$50/hr minimum rangeI agree and either way with open borders and 150 million right off the bat we'd be overrun.
Free college
Take the shit out of the rich
Mandatory estrogen for males
Profit
/dion
$50/hr minimum rangeI agree and either way with open borders and 150 million right off the bat we'd be overrun.
.It just got a new name once Holder took it over.
Bernie Sanders should be hanged, worse than every scandalous televangelist in US history put together.
You're the one who's being naive. Our immigration laws aren't that restrictive currently. Way more lax than Canada or the UK as people on here like to point out. Merely reducing the difficulty of immigration wouldn't cause that many more people to come here than already do.Wow, you are naive, if our borders were open the world would flood in. So, I assume you want all services available to them, Medicaid, food stamps eitc, student loans and Grant's, welfare, housing allowances, utilities assistance. How will our infrastructure support a significant influx? Our power grid cant, our urban areas are already crowded and most of the land you are talking about is either privately owned or federally protected. Your turn.
A billion people aren't going to come here. Immigration has been relatively stable below 800k per year the last 100 years. Just making it easier isn't going to multiply that by number by thousands. Still, we have plenty of room. The midwest and west are mostly empty space.
Merely reducing the difficulty of immigration wouldn't cause that many more people to come here than already do.
That's what taxes are for.Owns 3 houses
Owns this
![]()
Made $800K in free money last year
NEVER GAVE ONE PENNY AWAY
You’re literally using legal immigration as a barometer to what open borders would look like.
If you removed all barriers of immigration, and made everyone legal you’d see 10-20 million a year, every year until our economy completely collapsed, then immigration would slow down. Is that what you want, a flood of low skilled workers, you do realize what that would cause, right?
You could kiss the middle class goodbye.
This is 100% true. Wish I had me some Jew blood, but all my genealogical results come up empty. So sad.
Clear you don't understand stats.Of course stats work, thats why Hillary is President. What?
If that's true then why are "open borders" held up as a bogeyman constantly? If only 10% want it then it'll never happen, no need to stress about it.He's in the minority. No one but about 10% feels his way about immigration
Dion is also in the demo that has rapid growing support for Communism despite it killing 100m people last year. They can talk themselves into anything with the right focus on their feelings and virtue.He's in the minority. No one but about 10% feels his way about immigration
You have to think Venezuela would see a huge migration since this study.
Owns 3 houses
Owns this
![]()
Made $800K in free money last year
NEVER GAVE ONE PENNY AWAY
Not with their new higher energy costs engineered by Tom Steyer without voter input. Many M-ganders are POed.Minnesota might flip as well, but Michigan could flip back blue as well.
If that's true then why are "open borders" held up as a bogeyman constantly? If only 10% want it then it'll never happen, no need to stress about it.
That's possible. Again, if true that would mean it never comes anywhere close to becoming policy. The government is currently trying to reduce immigration by ending the diversity lottery and chain migration, not increase it. So why worry about some mythical threat of "open borders" that will never materalize?Umm, 95% is liberal media pushing it down our throats.
It's a very very small echo chamber pushing it.
If only 10% want it then it'll never happen, no need to stress about it.
That's possible. Again, if true that would mean it never comes anywhere close to becoming policy.
Trump actually reversed a "policy" by EO discontinuing separation to appease the fringe 10%. The media still is roasting for upholding democrat immigration policies.
Build that GD Wall
And after Trump agreed to detain the kids with parents Kamala tweeted it wasn't good enough and parents should be released with the kids not the kids detained with the parents. Allowing anyone with a kid to cross the border with no consequences is basically open borders. It also breeds child smuggling/trafficking.
She won't come out and directly say "open borders" because it's damaging politically but advocating to abolish ICE, against border laws and the prosecution of people who break the border laws is the same exact thing. That's why it doesn't matter that it's only 10%. It matters who's in that 10%. Unfortunately she could possibly be a future president.
Well sure. That's obvious to anyone with a functioning brain. But Libs think they are putting one over on us because they think we're so stupid when the stupidity is actually in their mirrors.And after Trump agreed to detain the kids with parents Kamala tweeted it wasn't good enough and parents should be released with the kids not the kids detained with the parents. Allowing anyone with a kid to cross the border with no consequences is basically open borders. It also breeds child smuggling/trafficking.
She won't come out and directly say "open borders" because it's damaging politically but advocating to abolish ICE, against border laws and the prosecution of people who break the border laws is the same exact thing. That's why it doesn't matter that it's only 10%. It matters who's in that 10%. Unfortunately she could possibly be a future president.
Of course. Why are illegals allowed to stay with their kids but arrested & jailed Americans aren't? It defies any attempt at logic other than let anyone in, don't jail anyone. Am I missing something, Libs?And do you understand if they let that happen what will happen next?
Anyone incarcerated for crime "should" be let out due to having a child.
It never stops.
Yet our lax restriction immigration laws are still too much for you, much less Canada's or Mexico's. You're one sick b-tard.You're the one who's being naive. Our immigration laws aren't that restrictive currently. Way more lax than Canada or the UK as people on here like to point out. Merely reducing the difficulty of immigration wouldn't cause that many more people to come here than already do.
Of course. Why are illegals allowed to stay with their kids but arrested & jailed Americans aren't? It defies any attempt at logic other than let anyone in, don't jail anyone. Am I missing something, Libs?
Yet our lax restriction immigration laws are still too much for you, much less Canada's or Mexico's. You're one sick b-tard.
Yet our lax restriction immigration laws are still too much for you, much less Canada's or Mexico's. You're one sick b-tard.
And do you understand if they let that happen what will happen next?
Anyone incarcerated for crime "should" be let out due to having a child.
It never stops.
Democrats’ Border Separation Bill Would Let Nearly All Parents Who Commit Federal Crimes Get Off Scot-Free
Democrats’ proposed legislation to prohibit so-called border separations would actually prevent federal law enforcement agencies almost anywhere inside the United States from arresting and detaining criminals who are parents having nothing to do with unlawfully crossing the border and seeking asylum.
Every Senate Democrat has now signed on to cosponsor a bill written so carelessly that it does not distinguish between migrant children at the border and U.S. citizen children already within the United States. The bill further does not distinguish between federal officers handling the border crisis and federal law enforcement pursuing the ordinary course of their duties.
Democrats’ Border Separation Bill Would Let Nearly All Parents Who Commit Federal Crimes Get Off Scot-Free
Democrats’ proposed legislation to prohibit so-called border separations would actually prevent federal law enforcement agencies almost anywhere inside the United States from arresting and detaining criminals who are parents having nothing to do with unlawfully crossing the border and seeking asylum.
Every Senate Democrat has now signed on to cosponsor a bill written so carelessly that it does not distinguish between migrant children at the border and U.S. citizen children already within the United States. The bill further does not distinguish between federal officers handling the border crisis and federal law enforcement pursuing the ordinary course of their duties.
You're blind, now respond to my questions to you.You're the one who's being naive. Our immigration laws aren't that restrictive currently. Way more lax than Canada or the UK as people on here like to point out. Merely reducing the difficulty of immigration wouldn't cause that many more people to come here than already do.
You’re literally using legal immigration as a barometer to what open borders would look like.
If you removed all barriers of immigration, and made everyone legal you’d see 10-20 million a year, every year until our economy completely collapsed, then immigration would slow down. Is that what you want, a flood of low skilled workers, you do realize what that would cause, right?
You could kiss the middle class goodbye.