POLITICAL THREAD
- Thread starter kybobcat
- Start date
Trump is fearless, but to be honest it's good strategy to accept an invitation to a lot of things like this.
He has to get his message out, especially about her and her record. The media is trying to scrub everything that exists about her positions in 2020 and currently, etc.
That is one reason he was willing to do that CNN debate against Biden even though Biden's team wrote the conditions. Kamala is going to mostly hide like Biden in 2020. Never face a series of difficult questions, if she ever does get an uncomfortable question she will have been given it in advance and her team will have time to form an answer. The only way for Trump and Vance to counter a whole media that is against them is to show up, and be ready for the fight.
I do agree with @OHIO COLONEL though that Trump might be better off doing rallies in black communities and saying it directly to the people.
Last edited:
Trump is the only one who has the balls to face the hostile press, or the electorate, head on. Always has.
Biden hid in a basement during his campaign, never did a single event that wasn’t heavily scripted, and now Harris hasn’t had a single press conference and is doing everything possible to memory-hole her past statements.
And our resident liberal nitwits think that it’s Trump that came off looking bad out of all of that.
Biden hid in a basement during his campaign, never did a single event that wasn’t heavily scripted, and now Harris hasn’t had a single press conference and is doing everything possible to memory-hole her past statements.
And our resident liberal nitwits think that it’s Trump that came off looking bad out of all of that.
Plenty of room on the Harris train if one isn't able to drill down on the issues and make the smart choice. I think they even have some "dudes for Camalla" society. lmao
She's absolutely doing her version of a basement campaign. They can't run on policy so they hide and cheat and hope the other candidate says something that will sway the votes of the weak-minded that get their feeliings hurt instead of doing the common sense thing and focusing on the policies.
Last edited:
Notice how rupar cut this off right before Trump says he's not talking immunity from prosecution, but from lawsuits.
Yet, Village Idiot will be here parroting it as gospel nonetheless in less that 48 hours.
Trump is not a right winger. Far better than the alternative.
Kushner needs to be nowhere near the White House policy.
When Trump goes back to Butler for a rally he should look at buying network time (all majors if possible) to air it. Keep the speech down to 45-50 minutes and give Vance 10-15.
Or, is that even possible in this day and time? Can (and will) networks say no? RSBN, NewsMax, etc are just preaching to the choir.
Or, is that even possible in this day and time? Can (and will) networks say no? RSBN, NewsMax, etc are just preaching to the choir.
Trumps money would be better spent getting air time for Kamala. Let them see how stupid she really is. On second thought, she will hide.
Trump is conservative on many things, but his social policy stances are not right wing. There aren't a lot of right-wingers having Kim Kardashian over to celebrate prison reform.
What do you mean? Of course it's both. White privilege is not a magic weapon. I don't get to walk into the DMV and hold my face up to a color chart to skip the line. It's just the general preference a society has for the majority who look like them. In China they have Han privilege. Money(economic factors) nearly always trumps these other social issues, look at OJ. "I'm not Black, I'm OJ."
I specifically referenced your ditch weed, you'll get there. Sadly some of it was still around even in my day. You could always tell because certain pieces had flat sides where it was vacuum packed in those bricks lol.
Uh yeah, I've done it. It doesn't increase the THC %, that's all in the grow.
Last edited:
They didn't hear the case, genius. Since your microcephalic cranium seems to think courts are unerring arbiters of truth, you must think OJ is innocent, and the Roe vs wade, Presidential immunity rulings by the SC are not to be questioned.
If you leftists had any consistency in your reasoning, you might actually be dangerous.
I have no idea why trump did that interview. He doesn't have to say yes to everything. This was an obvious set up he should've avoided.
Well, show me someone in Congress who doesn't oppose any changes? Any mention of cutting benefits or making significant (and needed, in my opinion) changes to the current SS system is political suicide. No one will touch that with a 100' pole.
'Changes', especially if DJT says it, will be disseminated across the media as 'ending SS as we know it', regardless of what he actually says. 'No more SS for Grandma!!!'. The Dims, on the other hand, want to give everyone a 'basic income' so 'SS for everyone!'. Well, the SS system is busted and will be flat broke in about 6 years. What could possibly go wrong by making sure everyone is dipping into that dried up well? Oh, let's not forget those folks who've crossed the border illegally and have not paid one bloody cent into the system. By all means, let's give them some cash, too.
The first step to making changes that will ensure the sustainability of the SS program is to realize that the current system cannot be fixed. Keeping some important pieces and making sure those most in need and receiving current benefits don't take the brunt would be job 1. After that, funding, privatization, COLA, income that is taxed, means testing, etc. all need to be on the table or the whole thing will implode. Same with Medicare, another program teetering on the edge of collapse and expected to collapse within the next 5-7 years. Running up >$1T in annual deficits with 10's of $T of unfunded obligations (pensions, SS, Medicare/caid) is lunacy. Nobody on either side of the aisle cares just so long as they can line their own pockets. Certainly neither of the frontrunners for President are going to cut spending or even propose cutting spending. The only thing I can say is that Trump will overspend less insanely than the Cackling idiot.
Sambo must’ve come across that article yesterday.
I disagree. The weed in the late 60s and early 70s you could sit with a group of people and smoke joints for
Trump declares seniors should not pay taxes on Social Security
Trump declares seniors should not pay taxes on Social Security
Republican presidential nominee and former President Trump said in a social media post on Wednesday that he wants to make Social Security tax-free for senior citizens.
I truly believe Jack Nicholson was playing himself in the shining
Trump should also take questions, then.
I don't really care if she's Indian, black or whatever. She is a card-carrying socialist IMO. Robin Hood government, reparations, all of it. I'm too old to have what little I have, taxed and redistributed to others.
I am crossing the Rubicon and backing the Republican Party and President Trump.Many — including a former version of myself — get trapped in a mental framework that becomes their identity and prevents them from radically evolving their thinking with new facts and information. I finally broke free from it.
...
"I was shocked to learn that, for the most part, Republicans cared more deeply about their constituents, while Democrats, in my experience, cared more about government power and control."
...
"I was shocked to learn that, for the most part, Republicans cared more deeply about their constituents, while Democrats, in my experience, cared more about government power and control."
Not taxing SS benefits is not a change to the actual SS system. Doesn't affect the sustainability of the program one iota. It's still going bankrupt very soon regardless of whether the benefits are eventually taxed to the recipients (and I'm OK with not taxing or at least raising the income levels to 2024 levels before taxation of benefits begins). But, that doesn't solve the basic problem.I disagree. The weed in the late 60s and early 70s you could sit with a group of people and smoke joints for
Trump declares seniors should not pay taxes on Social Security
Trump declares seniors should not pay taxes on Social Security
Republican presidential nominee and former President Trump said in a social media post on Wednesday that he wants to make Social Security tax-free for senior citizens.www.foxbusiness.com
Yah nothing says “obvious set up” like Harris Faulkner from Fox News.
Saying it or spraying it?
If that is all you have, then whatever. Trump isn't far right, but he is a helluva lot father across the midpoint than people believe.
Longer hair with a good hair stylist, more covering makeup, and thick beer goggles would go a long way to help a third-tier male to take a shot.
Your party literally just strong-armed your incumbent out because you couldn't hide his track record and dementia anymore.
Only to replace him with a pant suited homewrecking buffoon.
"Trump weird! Squawk! Orange man bad! Squawk!"
Pull the Democrat pull strings and watch him bleat out the talking points!
For ages 6-80. Batteries sold separately.
Don’t mind him doing the interviews despite the obvious slander attempts but he has to be able to handle himself better than the few things I saw today. Has to know he will be attacked but he can respond respectfully to their “questions and accusations” without getting personal himself. Kill them with kindness!!! When he gets vile that is what they expect and what they want.
The long (maybe short) term state of the economy is frightening. I often wonder how many in D.C. even think about it. There is NO way we can continue going the way we are. As you pointed out...SS going broke, Medicare going broke, debt out of control, etc.
What was the debt when Obama took office? 5...10T? He doubled it. Trump with covid added trillions, Biden with big gov't Dem/lib spending put it in overdrive. Now it goes up by a T every month or so. No way this country can continue without it all imploding.
Have you listened to word salad Kamala?
Kushner did a good job with the Abraham Accords. He was one of the primary folks behind that initiative. What specific policy initiatives didn't you like, The First Step Act?
I definitely agree with this. Early on, unless you had hash or Thai sticks, you had to hit most weed pretty hard to get there. Quality of a lot now is one-toke, clean with a nice parachute glide down. This is what my friends tell me, although many my age are doing edibles.
Similar threads
