POLITICAL THREAD
- Thread starter kybobcat
- Start date
I said this when Ben Shapiro and the Never Trump RINOs continued to hope for Trump to lose. How could they not see this? The SCOTUS was the most important thing at play, which protects the 2A, something that Dems would love to get rid of if they could.
Shapiro and the Never Trumpers failed to realize a few things.
1. Hillary would have flooded our nation with the third world and tried to give them amnesty. Republicans would never win another election.
2. The 2A would have been in play in Hillary's second term.
3. The typical GOP candidate of Bush/McCain/Romney types was not going to win this election. That mold wasn't going to work this time. Trump was a fighter. We didn't need another person who let the media destroy them without hitting back and was soft on his candidate like McCain/Romney were and then spouted some bible verses and then wonder why we lost yet again.
As great as it is to see Gowdy and Jordan make these lying POS' look bad on TV, deep down we all know the truth about how far the DNC/FBI/DOJ/deep-state went to both not allow Trump to win and to get him impeached. The corruption in the govt on both sides is simply too deep and too entangled for the truth to ever come out. There will be some sacrificial lambs, but the corruption that anyone with half an iota of common sense can see will never be proven. The establishment can't let it. It will bring them all down.
Remember that time Strzok said he had nothing to hide and was willing to answer all questions in order to clear his name?
Just don’t think the Supreme Court pick will be a white male. A women regardless of color or Nationality , is probably a safer bet. Won’t matter to Democrats as they won’t support the nomination regardless.
To be fair, the Democrats have been divided for some time. Most notably after their own party cheated Bernie out of the nomination.
I bet at least two dems will vote for the next Supreme Ct. pick so long as the GOP has enough votes to confirm on their own (meaning Collins & Murkowski vote for the pick). Several dems from deep red states will be up for election just weeks after they cast their votes and they will want to play ball (Manchin D-WV and Donnelly D-IN probably).
As far as it being a woman, there are only a few on Trump's list (see below) who are the right age (45-55). Several of those are openly hostile to Roe v. Wade. That is the one issue that would cause Murkowski and Collins to vote against the nominee. So Amy Barrett may be a non-starter for those two.
https://www.npr.org/2018/06/28/6239...nate-new-supreme-court-justice-from-this-list
Last edited:
Diversity in action...
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/06/2...king-photos-victim-after-knocked-him-out.html
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/06/2...king-photos-victim-after-knocked-him-out.html
Stuff like this never gets circulated and widely covered by media but the leftist networks will talk about the Starbucks guys and Clock Boy and "poop swastika" around the clock.
I called it yesterday. Didn’t I say that without a doubt, there would be some new distraction today, a shooting or accusation and BOOM!
The timing of these are so unbelievable. Anyone seriously believe we don’t have psy-ops shit?
Sheppard Smith just reported that NYPD is heading to every.single.news.outlet in NYC. 1) why in the hell would you report that live on TV for everybody to know and 2) they must have got some scary intel in NYC to do something like send all the police to every news place in the city.
A foreigner can sue for enforcing the law?
Here comes the Acostas and Brian Stelters to talk about their "heroism" in reporting and how brave they are.
This was to distract from the left being called out for their lack of civility and even calls for violence.
It's also rather suspect that this happened in Maryland.
I'll wait to see what comes of this but you already know what the coverage is going to be about forever. Seems whenever the Dems need some press and to distract, it requires a shooting.
They're all on their knees, praying it's a Tump supporter.
Seems odd they are sending units to all newsrooms while at the same time saying the shooting was a local incident and not terrorism. If it was just a local incident then why send units to other newsrooms?
Cops said they can't say for sure if the news outlet was specifically targeted. Said the building houses multiple businesses and the injuries are ranging.
Similar threads
Latest posts
-
Movie/TV Tropes that never happen in real life- Latest: thabigbluenation
-
-
-
-
Could Travis Perry be what many thought Reed would be?
- Latest: PopesReignOverCardinals