You say let’s “vote for people who campaign on expanding freedoms and protections,” yet you turn around and vote for people who want to take away our freedoms, who want to control our speech and use the federal law enforcement agencies to do just that. You vote for people who want to trample on our 2A rights to protect our homes and families and to protect ourselves from a tyrannical government. You vote for people who want to turn our sovereignty over to the WEF. You vote for people who align themselves with those who want to restrict our freedom to travel, how much we eat and what we eat, what we drive,So we vote for politicians who campaign on expanding freedoms and protections for people, not curtail them. The root of the problem isn't the politicians though, they're just a reflection of the society they're in. The problem is who pays them and the press, which was the initial topic, alike. Our system was designed as a representative democracy where the elected representatives represent the interests of their constituents. Not whoever pays them the most. Do you really think the majority of Kentuckians would vote Mitch McConnell into office repeatedly if elections were really open and fair and well-regulated? No, he maintains his position through power. Power he gets from money. Which means no realistic primary challenger that more aligns with Kentuckians' positions. Which means no real campaigns, no even real serious conversations about issues that voters care about. It's similar in the Democratic party establishment. What we need to tackle is campaign finance reform and lobbying. Actually drain the swamp in a bipartisan, legal, lasting way. Not more 'freedoms' for corporations and the rich to legally bribe our elected representatives.
Don’t give us that kind of drivel then do the exact opposite.