Liberal logic
![]()
lol
Owner: Please leave.
SHS: No, serve me.
Owner: Oh, okay. Want these blinds shut?
Liberal logic
![]()
and it was started by Bush. He was just following in his dads footsteps and giving the cartels massive amounts of weapons.Fast n Furious was completely hidden from Congress and done behind their backs. So were the billions funneled to Iran. Americans were murdered as a result from both.
was there some other president that went against congress and used the CIA to funnel weapons and cash to the cartels?
Sure it was. I guess secretly sending billions to Iran was all Bush's fault too.and it was started by Bush. He was just following in his dads footsteps and giving the cartels massive amounts of weapons.
It says in the fine print. Pennsylvania, New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, Florida, Ohio, Virginia, Iowa, Colorado and Texas.Those 905 people. Where do they live?
You guys love the liberal fact checkers don't you?and it was started by Bush. He was just following in his dads footsteps and giving the cartels massive amounts of weapons.
Btw if it really started under the Bush administration Eric Holder never would have allowed himself to be held in contempt and wouldn't be taking the secrets to his grave. He would have spilled his guts and blamed it all on Bush like you're trying to do.and it was started by Bush. He was just following in his dads footsteps and giving the cartels massive amounts of weapons.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli.../gIQAuRHIRL_story.html?utm_term=.e6083d2d93ceYou guys love the liberal fact checkers don't you?
http://www.politifact.com/punditfac...arman-incorrectly-claims-fast-and-furious-gu/
The Justice Department’s Fast and Furious gun-walking program "started in the Bush administration."
— Jane Harman on Sunday, September 28th, 2014 in a panel on "Fox News Sunday"
![]()
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli.../gIQAuRHIRL_story.html?utm_term=.e6083d2d93ce
https://democrats-oversight.house.gov/sites/democrats.oversight.house.gov/files/documents/Fast and Furious.Minority Report.pdf
you can read the report yourself, the ATF was gunwalking in 2006.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli.../gIQAuRHIRL_story.html?utm_term=.e6083d2d93ce
https://democrats-oversight.house.gov/sites/democrats.oversight.house.gov/files/documents/Fast and Furious.Minority Report.pdf
you can read the report yourself, the ATF was gunwalking in 2006.
the ATF gunwalking didn't start with fast & furious. It just got a new name once Holder took it over.Fast and the furious according to those articles was not started by Bush.
Clearly Obama is Hitler, giving guns to cartels and drug runners is against American values.
the ATF gunwalking didn't start with fast & furious. It just got a new name once Holder took it over.
the ATF gunwalking didn't start with fast & furious. It just got a new name once Holder took it over.
Thirties. How about you? Why do you think it's relevant? You obviously had something particular in mind cause you said you were being serious.I'm just curious. How old are you? I'm not baiting, I'm serious.
you can read the report yourself, .
It says in the fine print. Pennsylvania, New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, Florida, Ohio, Virginia, Iowa, Colorado and Texas.
I'm 54. I find more younger people are welcoming of open borders. I believe you said anyone could come in so long as they weren't criminals. What are we going to do with a billion people?Thirties. How about you? Why do you think it's relevant? You obviously had something particular in mind cause you said you were being serious.
I think 325 would be very Reaganesque from 84. Colorado, NM and maybe a smaller state in the NE might flip but the big Lib states won't. I'd love to see it though.If he gets 375 I'll admit i was wong
Doesn't say. I have to say though, having this much of an issue with the methodology just because you don't agree with the results is frightening. You keep moving the goal posts when you get answers you don't like.Where at in those states?
Put them in our crowded cities. Put more stress on our already failing schools. Add to our welfare rolls.I'm 54. I find more younger people are welcoming of open borders. I believe you said anyone could come in so long as they weren't criminals. What are we going to do with a billion people?
Doesn't say. I have to say though, having this much of an issue with the methodology just because you don't agree with the results is frightening. You keep moving the goal posts when you get answers you don't like.
Gallup actually did a worldwide survey/poll on this between 2009 and 2011 and asked people where would they migrate if given the chance. Something like 150 million adults said they would migrate to the US. It's more than likely risen since.What are we going to do with a billion people?
Of course stats work, thats why Hillary is President. What?That's pretty much around the number sampled for most all national polls on anything. Statistics work - or they wouldn't be used.
A billion people aren't going to come here. Immigration has been relatively stable below 800k per year the last 100 years. Just making it easier isn't going to multiply that by number by thousands. Still, we have plenty of room. The midwest and west are mostly empty space.I'm 54. I find more younger people are welcoming of open borders. I believe you said anyone could come in so long as they weren't criminals. What are we going to do with a billion people?
Did they pull everyone on dirt poor countries where there is little opportunity to communicate that way? I doubt the results of most polls.Gallup actually did a worldwide survey/poll on this between 2009 and 2011 and asked people where would they migrate if given the chance. Something like 150 million adults said they would migrate to the US. It's more than likely risen since.
151 countries. https://news.gallup.com/poll/153992/150-million-adults-worldwide-migrate.aspxDid they pull everyone on dirt poor countries where there is little opportunity to communicate that way? I doubt the results of most polls.
As the liberal millennial dipshits here illustrate: feelings>>>>>>cause/effectI'm 54. I find more younger people are welcoming of open borders. I believe you said anyone could come in so long as they weren't criminals. What are we going to do with a billion people?
Wow, you are naive, if our borders were open the world would flood in. So, I assume you want all services available to them, Medicaid, food stamps eitc, student loans and Grant's, welfare, housing allowances, utilities assistance. How will our infrastructure support a significant influx? Our power grid cant, our urban areas are already crowded and most of the land you are talking about is either privately owned or federally protected. Your turn.A billion people aren't going to come here. Immigration has been relatively stable below 800k per year in last 100 years. Just making it easier isn't going to multiply that by number by hundreds. Still, we have plenty of room. The midwest and west are mostly empty space.
I think 325 would be very Reaganesque from 84. Colorado, NM and maybe a smaller state in the NE might flip but the big Lib states won't. I'd love to see it though.
Wow, you are naive, if our borders were open the world would flood in. So, I assume you want all services available to them, Medicaid, food stamps eitc, student loans and Grant's, welfare, housing allowances, utilities assistance. How will our infrastructure support a significant influx? Our power grid cant, our urban areas are already crowded and most of the land you are talking about is either privately owned or federally protected. Your turn.
The midwest and west are mostly empty space.
You have to think Venezuela would see a huge migration since this study.151 countries. https://news.gallup.com/poll/153992/150-million-adults-worldwide-migrate.aspx
Here's how it breaks down.
![]()
the ATF gunwalking didn't start with fast & furious. It just got a new name once Holder took it over.
I agree and either way with open borders and 150 million right off the bat we'd be overrun.You have to think Venezuela would see a huge migration since this study.
A lot of people own a lot of that space. Do we force them to sell and turn every inch of the country into an NYC?
I think 325 would be very Reaganesque from 84. Colorado, NM and maybe a smaller state in the NE might flip but the big Lib states won't. I'd love to see it though.