Not sure how that's much different than what you posted earlier IMHO.
Not sure how that's much different than what you posted earlier IMHO.
Who's the big eared guy on Fox Channel? Youngish older guy. Reminds me of my buddy who was a post office worker stealing people's mail to support a pain killer addiction.
whips up the masses using whatever means necessary,
yep, which is why i'm not trying to defend the protests. i wish people would do the same thing re: Bannon.Sounds like he got it from the Democrat playbook then. You seen what is happening in the cities?
**a Jew was using antisemitism to advance Breitbart's narratives. It's a Breitbart thing, not a Horwitz thing.
This isn't something new. Bannon has been reviled for years because of this type of stuff. He whips up the masses using whatever means necessary, which is what makes his position in the Oval Office so concerning.
yep, which is why i'm not trying to defend the protests. i wish people would do the same thing re: Bannon.
Drain the swamp meant something else. Muslim ban meant something else. The wall meant something else. Mass deportations meant something else... WTF?
Can't be. Mime is Money says it is all organic.
Welcome. Yeah, demonstrations out here are almost always boring. The Longhorn football team and Charlie Strong's hot-seat are more more important.Downtown Austin tonight for business and heard a ton of sirens, they stopped and then chants of protesters marching below my hotel window. A couple of hundred with signs chanting against Trump. From what I could tell, nothing serious, nothing violent. But interesting to see in person even if it was small. Police cars blocking side streets in front and following behind seemingly leaving them alone.
Welcome. Yeah, demonstrations out here are almost always boring. The Longhorn football team and Charlie Strong's hot-seat are more more important.
60 minute interview lady. They pull her off Hillary's tit long enough to ask The Donald biased angled questions. I'm sooooo sure that same atmosphere would've happened with Hillary, right?
"So how awesome is it know Barak Obama?"
"Hillary you are going to be an inspiration to a lot of women, what's it like to inspire a nation?"
"How great was it to hang with Beyonce and Jay Z?"
"Will the Clinton Foundation continue to be a global human savior?"
I feel quite certain that Hillary Clinton is the ONLY person the dems could have chosen to run who would have lost that election. Isn't that humorous? They cheated to make sure she was the candidate. They cheated to make sure Donald Trump was her opponent. Just another blatant example of liberal delusion.
Dems would have a dollar store where everything costs two dollars. They would have a corner store in the middle of the block. They would put screen doors on submarines. And as we saw yesterday, it does in fact take dems an hour and a half to watch 60 Minutes.
At first, I thought bernie could've won too. But seeing some of these results, he would've lost much worse. The blue collar worker crossed over in waves, and bernie would've just made that even worse with his non stop giveaways.
Look at Elliott county. The ky County had voted democrat since it's creation. Every single election. Trump won by 70%.
Trumps message was resonating in ways no one knew or could've foreseen, except him. I think the only candidate that would've beat him would've been an African American or Latino candidate. Even then I'm not sure.
Once they saw they were up against Trump, they tried to take air out of the ball and play stall ball. The Kaine pick was the consummate example: She picked somebody with whom she wanted to govern, not somebody who expanded either the map or her coalition significantly.My biggest worry was her adding Booker to the ticket
She messed up big league with Kaine dude was more dislikable then her. trump picked a perfecrt VP
The Kaine pick was the consummate example: She picked somebody with whom she wanted to govern, not somebody who expanded either the map or her coalition significantly.
I must've missed whatever conspiracy theory you're invoking. Exactly what leverage did Kaine supposedly have over the Clintons that would've earned him the VP slot?LOL
Yes, Kaine was picked because she wanted to govern with him. Not because he'd been promised the spot in their backroom dealings.
I must've missed whatever conspiracy theory you're invoking. Exactly what leverage did Kaine supposedly have over the Clintons that would've earned him the VP slot?
But the point is they did cheat Bernie. Don't argue that, and, they evidently lost numerous loyalists anyway since several traditionally dem states voted for Donald. No one else they could have nominated would have had the political baggage she lugs around.False.
Everyone talks about them cheating bernie but he would have absolutely been destroyed and democrats would have lost NUMEROUS loyalists.