POLITICAL THREAD
- Thread starter kybobcat
- Start date
No and I'm telling you you need a mirror bad. There have been all kinds of articles about the added strain on the water supplies by an increasing population and an increasing agriculture industry and which is the priority. Dumb is thinking because you haven't read it, it hasn't been written fool.
If Dems get control of the WH and senate they 100% should pack the court. Republicans play dirty and to win, bout time Dems learned to do the same. McConnell took the SCOTUS fight to a new level and it will escalate again. Add 6 new justices and dominate SCOTUS rulings for a few years. Maybe that would be enough to convince both sides to return to a permanent 2/3s vote again and some kind of respectful normalcy.
You really are retarded. Mitch did what your boy Harry Reid set up to use. Spare me they stole a seat. It was a Presidential election year. And guess what Americans decided they didn't want a POS liberal on the court or they would of voted Hillary.
You can thank Harry for allowing this to happen moron.
A few articles yes. But most of those articles circle back around to climate change and all but dismiss population growth. The same way you just did in the post above.
How does the population growth issue factor in to Cali's plans to fix the problem? Do they even consider it?
Point is that it doesn't take a genius or a scientist to figure out that if you take a natural resource that is in short supply...and then add more and more people to the list of people using said resource...then you are compounding the problem exponentially. It's not a sustainable course of action regardless of the reason for the shortage.
And they aren't effectively addressing that particular part of the equation. When it's the one tangible thing that they actually have control over. Why? Because it doesn't fit the agenda of open borders. And it doesn't fit the agenda of climate change.
Open your eyes, man.
Can return to permanent 2/3 vote after Pubs get in office again and further pack court in their direction. If not, in a 100 years we could have several K SC members.
A
anon_l8pbkn96tg3j6
Guest
What the hell. Actually read that article, it is terrifying. Court packing is OK because it was done when the country was new and geographically expanding, and when the country was at war with itself. Court packing is bad because in these 7 examples, it was used by authoritarians to consolidate their power. But remember, the left might want to stack the court to ram through shit nobody wants, but Trump is the evil monarch Nazi. By the way, if you get the votes to confirm your 30 lefty justices, why not just pass laws?
The "scholar" advocating court packing wrote a book "It's Time to Fight Dirty" where he also advocates splitting California into 3 states, and statehood for Puerto Rico specifically for electoral college stacking. If you actually want another Civil War, change the rules of the game. Pack the court and change the electoral map to guarantee victory for your side. I'm sure it will go over well with the rest of the country.
Both houses of Congress, statehouse across the country in a historic shift over BO's term, plus resounding electoral victory despite being heavily outspent including states like WI, MI, and PA....and the biggest driver has not been GOP policy but rejection of smarmy c-suckers like you. Congrats!
Paul Manafort sitting in solitary confinement for 23 hours a day as Hillary and the many other crooks from the Obama admin walk around free is a joke.
![[laughing]](http://l.yimg.com/j/assets/img/emoticons/classic/laugh.r191677.gif "Laughing [laughing]")
Didn’t say jack-shit about Trump colluding with Russia. Liberal pieces of shit just don’t get it.
Liberals playing the role of Freddy Kruger in Martin Luther King Jr’s dream.
Though any of the finalists for Trumps SCOTUS picks would be good picks, I'm kind of hoping for Amy Barrett myself. Seems to me like she could be like a female Scalia. That would be a home run IMO.
There’s actually a lot packed in here in so little of an exchange. The left projects it’s own racist tendencies on others, assuming everyone must be as racist as they are and the right gets pissed off it has to defend itself against baseless accusations only appropriate against its extreme, which it routinely disowns, while the left unabashedly fully embraces its extremists.
Also, as perhaps this thread’s only actual European, there is plenty wrong with European ideas and culture and America has its own distinct, exceptional culture. The left’s notion that we don’t have a culture here is patently absurd.
What a joke. They might as well mark every photo as potentially offensive. You know someone out there is just dying to be offended by whatever is posted.
Two bad half of them don't even belong in this country.
Guess what, electoral college is a law.
Shut up stupid liberal. Trump is your President.
Wanna cry?
How much water could they have if they had spent half as much on desalination plants as they have on green energy?
And guess what Levi, we are going to continue to lock up, depot, and get POS illegal criminals off and out of this country.
Tomorrow is the big day for the Supreme Court announcement. Liberals will keep us entertained for months with their hate and obstruction tactics. The nominee will be called every evil thing a lib can dream up.
It will be one of the nastiest fights in a long time no doubt. The dems and Hollywood libs will literally try everything in the book to stop the nominee. Even if it gets people hurt or killed.
They can’t because they’ve hamstrung themselves by decommissioning fossil power plants.
Desalination takes ALOT of electricity.
You lose all credibility with that. California alone could have drummed up 3 million Trump votes if they would have bothered, but they stay home because they have no chance to beat liberal presidential candidates in the People’s Republic of California.
This guy is no liberal just in case you want to know how completely FU you are:
https://www.salon.com/2018/07/05/ca...cts-dire-consequences-for-trump-putin-summit/
https://www.salon.com/2018/07/05/ca...cts-dire-consequences-for-trump-putin-summit/
This was a republican strategist not a liberal:
“Trump didn’t destroy the Republican Party—it’s the cowardice of the Republican leaders, their complicity in all of it, the lack of courage to stand up for what's right."
https://www.thedailybeast.com/steve-schmidt-mccains-campaign-chief-quits-indecent-and-immoral-gop
“Trump didn’t destroy the Republican Party—it’s the cowardice of the Republican leaders, their complicity in all of it, the lack of courage to stand up for what's right."
https://www.thedailybeast.com/steve-schmidt-mccains-campaign-chief-quits-indecent-and-immoral-gop
Similar threads
