While I don't condone unwarranted police shootings, we cannot divorce the police shooting from the antecedent intentional reckless behavior of the criminal who is shot. Look at the Akron shooting:
- Tried to flee police instead of stopping his vehicle;
- Discharged a gun while being chased by the police;
- After a 7 minute chase, slowed down and tried to jump out and run away wearing a ski mask.
- Officers attempted to taser, but were unsuccessful
- Turned toward officers during the chase and made a motion toward his waist area.
Yet there are protests, will surely be a lawsuit, lots of media scrutiny of the police, etc. because he was "shot in the back." The police are being held to an extremely strict standard, while the criminal's actions that led to him being shot are not scrutinized or even taken into consideration.
You won't stop your vehicle for police, you lead them on a chase, you discharge a gun while being chased by police, you put on a ski mask and jump out of the vehicle and continue running, you make a motion that makes police believe you are reaching for something after discharging a gun earlier--ding!-ding!-ding!--they have cause.