ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%
  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
Story would have been a little more inspirational if she didn't have to take on any debt to get through school.


I'm going to write into Business Insider and tell them my inspirational tale of my parents paying for college. Should really make everyone with student loans know, they too one day can be debt free.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FusterCluck
that's backwards and you know it.

That's the absolute opposite of what Dems want. Dems want big government and to use government to mandate their ideology. They want to force you to submit to them.

These same dickheads use the government to ruin businesses if they don't want to bake a cake. They want to control every aspect of your life and Dems always push for this. Government is always the solution to them.

You can tell this kid is brainwashed and never surrounded by anyone who can correct him and challenge him. Just amazing that someone could have his take on Dem beliefs.
 
To follow up on my above post, Dems expect government to solve all of their problems and mistakes. Effed up in life? Not your fault, right, Dems? Let's get government to save you and steal from others.

Not qualified for a job? Let's force them to lower the standards and hire you based on race. I mean, you fools love the idea of socialism. That's wanting less government? Ha
 
  • Like
Reactions: IdaCat
You know exactly what democrats believe in. Power of choice, free will without government intervention.
The trolling continues. No one can be this ignorant. If you believe in choice and free will without government intervention, then how can you support any government program that takes money from one individual and gives it to another, or do you only support choice for a select few? Social Security is forced savings (government intervention), welfare is forced income redistribution, medicaid is forced income redistribution, the ACA is forced income redistribution, food stamps is forced income redistribution, etc. Your party is far more responsible for removing choice and violating individual rights than the Republicans ever thought about being.
 
Last edited:
You know exactly what democrats believe in. Power of choice, free will without government intervention.

Ricky, I have to give you credit. As a troll you've done an excellent job of demonstrating the type of illogical, irresponsible, misguided thinking that is typical of liberal thought. How appropriate using the pseudo-persona of a 17 year-old as that is generally the level of thought, if not intelligence of your typical lib.
Nice work!
 
Last edited:
You're either an idiot or a troll
latest
 
The trolling continues. No one can be this ignorant. If you believe in choice and free will without government intervention, then how can you support any government program that takes money from one individual and gives it to another, or do you only support choice for a select few? Social Security is forced savings (government intervention, welfare is forced income redistribution, medicaid is forced income redistribution, the ACA is forced income redistribution, food stamps is forced income redistribution, etc. Your party is far more responsible for removing choice and violating individual rights than the Republicans ever thought about being.
When I said moral issues, I meant moral. Not fiscal.
 
I want an answer to these ?'s.

Can someone tell me why Putin would not have prefered Hillary Clinton over Donald Trump?

What would Hillary have done to Russia?

TIA.
 
I want an answer to these ?'s.

Can someone tell me why Putin would not have prefered Hillary Clinton over Donald Trump?

What would Hillary have done to Russia?

TIA.

She wanted her Syrian pipeline. No fly zone would have led to WWIII with Russia. She would have made sure Isis didn't fail at the Assad overthrow. Iran was next on the list.
 
  • Like
Reactions: screwduke1
Face it, I give you guys purpose on this board. Sad! This is just as much fun for you as it is for me.
no but it's fun to debate politics and explain why liberalism is so toxic to mankind. When I type my responses out it helps me understand as much as I am explaining. so Thank you. I know you believe the things you do. You're not trolling.
 
no but it's fun to debate politics and explain why liberalism is so toxic to mankind. When I type my responses out it helps me understand as much as I am explaining. so Thank you. I know you believe the things you do. You're not trolling.
I'm trolling by coming on here for no other reason than to piss you off. But what I say is basically my amped up opinions.
 
I'm trolling by coming on here for no other reason than to piss you off. But what I say is basically my amped up opinions.
that's why there is a specific politics board. Everybody gets pissed off at everybody. I just come here cuz im bored at work and HAVE to be here. And I'm on here when I'm at the bar after work ha. But if this is what's fun for you right on. I love the paddock and I love this board.
 
I'm trolling by coming on here for no other reason than to piss you off. But what I say is basically my amped up opinions.
I really don't think you are pissing anyone off. You make statements and don't, or can't, support anything you say. There is rarely any fundamental logic or argument coupled with the statements you make. It's just a statement. It doesn't piss people off. It just makes you look like someone who has fallen for liberal propaganda without having any real knowledge of anything you are talking about. If your purpose is to make yourself look bad, then you have accomplished that very well, but I doubt very seriously if anyone takes you seriously enough to be pissed off.
 
I want an answer to these ?'s.

Can someone tell me why Putin would not have prefered Hillary Clinton over Donald Trump?

What would Hillary have done to Russia?

TIA.

He WOULD have preferred hillury. That's why he's planted these ideas of collaboration in the minds of dems and their media lapdogs. All this Trump/Rooskie collaboration talk was started by Putin to discredit Trump. Yes...putin wanted to impact the election. He wanted hillury to be elected. Looks like it backfired. Look for Putin to continue feeding gullible dems and media buffoons false Trump fodder. He wants to sidetrack Trump's agenda. Putin is scared.
 
  • Like
Reactions: screwduke1
He WOULD have preferred hillury. That's why he's planted these ideas of collaboration in the minds of dems and their media lapdogs. All this Trump/Rooskie collaboration talk was started by Putin to discredit Trump. Yes...putin wanted to impact the election. He wanted hillury to be elected. Looks like it backfired. Look for Putin to continue feeding gullible dems and media buffoons false Trump fodder. He wants to sidetrack Trump's agenda. Putin is scared.
Very good points IMO. I think Putin and the dems are collaborating to try to take Trump down, but they want to portray it as the other way. Its not as crazy as it sounds, Ted Kennedy tried to do it to Reagan.

Trump will be much firmer on Russia than Hillary. Not that Trump will end up lobbing nukes at Russia or anything, but Hillary would've let them do whatever they want. She would've doubled down on Obamas flexible policy with them.

And its not just Russia, either. She would have let any and every country go over us. Trump won't allow it anymore. America hating countries would've been thrilled with another 4-8 years of the last 8 years.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT