Sounds like a good thing that Libs disproportionately missed out on the gains.
POLITICAL THREAD
- Thread starter kybobcat
- Start date
Yea well, he tried to keep muslim terrorists out but you guys fought that all the way.
I know right? F only we had an actual Muslim ban, we’d been good.
No you aren’t... no one is punished more by your thinking than you yourself
this edd account sounds like a troll on the Soros payroll
I want that ****ing Arab who shot those people up to get the chair
that's rich considering the economy is absolutely booming and were in peace times
She looks hands-bound, blindfolded and out on a plank with a sword in her back... b/c she is.
Well. Did you read that post from Ed?P - Ray Lewis was exonerated of those two deaths. If you feel justice was not served you can feel free to express and debate that on here if you like.
I have a job to do here and we simple don't want people expressing death threats against public officials. As you can see by the various responses it was not only upsetting to other members, but is desensitizes violence. That's what my note was about. I hope you understand the reasoning for that and I'm sure you don't want to see that type of thing as well. Thanks.
BTW I'm an Independent![[winking]](http://l.yimg.com/j/assets/img/emoticons/classic/wink.r191677.gif "Winking [winking]")
Adam Schiff, you blithering idiot. Don't you realize that rational people also see and hear your statements?
Are you not able to see the changes that have occurred under Trump, along with his campaign promises of building a wall, giving a tax cut, fixing health care, undoing NAFTA, making NATO allies pay their fair share, and draining the swamp, are all measures to make America BETTER than it was becoming?
You can tell us red is blue but the only ones who will believe you are the color blind and the idiots.
This Saudi stuff is getting old.
How stupid are we?
How stupid are we?
it's not stupidity is ultra tolerance and it's by design
I think her pointy things are great - and none are between her legs.
I can think of about 3000+ ex New Yorkers who'd like to have had a ban in place 20 years ago.
Too easy. Drawn & quartered after his entrails are in his mouth & his d!ck cut off. A little waterboarding first would be good too.
I'm ok letting them think we're stupid. Meanwhile, the courts are turning conservative and the Dems are gift wrapping the POTUS and House elections for US. Its all good... just let it play out.
Just did a deep dive into Black Jeopardy from SNL on Youtube. This is my favorite, as it demonstrates white Trump supporters and Blacks have a lot in common (except for that final jeopardy subject, of course).
They were not saying that about their savior Obama. He did everything.
because even she despite being a die hard liberal isn't a complete lawless lunatic and has a shred of integrity left
No other conclusion but RBG and her artificially preserved brain implanted in a robot has been corrupted and is helping Trump be above the law.
P - Ray Lewis was exonerated of those two deaths. If you feel justice was not served you can feel free to express and debate that on here if you like.
I have a job to do here and we simple don't want people expressing death threats against public officials. As you can see by the various responses it was not only upsetting to other members, but is desensitizes violence. That's what my note was about. I hope you understand the reasoning for that and I'm sure you don't want to see that type of thing as well. Thanks.
BTW I'm an Independent
Understood. many people felt o j was guilty of murder too but actually he was exonerated. congrats on being an independent.
It’s greed. she wants more money, more power. there can never be enough for people like her.
Even their new excuse is bogus.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi argued Thursday that President Donald Trump violated the fundamental principle of the Constitution by saying in an interview that Article II allowed him to “do whatever I want.”
Here is what Pelosi said after announcing the Democrat’s intent to impeach the president:
The president’s actions have seriously violated the Constitution, especially when he says and acts upon the belief ‘Article II says I can do whatever I want.’ No. His wrongdoing strikes at the very heart of our Constitution. A separation of powers, three co-equal branches, each a check and balance on the other.
She repeated the claim in a CNN town hall on Thursday:
In that Constitution, the genius of it all was the system of checks and balances. They did not want a monarch. They did not want a president king. That’s what they fought the war against.
The president said — Article I is the legislative branch. Article II is the executive branch. The president said, Article II says I can do whatever I want.
So for me, this is about honoring our oath of office, making sure that the Constitution is respected. And it’s about that and how he has ignored the subpoenas of Congress, the oversight of Congress. Something very strange there, that there hasn’t been an intervention amongst some of his own people.
Pelosi said Trump was betraying the Founders and the Constitution by acting as a “king” or a “monarch,” using references to the monarchy five times in her impeachment statement and at least six times in the CNN town hall.
But Pelosi is taking the president out of context. The Trump comment about Article II is taken from a June interview with ABC News host George Stephanopoulos.
Trump said:
Look, Article II, I would be allowed to fire Robert Mueller. Assuming I did all of the things, I said I want to fire him. Number one, I didn’t. He wasn’t fired. Number one, very importantly but more importantly, Article II allows me to do whatever I want. Article II would allow me to fire him. I wasn’t going to fire him. You know why — because I watched Richard Nixon firing everybody and that didn’t work out too well.
Pelosi is hanging the case for impeachment on a badly misconstrued quote. As the duly elected president of the United States, Donald Trump has the authority to hire and fire anybody in his administration.
Trump correctly cited his authority given to him by Article II to allow him to fire Special Counsel Robert Mueller, even though he never did. The president did not cite Article II to make the case that he was above the separation of powers in the Constitution.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi argued Thursday that President Donald Trump violated the fundamental principle of the Constitution by saying in an interview that Article II allowed him to “do whatever I want.”
Here is what Pelosi said after announcing the Democrat’s intent to impeach the president:
The president’s actions have seriously violated the Constitution, especially when he says and acts upon the belief ‘Article II says I can do whatever I want.’ No. His wrongdoing strikes at the very heart of our Constitution. A separation of powers, three co-equal branches, each a check and balance on the other.
She repeated the claim in a CNN town hall on Thursday:
In that Constitution, the genius of it all was the system of checks and balances. They did not want a monarch. They did not want a president king. That’s what they fought the war against.
The president said — Article I is the legislative branch. Article II is the executive branch. The president said, Article II says I can do whatever I want.
So for me, this is about honoring our oath of office, making sure that the Constitution is respected. And it’s about that and how he has ignored the subpoenas of Congress, the oversight of Congress. Something very strange there, that there hasn’t been an intervention amongst some of his own people.
Pelosi said Trump was betraying the Founders and the Constitution by acting as a “king” or a “monarch,” using references to the monarchy five times in her impeachment statement and at least six times in the CNN town hall.
But Pelosi is taking the president out of context. The Trump comment about Article II is taken from a June interview with ABC News host George Stephanopoulos.
Trump said:
Look, Article II, I would be allowed to fire Robert Mueller. Assuming I did all of the things, I said I want to fire him. Number one, I didn’t. He wasn’t fired. Number one, very importantly but more importantly, Article II allows me to do whatever I want. Article II would allow me to fire him. I wasn’t going to fire him. You know why — because I watched Richard Nixon firing everybody and that didn’t work out too well.
Pelosi is hanging the case for impeachment on a badly misconstrued quote. As the duly elected president of the United States, Donald Trump has the authority to hire and fire anybody in his administration.
Trump correctly cited his authority given to him by Article II to allow him to fire Special Counsel Robert Mueller, even though he never did. The president did not cite Article II to make the case that he was above the separation of powers in the Constitution.
House Ds undermining Pelosi, speaking to CNN only on the condition of anonymity and questioning impeachment.
Who didn't see this coming after two defected during the first vote? Only question now is how many more will join them.
Democrat Rep: "I am struggling to see how the evidence supports impeachment"
https://gop.com/democrat-rep-i-am-struggling-to-see-how-the-evidence-supports-impeachment
Source article from CNN.
Some moderate Democrats feel frustrated as party leaders start writing articles of impeachment
https://www.cnn.com/2019/12/06/politics/moderate-democrats-impeachment-leadership/index.html
Who didn't see this coming after two defected during the first vote? Only question now is how many more will join them.
Democrat Rep: "I am struggling to see how the evidence supports impeachment"
https://gop.com/democrat-rep-i-am-struggling-to-see-how-the-evidence-supports-impeachment
Source article from CNN.
Some moderate Democrats feel frustrated as party leaders start writing articles of impeachment
https://www.cnn.com/2019/12/06/politics/moderate-democrats-impeachment-leadership/index.html
Similar threads
