161.html?utm_source=reddit.com
However, it appears the feeling is not necessarily mutual. A poll of 1,630 active duty troops conducted by US forces publication Military Times in conjunction with Syracuse University found 49.9 per cent of respondents had an unfavourable view of the president — with 45.1 per cent expressing their view as very unfavourable.
The Democratic Party is now a thug outfit that willfully ignores the spirit of the constitution to grab power and be a guerrilla army inside the American government. They don’t care about justice or fairness, that may seem like rhetoric but it’s unfortunately very accurate.So, serious question.
In an impeachment trial, Senators are the jury, correct?
5 of them(Biden, Warren, Booker, Sanders, Klobuchar) are Democrats currently seeking the nomination to run against Trump, who is in this instance the Defendant.
I believe it is the duty of a juror who has a conflict of interest or who cannot be impartial to bring the facts or issues causing that conflict to the attention of the court and recuse himself.
So why are these 5 allowed to sit in judgment of the man who they hope to defeat in an election in 11 months?
Clearly they have a vested interest in the outcome, and benefit from a conviction of Trump.
I mean, if it were a civil trial involving business corruption, and say a CEO of a corporation was on trial and a conviction would really hurt that company, would executives from 5 of that company's biggest competitors be allowed to sit on that jury?
What am I missing here? Why isn't this being discussed? Why isnt this a trial with 95 jurors instead of 100?
KABOOM!
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...-syracuse-a9251161.html?utm_source=reddit.com
However, it appears the feeling is not necessarily mutual. A poll of 1,630 active duty troops conducted by US forces publication Military Times in conjunction with Syracuse University found 49.9 per cent of respondents had an unfavourable view of the president — with 45.1 per cent expressing their view as very unfavourable.
What am I missing here? Why isn't this being discussed? Why isnt this a trial with 95 jurors instead of 100?
"But the latest numbers still leave Trump with a higher approval rating than former President Barack Obama when he left office in January 2017.".
![]()
LOL, what a bunch of foolish people. If they think dressing up in black will cause the black voters who left the Democrat Party to come back they are screwed. It ain't happening.
Is it the same Dumbo rats that dressed in white KU klux klan outfits during the SOU speech?LOL, what a bunch of foolish people. If they think dressing up in black will cause the black voters who left the Democrat Party to come back they are screwed. It ain't happening.
Biden is not a Senator. Other than that, didn't miss much at all.In an impeachment trial, Senators are the jury, correct?
5 of them(Biden, Warren, Booker, Sanders, Klobuchar) are Democrats currently seeking the nomination to run against Trump, who is in this instance the Defendant.
What am I missing here??
So, serious question.
In an impeachment trial, Senators are the jury, correct?
5 of them(Biden, Warren, Booker, Sanders, Klobuchar) are Democrats currently seeking the nomination to run against Trump, who is in this instance the Defendant.
I believe it is the duty of a juror who has a conflict of interest or who cannot be impartial to bring the facts or issues causing that conflict to the attention of the court and recuse himself.
So why are these 5 allowed to sit in judgment of the man who they hope to defeat in an election in 11 months?
Clearly they have a vested interest in the outcome, and benefit from a conviction of Trump.
I mean, if it were a civil trial involving business corruption, and say a CEO of a corporation was on trial and a conviction would really hurt that company, would executives from 5 of that company's biggest competitors be allowed to sit on that jury?
What am I missing here? Why isn't this being discussed? Why isnt this a trial with 95 jurors instead of 100?
False, guaranteed.KABOOM!
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...-syracuse-a9251161.html?utm_source=reddit.com
However, it appears the feeling is not necessarily mutual. A poll of 1,630 active duty troops conducted by US forces publication Military Times in conjunction with Syracuse University found 49.9 per cent of respondents had an unfavourable view of the president — with 45.1 per cent expressing their view as very unfavourable.