ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%
  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
About as meaningless as Jackson’s answer.

I’m old enough to remember when Ted Cruz ask ACB if she played the piano. Did her kids take lessons? Now that’s hard hitting questions.

I agree, but I guess he at least asked some questions. I also suspect if we go back and look at the context, it will probably not be as bad as you’re portraying.

Despite that, it doesn’t come close to the issue of a potential sitting member on the US Supreme Court not knowing what a woman is. That can have major implications on some decisions in the future. It also speaks to her severe lack of intelligence.

No one ever had doubts about ACB and whether she was smarter than a 3 year old. Dems attacked her because she believes in god and she’s a mom.
 
About as meaningless as Jackson’s answer.

I’m old enough to remember when Ted Cruz ask ACB if she played the piano. Did her kids take lessons? Now that’s hard hitting questions.

Do you also agree that Rs are stepping over the line by asking about her incredibly light sentencing of pedos? As a father to young children, I find that incredibly disgusting no matter which side of the aisle the candidate was on.

She believes the crime isn’t as bad because of the easy access these days. That completely ignores the fact demand for those pictures drives up the likelihood of more children getting abused and exploited. It’s a truly truly awful thing and should be met with the highest of penalties, end of story.

Unfortunately a few left leaning members of this board have shown sympathy to pedos. I don’t know why, but you lefties seem to be ok with child sex and exploitation. It’s extremely disturbing.

Edited to add this also plays in to the Dems outrage over that Florida bill. You lefty’s want to sexualize children and it’s truly disgusting. Kindergartners don’t need to learn about gay, straight, trans, or any other sexual orientation. They’re kids, which are not sexual beings. Allow them to be children without the sexual exploitation. You guys are just a bunch of twisted child loving f@cks.
 
Last edited:
That’s a Field Trip not a spring break vacation. You coulda seen boobies dude. Boobies!!! And you chose the National Archives.

lol. When my brother was a senior I went to Panama City with him for spring break. I was walking down the street trying to find an arcade and a car pulled up and some girls flashed me. The greatest moment of my freshman year by far.
 
FOpwqPXWQAUnVFE
 
Stern has always been a blowhard Lib. At one time he was all about rebelling against the elite but he got rich and then craved being accepted into their club. His biggest fans are just so addicted to his show they won’t leave but have to think he has lost a lot of listeners over the past 5+ years. I stopped listening several years ago because his show simply was not funny anymore.
 
Colorado passed an abortion bill much like New York and Virginia(?).

'The bill does not allow for any parental notification or age restrictions for abortion.'
'Young women, of any age, of any maturity, could receive an abortion without parents even being notified it happened to their daughter.'

 
And just a reminder. Most of the political parties in Ukraine are socialist, Communist or facist. There aren't a whole lot of free market conservatives coming in that bunch.
I totally believe this because most who are free market conservatives are already here. I say this because a close friend married a man from Ukraine and he told me so. He is more conservative than 95% of us on this board.

And since coming to America he has made a fortune in real estate.
 
Do you also agree that Rs are stepping over the line by asking about her incredibly light sentencing of pedos? As a father to young children, I find that incredibly disgusting no matter which side of the aisle the candidate was on.

She believes the crime isn’t as bad because of the easy access these days. That completely ignores the fact demand for those pictures drives up the likelihood of more children getting abused and exploited. It’s a truly truly awful thing and should be met with the highest of penalties, end of story.

Unfortunately a few left leaning members of this board have shown sympathy to pedos. I don’t know why, but you lefties seem to be ok with child sex and exploitation. It’s extremely disturbing.

Edited to add this also plays in to the Dems outrage over that Florida bill. You lefty’s want to sexualize children and it’s truly disgusting. Kindergartners don’t need to learn about gay, straight, trans, or any other sexual orientation. They’re kids, which are not sexual beings. Allow them to be children without the sexual exploitation. You guys are just a bunch of twisted child loving f@cks.
Who sets the sentencing guidelines? I have kids too and no where have I expressed sympathy for pedifiles. Who starts the threads that glorify women teachers having sex with 14 year olds? Not me. And then you all line up to say you “wood”.
 
I agree, but I guess he at least asked some questions. I also suspect if we go back and look at the context, it will probably not be as bad as you’re portraying.

Despite that, it doesn’t come close to the issue of a potential sitting member on the US Supreme Court not knowing what a woman is. That can have major implications on some decisions in the future. It also speaks to her severe lack of intelligence.

No one ever had doubts about ACB and whether she was smarter than a 3 year old. Dems attacked her because she believes in god and she’s a mom.
She is every bit as smart at ACB. And go back and read the questions ACB would not answer. Spoiler alert it’s a lot.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Bigblue2023
Who sets the sentencing guidelines? I have kids too and no where have I expressed sympathy for pedifiles. Who starts the threads that glorify women teachers having sex with 14 year olds? Not me. And then you all line up to say you “wood”.

That’s the problem with Jackson, there are federal sentencing guidelines that called for more than 10 years in prison! She gave them 3 months…I’ll say it again, 3 MONTHS!!! Then she rationalized it without providing one shred of case law to justify her incredibly light sentencing for pedos. You should try reading about this before blindly throwing your support behind this woman, oh sorry, I’m not a biologist, so I shouldn’t call her that.

As far as your strawman argument, I’m not going to waste my time. I don’t participate in those threads and actually know nothing about them. Has zero to do with this discussion.
 
She is every bit as smart at ACB. And go back and read the questions ACB would not answer. Spoiler alert it’s a lot.

There is nothing more to say to someone who gets just about everything so incredibly wrong.

I don’t expect the nominees to be perfect and know the answer to every question. That’s not realistic. I do however expect them to know what a woman is and not defend pedos.

That’s an extremely low bar that Jackson can’t clear.
 
There is nothing more to say to someone who gets just about everything so incredibly wrong.

I don’t expect the nominees to be perfect and know the answer to every question. That’s not realistic. I do however expect them to know what a woman is and not defend pedos.

That’s an extremely low bar that Jackson can’t clear.
Do you own a mirror?
 

Noone in good faith can vote to confirm this fool or a judge. Not only is her record absolutely abhorrent but time and again she displays an inability to grasp the simple most fundamental aspects of her job and function.

She has no idea if she believes in deterrence yet deterrence is a major factor required to be considered under 18 usc 3553a when sentencing a defendant. Every party before her that received an objectionable sentence should now just move to set that aside and ask for a new sentencing hearing. If you don't know what it is - you definitely didn't consider it as required.

If she can't define woman in the legal context then she's admitting he's incapable of adjudicating any case that involves sex. That includes among other things any equal protection or title 9 case. Nothing to do with employment discrimination. On and on.

She is one of the most incompetent unqualified judges I ever saw to hold any seat. She literally doesn't know what the law is so instead just makes some judgment call borne out of radical nonsense.
 
I am just amazed that the usual suspects on the Paddock are against Biden's Supreme Court nominee. Who would have guessed?? And just about fell in the floor in shock to read this AM that McConnell announced he was against her too. Never saw that one coming. It just goes to show you that incredible things happen some days when you least expect it.
 
Noone in good faith can vote to confirm this fool or a judge. Not only is her record absolutely abhorrent but time and again she displays an inability to grasp the simple most fundamental aspects of her job and function.

She has no idea if she believes in deterrence yet deterrence is a major factor required to be considered under 18 usc 3553a when sentencing a defendant. Every party before her that received an objectionable sentence should now just move to set that aside and ask for a new sentencing hearing. If you don't know what it is - you definitely didn't consider it as required.

If she can't define woman in the legal context then she's admitting he's incapable of adjudicating any case that involves sex. That includes among other things any equal protection or title 9 case. Nothing to do with employment discrimination. On and on.

She is one of the most incompetent unqualified judges I ever saw to hold any seat. She literally doesn't know what the law is so instead just makes some judgment call borne out of radical nonsense.
And the fact that she is (or at least appears) to be a pedo sympathizer as well.
 
I am just amazed that the usual suspects on the Paddock are against Biden's Supreme Court nominee. Who would have guessed?? And just about fell in the floor in shock to read this AM that McConnell announced he was against her too. Never saw that one coming. It just goes to show you that incredible things happen some days when you least expect it.
Wonder why they oppose her 🤔🤔🤔🤔
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Bigblue2023
I am just amazed that the usual suspects on the Paddock are against Biden's Supreme Court nominee. Who would have guessed?? And just about fell in the floor in shock to read this AM that McConnell announced he was against her too. Never saw that one coming. It just goes to show you that incredible things happen some days when you least expect it.
Are we supposed to just not care she’s been incredibly lenient on pedos? And not care that she hasn’t given a reasonable explanation as to why? Not care that she can’t answer a simple f’n question about the definition of a woman?

Please, give us your take as to why she should be confirmed. And your take as to why those above issues aren’t important.

And, please, give us something more than just “y’all just a bunch of racist misogynists”.

There is a time and place for legit discourse over legit concerns, you know.
 
It is all political posturing, she just got confirmed for the DC Circuit last year 53-47. Be honest, you guys would be against any S Ct nominee Biden puts up, the reasons may differ from one candidate to the other, but you still would be against the choice, as would Cruz, McConnell, Hawley, et al. Anyone could see from 100 miles away that the vote is going to end up 51-50, or maybe 51-49 if a Republican breaks ranks, but Jackson is going to get confirmed.

As for me, I preferred Childs from South Carolina, a state court judge who went to public universities, breaking up the Harvard-Yale-Columbia Ivy League cartel.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT