For those playing the race card as the reason why Trump won, as an Obama voter in 2008 who voted Trump, I present this:
Damn right! Just sit back and enjoy their misery. Have sex doggy style tonight so the spouse can watch the protest with you.Funniest thing about these protests is these people actually believe their 5-10k people out in the streets, acting like morons, is a revolution. They fail to realize the real revolution passed them by. It happened Tuesday night, peacefully, at the ballot box.
In the sense that an inch is as good as a mile?significant.
Yikes! And Machado is too fat huh?
Still 4.3M ballots being processed in CA and nearly a million more in WA.
Her eventual margin will be....significant.
However, AP analyst Michael McDonald, who teaches political science at the University of Florida and runs the United States Elections Project, an election statistics website, says he is skeptical that Trump won Wisconsin, as the AP projected. If that state flips for Clinton and she wins the other toss-up states, she and Trump could be in a tie at 269 votes each.
Rick Scott being mentioned for HHS.
Rick Touching Scott. The former CEO who oversaw such extensive Medicare fraud that his company was slapped with the largest fine in US history.
It was rigged and he won? How does that work exactly?It might have been. Imagine how much he would have won by if dead democrats weren't voting, Soros didn't own the voting machines, the media didn't coordinate behind the scenes with Clinton, etc.
Must be the small hands.Women love the trump. I'm telling you they can't get enough of him.
![]()
![]()
![]()
It could very well happen. I'll accept the outcome and not bitch. Besides, ragging on Hillary is much more fun. (insert evil laugh) hehehehe.http://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-hillary-clinton-election-tie-519696
Read link. These people are pathetic.
However, AP analyst Michael McDonald, who teaches political science at the University of Florida and runs the United States Elections Project, an election statistics website, says he is skeptical that Trump won Wisconsin, as the AP projected. If that state flips for Clinton and she wins the other toss-up states, she and Trump could be in a tie at 269 votes each.
"Can we dance with your dates?"Just saw the trump protest make its way down 4th Street, then main street Louisville. Made up of most all white SJWs.
They marched their selves down a safe, white part of town with police escort. Why not have it on the west end of town? Odd. Considering trump voters are the racists, supposedly
US DOJ, if you want a primary sourceLargest fine in US history? Really? Read that on an SJW's twitter post? Larger than Enron? How much larger? Exaggerate much? Or just lie?
Not sure it matters anymore. She would have to have Arizona in that scenario & it's done.http://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-hillary-clinton-election-tie-519696
Read link. These people are pathetic.
However, AP analyst Michael McDonald, who teaches political science at the University of Florida and runs the United States Elections Project, an election statistics website, says he is skeptical that Trump won Wisconsin, as the AP projected. If that state flips for Clinton and she wins the other toss-up states, she and Trump could be in a tie at 269 votes each.
What do you mean? She isn't going to win by more than the difference in one state.Still 4.3M ballots being processed in CA and nearly a million more in WA.
Her eventual margin will be....significant.
Just saw the trump protest make its way down 4th Street, then main street Louisville. Made up of most all white SJWs.
They marched their selves down a safe, white part of town with police escort. Why not have it on the west end of town? Odd. Considering trump voters are the racists, supposedly
US DOJ, if you want a primary source
Scott has mentioned the (in total) $1.7B in fraud settlements during past campaigns. This isn't some unknown trivia fact.
It could very well happen. I'll accept the outcome and not bitch. Besides, ragging on Hillary is much more fun. (insert evil laugh) hehehehe.
Not sure it matters anymore. She would have to have Arizona in that scenario & it's done.
Still 4.3M ballots being processed in CA and nearly a million more in WA.
Her eventual margin will be....significant.
Because the dems figured their voters would be stereotypical fall in line, follow the leader, and do what they're told. They didn't expect people that voted for Obama to vote TrumpIt was rigged and he won? How does that work exactly?
Just re-enforces what already knew. Thank effing goodness that we have the EC. Or the West coast and some shitty NYers would pretty decide the election.
When did that become illegal? Mercy! This country is going to shit!Because the dems figured their voters would be stereotypical fall in line, follow the leader, and do what they're told. They didn't expect people that voted for Obama to vote Trump
They sent us home at 3:30. The establishment is freakin' out over this.Had to be in OTR tonight. Even though very well gentrified, very glad that Tensing verdict didn't come down.
Didn't wan't to be the white yuppie in a suit getting his car in the middle of a riot.
BP (and Enron, for that matter) happened years after the HCA case and none of this digression on your part makes any difference in what BBI and I were discussing: putting Rick Scott in charge of HHS would look awful.No, it is not . . but even that tally would have to increase before it would reach among the largest corporate fines in US History. Not going to cause you any embarrassment on this. Col.-HCA was fined significantly in what became the "largest fraud settlement" in US history, but that is scarcely the same thing as the largest fine in US history. My strong belief is that your are aware of this, aware of the importance of the difference in these terms, but floated it out there that way anyhow . . . expecting nobody to notice.
scant figures for the wording you used . . . "largest fine in US history" . . . good grief, Jam . . . BP environmental fine alone damn near 20B, dude.
Bro, I read in '08 the McCain/Palin (*gag*) campaign kicked off with something like ~175 million. If the Trump numbers are true, then DAYAM!If I read correctly. Hillary spent $2 billion dollars (Both Obama and Romney combined). and Trump spent $100 million. No lobbyist money.
Man. mind is just blown
Bro, I read in '08 the McCain/Palin (*gag*) campaign kicked off with something like ~175 million. If the Trump numbers are true, then DAYAM!
+1Yeah, amazing. Trump pretty much proved that money doesn't matter
+1
I spoke with a few Latino colleagues over the past day. Many here in Texas, and from what I understand, many in FL, simply broke for Trump. All want change, and could not connect with Hillary. Remember, Texas is now over 50% Latino. A few said to me they wanted real hope and change. I read the same about Cuban-Americans outside south FL
They weren't racist when they voted O'bama, we turned em.Because the dems figured their voters would be stereotypical fall in line, follow the leader, and do what they're told. They didn't expect people that voted for Obama to vote Trump