I would like to clarify that
@phunterd was correct when we he said this earlier:
We were conflating lots of cases at the time and Kim Davis was being referenced when talking about the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and
Bostock v. Clayton County expanding sex discrimination to include sexual orientation and gender identity, but this specific case is over CO law like he said. Specifically the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act, or CADA, that specifically mentions sexual orientation and transgender.
I say this because
@Caveman Catfan brings up a good point about the constitutionality of CADA already being on SCOTUS's docket with
303 Creative LLC v. Elenis. But you have to be precise when discussing these things because what he failed to mention is that SCOTUS took up
303 Creative LLC v. Elenis on the free speech clause of the First Amendment and specifically refused to take up the free exercise of religion clause which was also being contended.