Why would they do that and threaten the narrative? rhetorical question
There are a few cases that are western right wingers. Best to lump together for narrative.
Why would they do that and threaten the narrative? rhetorical question
Theres been a rumor ever since Kelly was hired that he wants to stop Trumps tweeting. Not sure where it came from. I guess it could've been true, but obviously Trump will do whatever he wants. I really doubt its true though. If Kelly thought he could stop Trump from tweeting, he probably wouldn't have taken the job. No way Trump would've agreed to it.I casually read Zero Hedge/Durden, and enjoy it most times, but he's way off trying to blame Kelly, claiming he lost control. Kelly was brought in because Reince was useless and to put a stop to the leakss, not be Trump's social media filter. I don't have a clue where he even got that idea. It's a completely made up assertion.
I dropped everything and read that. I'm glad I did as it's one of the most articulate and accurate things I've ever read.
I wasn't able to quote any of it, but there are several paragraphs that stood out to me. The ones on crime and reparations were especially pointed. If @jameslee32 , @fuzz77 , or @keysersosay#1 would care to read it and tell us what they disagree with, I'll be happy to explain to them why they are mistaken.
"When people give up the seductive idea that the world owes them something, except the right to be left alone, they are given the power of forgiveness—even of those who have historically oppressed them."
Thanks for posting this. Other than checking this thread once or twice a month I'm not big on politics or social issues and have never heard of Mr. Peterson. I am now a fan. Maybe I'm just that ignorant on the subjects being discussed but this right here took me for a ride. It should come with a disclaimer. Really. Strap in and hold on.
https://m.youtube.com/user/JordanPetersonVideosThanks for posting this. Other than checking this thread once or twice a month I'm not big on politics or social issues and have never heard of Mr. Peterson. I am now a fan. Maybe I'm just that ignorant on the subjects being discussed but this right here took me for a ride. It should come with a disclaimer. Really. Strap in and hold on.
She'll be doing parties at Minardi before it's all over.
She'll be doing parties at Minardi before it's all over.
One of those white girls who 'squirts to the ceiling'.
Huh? There's video.Not happening.
Didn't the NYT have a front page many eons ago that said "GOD IS DEAD"?
It gets worse. The majority who actually went to see it thought it sucked.
If we ever go to a one party system, America no longer exist. It will not be a party, it will be a dictatorship. I will like many others, choose to fight another civil war.
Didn't the NYT have a front page many eons ago that said "GOD IS DEAD"?
That's the college's stance and now, by making that agreement, it's the teachers' stance. Not a good look.A bunch of b.s., if you ask me. That professor also comes off as a sellout, looking for a quick payday. He should have saw it through; or, at least made them admit guilt. Instead, he let the University and the racist degenerates off the hook. Every single word in bold is a lie. We all saw it go down in real time.
Bret Weinstein and his wife, Heather Heying, resigned from their faculty positions effective Friday. The couple filed a $3.85 million tort claim in July alleging the college failed to “protect its employees from repeated provocative and corrosive verbal and written hostility based on race, as well as threats of physical violence,” according to the claim.
In an email to faculty and staff sent Friday about 6:40 p.m., Evergreen officials wrote that the college will pay $450,000 to the couple and $50,000 toward the couple’s attorney fees.
“In making this agreement, the college admits no liability, and rejects the allegations made in the tort claim. The educational activities of Day of Absence/Day of Presence were not discriminatory. The college took reasonable and appropriate steps to engage with protesters during spring quarter, de-escalate conflict, and keep the campus safe,” according to the email.
Liberals literally boo'd God at their convention in 2012.I like the left talking about "God" and character and values.
But it always pisses me off when the left claims Trump talks about sexual assault. They ignore the word "Let's." Let's you. As in us guys in HS talking about girls letting us feel boobs or diddle them. Haha.
But moving on, I never voted for Trump to be a preacher. I wanted someone who was strong and ultimately, would leave Christians alone, protect us from Islam, give us the Supreme Court and fight off the Clinton machine.
What are Christians supposed to do? Vote for the party who hates them and targets them? The party who believes in late-term abortion and wants to financially ruin a Christian baker? The party who enables Islamic persecution of Christians?
That's exactly my point. To me, it comes off like he was only suing for the money, not the principle of the matter; otherwise, he would have at least wanted an admission of guilt, an apology, something, as part of the low ball settlement.That's the college's stance and now, by making that agreement, it's the teachers' stance. Not a good look.
Explains why Trump has been on Twitter these past few days railing about it not being strict enough.
I think it was Prebius who said 3-4 months ago that Trump wants a bigger travel ban. They've probably have had it in the works for a while now.Explains why Trump has been on Twitter these past few days railing about it not being strict enough.
I wouldn't give up my right to vote, but i would let someone anal rape me with a baseball bat just to knock off $5k