I was listening to Rieketa Law podcast today. He said that most of these cases weren't just having images of 15 or 16 yo kids that might of looked 18. In one video an 8 yo girl was beaten and raped. Tons of the stuff on these computers were similar. It wasn't a mistake or curiosity.... This is evil shit and this lady and Mittens are OK with 1yr in jail for this crap.
dailycaller.com
Hell did Biden actually pick his VP?
Ahh, some lefty has the sads. The author says it was a bad faith question.
I try not to assume anything about people, including their sexual orientation.
Well, here’s the big surprise. Some people don’t hide that they are gay and some straight people seem to think they need to advocate for gay people by attacking those who don’t fit their judgmental perspective.
IMO, setting districts is a political decision, not a legal one. I.e., the courts should stay out of it.
Then there's no reason for it to be important to have a black woman on the USSC. I means blacks already have their 11% quota on the court. Who cares? It's not important.
Certainly shouldn't have art & music scholarships then either.
Thanks. New word on me. Will have to figure out how to make it mine.
I don't consider disagreeing with people that think gays shouldn't have the same rights as me, including the right to marry someone they love, advocating for gay people. If I'm advocating for anything, it is equal rights for all people.
Our federal government and 49 out of 50 states are based on English common law. Words mean things. I hope you own property because your property rights are almost entirely based on English common law. There are people in congress that want to change property rights. Imagine losing some of your property because aoc decides "private property" doesn't mean you own it exclusively.
While you are correct that most American legal principles originated based up the common law principles brought from England, 250 years later it is American common law. Which, by the way, has been modified by our Supreme Court to make sure that our laws evolve with the times. Your simple argument seems to be that "marriage" has historically been defined as a union between 1 man and 1 woman and that definition should not be changed. Do you think that the definition of "men" and "equal" should have been changed? At one point, "all men are created equal" only applied to land owning white males. Thanks to our Supreme Court, it now means men and women of every race. Do you disagree with that?
Nope. The founders had to keep the union together and negotiated as best they could. The original document was much stronger anti slavery but half the country wouldn't vote for it so they worked in language to change things in the future. Even Fredick Douglas said that everything they needed to end slavery was in the constitution.
Those are degree subjects. Football isn’t. Very different. And that’s coming from a rabid pigskin fan.
Re: the far right is into fitness
As soon as people realize how whacked out media members are becoming this whole thing crashes down. They are effing lunatics.
We agree on this point. No one is arguing for pedophiles. You are twisting a single case that you know nothing about and the sentence that was handed down on that case. By the way, I'm fairly moderate, but just think that a person's choice on who to marry should be, and finally now is, a protected right. That is what this discussion was about, right? pun intended
With NIL I agree with you. The argument was always- they should be treated like regular students. Well they can pay for school like the rest of us, and get an academic scholarship like the rest of us could go for
I could care less if a black woman is on SCOTUS. of course I could also care less if a bunch more old crusty white guys are there. They make like a half dozen rulings each year that have no effect on my life.
Graham voted to confirm Jackson last year to the DC appeals circuit. That limp dick loser just likes to run his mouth in front of cameras. He doesn't believe anything he says and changes his tunes every other day.
We are putting a pronoun on the Supreme Court who can not define what a woman is? Pronoun will be involved in interpreting law and has no clue what a woman is. When she answered she did not know she should have been escorted out of the room and sent back to her house or better yet a mental ward at the local hospital.
