This is as hopeless as the Russia hoax. It would never hold up in a court. How many times are you going to be duped?
POLITICAL THREAD
- Thread starter kybobcat
- Start date
This is as hopeless as the Russia hoax. It would never hold up in a court. How many times are you going to be duped?
My assertion is just as good as yours, probably better.
Personal records: You would hide yours too
A drummed up Impeachment cry which started 19 minutes into his Presidency with false and fake made up lies.
Ignoring subpoena's at the advice of lawyers who knew testimony would be misquoted and misrepresented. Fact
Self defense after people attack his character (Ignorant of you on this one or disingenuous stance)
False on Barr
Firing people who stabbed him in the back for traitorous behavior probably for money.
You pretty much run the liberal media playbook here.
Far left talking points for starters. They have been proved to be lying and falsifying records and testimony.
Because, read my lips, They are nobody’s damn business
Riiiight. Because innocent people totally don't argue the merit of their case and simply claim "executive immunity." Because hush money is something the government has absolutely no right to investigate...
Is that anything like P_SS on a Go rilla? (I am scared to try to look it up.)
There is nothing to refute. Everything you posted has been falsely reported and dismissed for the most part. You believe what the left has told you happened and not what actually happened. You are dismissed.
I have noticed anytime any Eptsein didn't kill himself memes are posted, no resident liberals ever "like" any of the post? almost as if liberals support pedophilia?
if you can't kill the baby, then molest the kid a few years later is the liberal way.
if you can't kill the baby, then molest the kid a few years later is the liberal way.
He tried that with the transcript but the left did not want that. They chose a "Parody" AKA lies and misinformation and have done their job well with people like you so, Trump does not want to give them more truths to exploit for the ignorant such as your self.
So is the "he is hiding something" stance without any real proof, just hear say by people already having been proved to be lying.
@pyrrhicgorilla
You can cherry pick all the media cherry picked disinformation you want. When it comes down to it, they all admitted that they don't have any first hand knowledge, that they're assuming and offering their opinion. That's not proof anything.
A third hand account can't corroborated a second hand account. You can't corroborate a rumor with a rumor. That's not evidence. They've offered up zero evidence to prove their second/third/fourth hand accusations. Some of their testimony runs counter their accusations.
I've already linked Sondland admitting it for you. Here are Volker and Taylor.
Volker: "You asked what conversations did I have about that quid pro quo, et cetera. None, because I didn't know that there was a quid pro quo." ... "I believe he [Taylor] was asking this based on the Politico article. And I discussed with him that there is no linkage here."
--------------------------------------------
Ex-envoy denied Trump linked Ukraine meeting to push for investigations, transcripts show
Former U.S. envoy to Ukraine Kurt Volker, according to transcripts released Tuesday, pushed back on the claim that President Trump sought to withhold a meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky until Kiev committed to investigate allegations concerning the 2016 election -- while also denying that Trump was seeking “dirt” on former Vice President Joe Biden.
In a transcript of his closed-door deposition last month with lawmakers conducting the impeachment probe, Volker was asked if Trump withheld or delayed a meeting with Zelensky absent a pledge to probe concerns Ukraine had interfered in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
“The answer to the question is no, if you want a yes-or-no answer. But the reason the answer is no is we did have difficulty scheduling a meeting, but there was no linkage like that,” he said.
----------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------
ZELDIN: “So do you have any other source that the president’s goal in making this request was anything other than The New York Times?”
TAYLOR: “I have not talked to the president. I have no other information from what the president was thinking."
-----------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------
Zeldin to Taylor:
"You're telling us that Tim Morrison told you that Ambassador Sondland told him that the President told Ambassador Sondland that Zelensky would have to open an investigation into Biden?"
Taylor: That's correct.
-------------------------------------
You can cherry pick all the media cherry picked disinformation you want. When it comes down to it, they all admitted that they don't have any first hand knowledge, that they're assuming and offering their opinion. That's not proof anything.
A third hand account can't corroborated a second hand account. You can't corroborate a rumor with a rumor. That's not evidence. They've offered up zero evidence to prove their second/third/fourth hand accusations. Some of their testimony runs counter their accusations.
I've already linked Sondland admitting it for you. Here are Volker and Taylor.
Volker: "You asked what conversations did I have about that quid pro quo, et cetera. None, because I didn't know that there was a quid pro quo." ... "I believe he [Taylor] was asking this based on the Politico article. And I discussed with him that there is no linkage here."
--------------------------------------------
Ex-envoy denied Trump linked Ukraine meeting to push for investigations, transcripts show
Former U.S. envoy to Ukraine Kurt Volker, according to transcripts released Tuesday, pushed back on the claim that President Trump sought to withhold a meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky until Kiev committed to investigate allegations concerning the 2016 election -- while also denying that Trump was seeking “dirt” on former Vice President Joe Biden.
In a transcript of his closed-door deposition last month with lawmakers conducting the impeachment probe, Volker was asked if Trump withheld or delayed a meeting with Zelensky absent a pledge to probe concerns Ukraine had interfered in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
“The answer to the question is no, if you want a yes-or-no answer. But the reason the answer is no is we did have difficulty scheduling a meeting, but there was no linkage like that,” he said.
----------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------
ZELDIN: “So do you have any other source that the president’s goal in making this request was anything other than The New York Times?”
TAYLOR: “I have not talked to the president. I have no other information from what the president was thinking."
-----------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------
Zeldin to Taylor:
"You're telling us that Tim Morrison told you that Ambassador Sondland told him that the President told Ambassador Sondland that Zelensky would have to open an investigation into Biden?"
Taylor: That's correct.
-------------------------------------
What point? You have not proved a thing and that was his point. Claiming victory after being shown you never crossed the finish line is the sign of a loser.
It already has been which is why I posted you were misrepresenting. The obvious point is you will not admit it.
It's almost like the guy isn't reading the real evidence. Ya know, have to give the guy credit. He is good at sticking to the bullshit dnc talking points to try to counter the evidence.
Not sure why he is wasting his time here. He should go to Reddit and spread crap with other Trump haters
Again, that doesn’t say anything about investigating Biden. Are you now saying he can’t even mention Bidens corruption?
If Bloomberg is jumping in that shows how little faith the moderates have in dementia joe. Clinton will be back in soon.
Liberals support all forms of degeneracy. Some are still too ashamed to admit it, but they won't say anything against it. Whether actively or passively, they all want it normalized.
Never forget liberals hate ICE...wonder why?
Don’t be naive, NY is corrupt. They want his taxes, and this is how they’re trying to get them.
They will do whatever they have to do to get them, and put anyone in jail necessary.
It's not NY. It's SDNY. More NY counties voted Trump except NYC.
Any clue who the person that is pushing that shit? Oh yeah. MAURENE COMEY NIECE TO TRAITOR JAMES COMEY.
I don’t drink near as much or as often as I used to.
Wanna smoke crack? Better than booze
Yeah- been there many times. It WAS a cool town- until the city decided to incentivize homelessness.
Good on them? Those dollars help get them off the street? Hardly.
You probably ought to read up on the subject- or to see it yourself.
I honestly don’t understand why these lefties post here. This has been thoroughly debunked a thousand time, and a thousand time more by Dwayne since gorilla made that post.
Every conservative in this thread is educated on the situation. I thank Dwayne for that.
if you lefties hate Donald trump, just say that. I hate earthy Pinot noirs. I think soup is a stupid food. Etc.
Orange man is bad. We get it. It’s your preference.
But continuously making up lies and remaining willfully ignorant is literally mentally retarded. I know people can’t say retarded these days, but you guys literally are slow in the mind.
