ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%
  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
Actually a nugget of truth to this. Neither the Proud Boys nor Antifa tend to be particularly attractive. Probably because they’re made up of societally disaffected people who have a much tougher go of it than their attractive peers. Katy Perry and Taylor Swift don’t have to be competent in their field(vocals). Because they look like that.
Dion says white males are the societally disaffected people and that there is a systemic racism that favors white males. The times in which we live.

Think about all of the Antifa and Proud Boy singers who cannot get a break because they don’t look like Katie Perry!! We suck.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mdlUK.1
I think it would be very, very hard to live in a lot of minority neighborhoods, experience and live with those minority folks, see life from their perspective, see how the world is full of good decent people regardless of race, and be a Republican. I just don't think it would be common. Experience changes you and makes you empathetic, I believe.
It would be hard to remain a Dem. Seeing how that political party uses people’s race to divide and how Dem policies have maintained the status quo in poor communities. I think you would have to become a Republican just to have peace of mind and hope for the future.
 
7de607fa1637d744.png
 


Get ready for the government to swoop in and save us with getting rid of all of these unregulated digital coins. “We will provide you with the digital CBDC so we will have total control over you!”

Ever heard of the Hegelian Dialectic? You better be researching it….problem-reaction-solution. We will be begging (reaction) for their solution from the problem they created.
 
  • Like
Reactions: warrior-cat
Time to dust this subject matter off……

The dumb "pedo" attacks are wasted bandwidth as no sane voter is going to believe that Qanon crap. What is the point of investing so much work in such a lousy unbelievable loony story? That's why you guys keep losing as you only play the tune your nutcase wing already knows the words to.

Also, that pic has one of my greatest icons in it of my life. I looked up to Anthony Bourdain as an example of a man that knew how to live and I am patterning my entire retirement plans around his life. Wonderful underrated writer and his outlook on the world in general was beautiful beyond words. Absolutely destroyed me when he killed himself. I have still not fully recovered, still. Every June 8th I find a quiet bar and tip a few glasses back for Tony.

image
 
The left wanted the heart of academia, our cities (culture), and our government. They were successful. The problem they now face is that they have a history in those positions of power and they have failed. @Dionysus444 ignored the question, but inner city experience has gotten worse, not better. Socioeconomic demographics have not changed much since the 1960s, but violence in poor city areas has. Liberals have controlled the narrative in most big cities during that time. The family unit has eroded, as has the church community and respect for individual life, and the outcome of that erosion with liberal political government control has not resulted in a static, but rather a degradation. The civil rights movement created landmark necessities for freedom, but liberal government has not created an environment for the maximizing of those freedoms. If the liberal perspective was healthy, things SHOULD BE better. Are they? We all know the definition of insanity, doing the same things while expecting different outcomes, yet that is what progressives preach. To endure in power absent success, they created boogeymen in the system that cannot be statistically defined or demonstrated, but must be accepted on faith. Turns out THEY are the boogeymen.
 
The left wanted the heart of academia, our cities (culture), and our government. They were successful. The problem they now face is that they have a history in those positions of power and they have failed. @Dionysus444 ignored the question, but inner city experience has gotten worse, not better. Socioeconomic demographics have not changed much since the 1960s, but violence in poor city areas has. Liberals have controlled the narrative in most big cities during that time. The family unit has eroded, as has the church community and respect for individual life, and the outcome of that erosion with liberal political government control has not resulted in a static, but rather a degradation. The civil rights movement created landmark necessities for freedom, but liberal government has not created an environment for the maximizing of those freedoms. If the liberal perspective was healthy, things SHOULD BE better. Are they? We all know the definition of insanity, doing the same things while expecting different outcomes, yet that is what progressives preach. To endure in power absent success, they created boogeymen in the system that cannot be statistically defined or demonstrated, but must be accepted on faith. Turns out THEY are the boogeymen.
Liberals != progressives. There are barely a handful of places in this country where progressives are in charge.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT