POLITICAL THREAD
- Thread starter kybobcat
- Start date
If you’re concerned with governmental overreach and authoritarianism like you profess to be, why would you think it’s a good idea for the government to be able to legally kill its citizens?
I own 11 and will buy more because I like guns. Have not killed anyone here yet, don't really know how many in the middle east. My bullets there weighed 208 pounds each and had a max range of about 29 miles so, could not see who it hit.
1998 New York Times
The Adultery Wars
"Publicly humiliating anyone for consensual adultery is draconian, and wrong."
The Adultery Wars
"Publicly humiliating anyone for consensual adultery is draconian, and wrong."
A holocaust survivor being killed, man that is just terrible.
Good lord, You just proved my point and don’t even realize it.
You assume they automatically can’t lift themselves out of need by themselves, that they need saving.
When you make someone dependent on the Govt to survive, you are in essence taking away their freedom. Anytime they need to be controlled a simple threat to that assistance quickly wheels them back in line.
You give a man a fish, he eats for a day. You teach a man to fish and he eats for a lifetime.
Just saw the pulse nightclub shooters father was a paid fbi informant for 11 years and they were likely aware both he and his son were dangerous.
Not surprising. Another mass shooting easily preventable. Explains why noone did anything despite multiple complaints
Not surprising. Another mass shooting easily preventable. Explains why noone did anything despite multiple complaints
He wants excellent people to work for him? My god, this ought to be the time that takes Drumpf down for sure.
You’re the one assuming that people who use government programs are “dependent” on the government and incapable. 30% of Medicaid and food stamps recipients are off the programs WITHIN A YEAR and a majority(56%) are off within 3. These programs exist to help people in adverse circumstances, not make them dependent on the government.
Most of us aren't fluent in Obama talk either.
So like the FBI....what do you do here exactly?
But Stormy Daniels tho.
(link contains video of interview)
http://thehill.com/video/in-the-new...ays-fbi-sought-new-information-from-him-about
Russian uranium informant says FBI sought new info from him about the Clintons
In his first on-camera interview, William Douglas Campbell told The Hill he was interviewed for about five hours in December by FBI agents from Little Rock, Ark., who were investigating whether donations to the Clintons’s charitable empire were used to influence U.S. nuclear policy during the Obama years.
Campbell said he was asked specifically about whether donations to the Clintons charitable efforts were used to influence U.S. nuclear policy during the Obama year, and that agents questioned him extensively about claims the Russians made to him that they had routed millions of dollars to an American lobbying firm in 2010 and 2011 with the expectation it would be used to help President Clinton's charitable global initiative while major uranium decisions were pending before Hillary Clinton's State Department.
"They were looking into the Clintons, and the information that I provided to them about the Clintons and about what was said and confirmed by Russian leadership seemed to be very important to them,” Campbell said, appearing in shadow during the interview to protect his identity.
(link contains video of interview)
http://thehill.com/video/in-the-new...ays-fbi-sought-new-information-from-him-about
Russian uranium informant says FBI sought new info from him about the Clintons
In his first on-camera interview, William Douglas Campbell told The Hill he was interviewed for about five hours in December by FBI agents from Little Rock, Ark., who were investigating whether donations to the Clintons’s charitable empire were used to influence U.S. nuclear policy during the Obama years.
Campbell said he was asked specifically about whether donations to the Clintons charitable efforts were used to influence U.S. nuclear policy during the Obama year, and that agents questioned him extensively about claims the Russians made to him that they had routed millions of dollars to an American lobbying firm in 2010 and 2011 with the expectation it would be used to help President Clinton's charitable global initiative while major uranium decisions were pending before Hillary Clinton's State Department.
"They were looking into the Clintons, and the information that I provided to them about the Clintons and about what was said and confirmed by Russian leadership seemed to be very important to them,” Campbell said, appearing in shadow during the interview to protect his identity.
So Obama did not agree to a strike on an American citizen? Did he agree to forcing people to buy things they did not want? Is ignorance a thing you rely on when posting?
I definitely don’t think killing an American citizen in a drone strike was a good idea. Do you? Cause I was saying I don’t think it’s a good idea for the government to kill its citizens. That was the whole point, though I shouldn’t expect different from someone who’s shown a dearth of reading comprehension.
Which is solved by getting government out of the way so the free market can provide opportunity as opposed to the govt putting ceilings on ppl
Reading comprehension? Who questioned who's post? It was really quite clear but, you seemed to miss the point whether by total ignorance or just being too dumb to get the inference. Warrior-cat 1, assorted assholes, nothing.
A
anon_l8pbkn96tg3j6
Guest
honestly wtf . . . this seems like a legit bombshell, but cnn.com is indistinguishable from pornhub. I feel like I need to reread 1984.
Address my point you arrogant prick. If you’re so against the government killing its citizens why do you support the death penalty?
One was summarily murdered without due process.
The others get loads of due process through hearings, etc.
Pretty easy really.
Before I answer that, are you pro life?
Edited: By the way, your response had me laughing. I usually do that when I know I have my enemy beat.
How is the government keeping people from accessing free market opportunity? No government official is going to step out of the shadows and stop me from applying to McDonalds. But McDonalds is definitely not going to pay me enough to live on.
I’m pro the government not telling its citizens what they can and can’t do with their own bodies. That includes abortion, suicide, and substances.
So it’s a good thing when the government murders people with due process, just not without. Can’t wait to make some new laws to make it legal to murder people in this thread.
So killing innocent babies is OK but, allowing hardened criminals who have committed unspeakable atrocities to live is OK. Are you pro gun including whatever weapon I want to buy and have?
You are a snowflake, be careful what you wish for, I would literally beat you to the punch and therefore to a pulp.
Lots of intricacies on that point for people to disagree on. I tend to think the line is when the fetus can survive outside the womb on its own with no assistance of any kind, but there are many opinions.
