POLITICAL THREAD
- Thread starter kybobcat
- Start date
While the libs are out political stunting, cocaine mitch is still at work
If Trump were to commit perjury for a blow job, at least it would be a Russian or Ukrainian doing the dirty work:
“We’ve done a lot for youz Ukrainians . . and we’ve not gotten anything in return . . . and youz need missiles to fight the Russians . . . so do you swallow or spit?”
“We’ve done a lot for youz Ukrainians . . and we’ve not gotten anything in return . . . and youz need missiles to fight the Russians . . . so do you swallow or spit?”
As evil as Pelosi is, shes not a complete idiot...she knows how risky impeachment is. Dems will regret letting AOC be their voice to push her over
Mitch has reportedly done nothing to stop this line of inquiry!!
“Cocaine Mitch?”
“Meth Mitch” would be more alliterative!
This is not an intelligence matter. It is a policy matter and a complaint about differences over policy. Presidential phone calls are not an intelligence concern. The fact that IC officers transcribe these calls does not give the IC IG jusrisdiction over these calls.
And this here is why the DNI was not required by law to turn the complaint over to Congress.
Not to mention, because it was also second/third hand uncorroboated rumor.
No, that's just the opposite of what I stated dumbass, but there is no corruption that's been pointed out against Trump. The President asking a foreign leader to corroborate with an investigation into corruption, is not corrupt. You use assumptions toward Trump, to actual first hand knowledge against the Democrats.
The Democrats have been screaming for impeachment since election day, that is different than investigating something after it happened such as Benghazi where a US ambassador was freaking killed.
I'm not pointing or deflecting, the transcripts entire point is because the whistleblower thought it was going after political opponents. What Trump mentioned was Biden's corruption, that's the reason.
What has Trump done anywhere close to level of what Biden bragged about?
By end of tomorrow will we know the identity?
Also, like last time, will the media out the source then turn around and try to blame the WH for outing the source?
Also, like last time, will the media out the source then turn around and try to blame the WH for outing the source?
1 didn't watch 1 second of any debate
2. I didn't even vote for obama
3. They went after Biden because he was the front runner
Democrats have been trying to get trump since before he was elected...they would have already found everything if there was anything.
They have nothing again...evidenced by their editing the transcript or ppl like Schiff just completely making statements up. Their constituents are dumb enough to buy it again tho.
But theres no standard...can we dig up Bidens transcripts. What all did he say to Ukraine?
They have nothing again...evidenced by their editing the transcript or ppl like Schiff just completely making statements up. Their constituents are dumb enough to buy it again tho.
But theres no standard...can we dig up Bidens transcripts. What all did he say to Ukraine?
At least then he would have actually committed a crime and given the feral loons something to be outraged about.
So far, for three years straight, we've seen nothing but deranged hysteria over false accusations.
You really think Biden was the front runner? With all his gaffes, pussing out to Harris, flip flopping on everything, 40 years of voting history in the Senate?
Dude was a puppet, even Obama told him not to run because the party needed new blood. He was propped up for this moment, that's all.
Yep. The media literally had to purposely omit 500+ words from the transcript in order to connect two sentences that were totally and completely unrelated just to make this look like a scandal.
And Schiff? Well that clearly speaks for itself. Parody.
This is not an intelligence matter. It is a policy matter and a complaint about differences over policy. Presidential phone calls are not an intelligence concern. The fact that IC officers transcribe these calls does not give the IC IG jusrisdiction over these calls.
To touch on this some more. Since, according to the DOJ/DNI, the whistleblower complaint is actually outside of the whistleblower framework and is being categorized as a non-intelligence matter, wonder if that puts the whistleblower outside of the whistleblower protection framework too?
Those protections are supposed to be in place for legit whistleblowers on intelligence matters, not for partisan, rumor mongers spreading second hand info about policy they dislike.
Why aren't the WH officials who supposedly told the whistleblower this information speaking up and blowing the whistle themselves?
If it's such a matter of national security, abuse of power and threat to democracy, then why are they staying silent and instead playing a game of telephone with second/third hand information?
If it's such a matter of national security, abuse of power and threat to democracy, then why are they staying silent and instead playing a game of telephone with second/third hand information?
If Trump signs this then he can take that America First slogan and burn it along with my support. Millions of us spend our time and money defending him. I just wonder if he will defend us.
![[winking]](http://l.yimg.com/j/assets/img/emoticons/classic/wink.r191677.gif "Winking [winking]")
"If Trump is the most dangerous and corrupt president in history like we've all been assured... if he truly is all he's ever been accused of, then why are the Democrats so desperate and having to stoop so low for a reason to impeach?"
No, people like you have been allowing lies for years to try and over throw a legal sitting president. An illegal coup which you have been cheering on. Treasonous is what you are.
False, the swamp has protected them for years and are in too deep. Plus the Clinton mafia would have them killed if they tried. Fact!.
Utterly and completely False. Non fact based opinions and flat out lies. Why does he (Schiff) need to lie to elicit a response. Did you think about that before posting. That's idiotic.
Good Lord...someone who works for the POTUS says something is hearsay...makes it true.![[roll]](http://l.yimg.com/j/assets/img/emoticons/classic/roll.r191677.gif "roll [roll]")
Today, not only did we find out, for a fact, that it was mostly all second hand hearsay, but we also learned that a good portion of the complaint was third hand b.s. based on anonymously sourced media articles. Absolutely none of whistlblower's complaint was based on first hand information. Keep up the good work, comrade.
Similar threads
