I bet you're the kind of guy that blows his wad in 30 seconds and wonders why the girl hasn't gotten off yet. Assuming you're into women and one would have you.
POLITICAL THREAD
- Thread starter kybobcat
- Start date
Libs will swear up and down they don't hate America but if you argue with one for more than 15 minutes it becomes obvious they do. Their last president literally ran on the slogan, hope and CHANGE. They want to change everything this country was based upon.
If you haven't seen this, you should. This common man can SPEAK!
Private Citizen Mark Johnson addresses the Greensboro City Council on their plan to ban gun show use of the city owned Coliseum. A fine witness for gun rights supporters!
Private Citizen Mark Johnson addresses the Greensboro City Council on their plan to ban gun show use of the city owned Coliseum. A fine witness for gun rights supporters!
Mitt Romney should have been president in 2012. He was a better candidate of the 2. And he wasnt even a real conservative, he was a true centrist. He had better economic policy, better foreign policy (he warned about Russia, which all libs are now all of a sudden so concerned about), and there was no dirt on him. Yet, dems do what dems do and started with their hateful propaganda rhetoric. That and the media behavior towards him then put all the pieces in place that got the ball rolling for Trump to become president.
Obummer wanted to “fundamentally change America “. Wtf?
Wonder how much longer til Mueller charges someone to try to take this out of the news. Maybe he can charge Manafort a 10th time.
If you think Obama did not have it easy, I know what to tell you. Your dumber than a box of rocks.
It depends on the day, he/she identifies as a woman most days.
Although I do wish the Rs would have done a hell of a lot more to stop Obama. Every one of his bullshit EOs, and especially his unilateral unconstitutional changes to Obamacare to push off some of the negative consequences past election time, should have been challenged in court.
His changes to Obamacare were blatantly unconstitutional and done for the sole purpose of trying to delay all the harm everyone knew was coming until after they were suckered into voting D again.
His changes to Obamacare were blatantly unconstitutional and done for the sole purpose of trying to delay all the harm everyone knew was coming until after they were suckered into voting D again.
At the end of the day, thankfully, he did 99% of his governing through EO as opposed to trying to get legislative support, so Trump was easily able to erase his entire legacy.
State the years when a NK leader met with a US President. 2018.
So a Trump voter asked me today to explain net neutrality and what does it mean in regards to its abolishment by the GOP congress. I said, "Well basically it's like the GOP congress just gave the interstate to a bunch of private road contractors. The public roads are now private driveways for those corporations."
Someone asked you why the GOP Congress abolished net neutrality, and you didn't explain to him Congress didn't abolish net neutrality?
Bet this guy ^ was totally fine with sending Iran pallets of cash though.
Liberalism is a mental disorder...thusly, no conservative would ever ask a liberal to explain anything...ever, although the liberal demands that everyone listen to them and shut the hell up. Liberals are irrelevant, stupid and corrupt...always. Just stating facts.
I am afraid some did like for example John McCain and Lindsey Graham. McCain would get mad if someone called Obama by his full name.
McCain loved Obama. It was really weird.
This board is full of morons or Russian bots, for example how can any conclusion be made about two serial liars coming to an agreement in private with no means of verification? I mean hell even Reagan said "trust but verify." People here are rejoicing over a photo op of two completely untrustworthy liars.
So Ben Smith of Buzzfeed asked twitter-world what questions he should ask Ben Rhodes in an upcoming interview. Hilarity ensues. Saw a link to the infamous NYT profile from May 2016. Just skimmed it again. The arrogance of Rhodes and the rest of the Obama crowd, and the simply ugly way they view others is astonishing. Political views aside, their comeupance was long overdue by November 2016. Anyway, this part is amazing. As they say about the media guys, just assume they are democrat operatives with bylines, and everything makes sense....:
"The job he was hired to do, namely to help the president of the United States communicate with the public, was changing in equally significant ways, thanks to the impact of digital technologies that people in Washington were just beginning to wrap their minds around. It is hard for many to absorb the true magnitude of the change in the news business — 40 percent of newspaper-industry professionals have lost their jobs over the past decade — in part because readers can absorb all the news they want from social-media platforms like Facebook, which are valued in the tens and hundreds of billions of dollars and pay nothing for the “content” they provide to their readers. You have to have skin in the game — to be in the news business, or depend in a life-or-death way on its products — to understand the radical and qualitative ways in which words that appear in familiar typefaces have changed. Rhodes singled out a key example to me one day, laced with the brutal contempt that is a hallmark of his private utterances. “All these newspapers used to have foreign bureaus,” he said. “Now they don’t. They call us to explain to them what’s happening in Moscow and Cairo. Most of the outlets are reporting on world events from Washington. The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old, and their only reporting experience consists of being around political campaigns. That’s a sea change. They literally know nothing.”
In this environment, Rhodes has become adept at ventriloquizing many people at once. Ned Price, Rhodes’s assistant, gave me a primer on how it’s done. The easiest way for the White House to shape the news, he explained, is from the briefing podiums, each of which has its own dedicated press corps. “But then there are sort of these force multipliers,” he said, adding, “We have our compadres, I will reach out to a couple people, and you know I wouldn’t want to name them — ”
“I can name them,” I said, ticking off a few names of prominent Washington reporters and columnists who often tweet in sync with White House messaging.
Price laughed. “I’ll say, ‘Hey, look, some people are spinning this narrative that this is a sign of American weakness,’” he continued, “but —”
“In fact it’s a sign of strength!” I said, chuckling.
“And I’ll give them some color,” Price continued, “and the next thing I know, lots of these guys are in the dot-com publishing space, and have huge Twitter followings, and they’ll be putting this message out on their own.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/08/...st-who-became-obamas-foreign-policy-guru.html
"The job he was hired to do, namely to help the president of the United States communicate with the public, was changing in equally significant ways, thanks to the impact of digital technologies that people in Washington were just beginning to wrap their minds around. It is hard for many to absorb the true magnitude of the change in the news business — 40 percent of newspaper-industry professionals have lost their jobs over the past decade — in part because readers can absorb all the news they want from social-media platforms like Facebook, which are valued in the tens and hundreds of billions of dollars and pay nothing for the “content” they provide to their readers. You have to have skin in the game — to be in the news business, or depend in a life-or-death way on its products — to understand the radical and qualitative ways in which words that appear in familiar typefaces have changed. Rhodes singled out a key example to me one day, laced with the brutal contempt that is a hallmark of his private utterances. “All these newspapers used to have foreign bureaus,” he said. “Now they don’t. They call us to explain to them what’s happening in Moscow and Cairo. Most of the outlets are reporting on world events from Washington. The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old, and their only reporting experience consists of being around political campaigns. That’s a sea change. They literally know nothing.”
In this environment, Rhodes has become adept at ventriloquizing many people at once. Ned Price, Rhodes’s assistant, gave me a primer on how it’s done. The easiest way for the White House to shape the news, he explained, is from the briefing podiums, each of which has its own dedicated press corps. “But then there are sort of these force multipliers,” he said, adding, “We have our compadres, I will reach out to a couple people, and you know I wouldn’t want to name them — ”
“I can name them,” I said, ticking off a few names of prominent Washington reporters and columnists who often tweet in sync with White House messaging.
Price laughed. “I’ll say, ‘Hey, look, some people are spinning this narrative that this is a sign of American weakness,’” he continued, “but —”
“In fact it’s a sign of strength!” I said, chuckling.
“And I’ll give them some color,” Price continued, “and the next thing I know, lots of these guys are in the dot-com publishing space, and have huge Twitter followings, and they’ll be putting this message out on their own.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/08/...st-who-became-obamas-foreign-policy-guru.html
What year was it determined by our military that their missile tech had evolved to where they could reach anywhere in the US?
You're entitled to that opinion. We'll just have to agree to disagree on that part.
Similar threads
