We are putting a pronoun on the Supreme Court who can not define what a woman is? Pronoun will be involved in interpreting law and has no clue what a woman is. When she answered she did not know she should have been escorted out of the room and sent back to her house or better yet a mental ward at the local hospital.For the record though. Lea Thomas has a penis and has a girlfriend that he has sex with. Im trying to figure out how this dude doesn't have a mental disorder?... or just screaming for attn. Social media is driving people crazy. Hell, people are defending pedo's now too. I don't think any moral line will be left by 2024.
For the record though. Lea Thomas has a penis and has a girlfriend that he has sex with. Im trying to figure out how this dude doesn't have a mental disorder?... or just screaming for attn. Social media is driving people crazy. Hell, people are defending pedo's now too. I don't think any moral line will be left by 2024.
Ahh, some lefty has the sads. The author says it was a bad faith question.
It was a simple question w huge impacts.
What truly is bad faith is accusing someone of gang rape with no gang and no rape. THAT was bad faith and im sure the idiot author cheered it on.
Well, if you think your baseless judgmental approach to others is helping gay people, then at least you are serving yourself well.I don't consider disagreeing with people that think gays shouldn't have the same rights as me, including the right to marry someone they love, advocating for gay people. If I'm advocating for anything, it is equal rights for all people.
I remember before Trump picked Brett Kavanaugh, I said if Trump picks a man for the SCOTUS. That some old warped mined pro abortion whore would come forward & accuse him of rape. They did it to Clarence Thomas, they did it to Brett Kavanaugh. This is how deep in the gutter that the democrat party lives.
Any question (not softball type) is a loaded question because liberal politicians know that if they give the correct backed up by science or proof answer that does not fit the construct of delusional snowflakes (most of their base) they will be destroyed.Ahh, some lefty has the sads. The author says it was a bad faith question.
It was a simple question w huge impacts.
What truly is bad faith is accusing someone of gang rape with no gang and no rape. THAT was bad faith and im sure the idiot author cheered it on.
Great post. I am amazed at the number of UK fans who are supporting this craziness. But I am disturbed at the leadership in this country that promotes this insanity. They are destroying the very fabric of humanity. And for what reason?Some of you are out of your damn mind. Not letting a biological male compete in womens sports is not discrimination or a loss of rights in any way shape or form. A trans woman is really just a form of being male. You’re not magically a biological female if you take some meds.
Want trans and everyone else to have the same rights and not be discriminated against in any way. Biological men compete with biological men and biological women compete with biological women. Easy and done, no debate or controversy.
What truly astounds me is how people championing this insanity can’t see how they are absolutely trampling on womens rights. Just a few short years ago, we needed to save all women from the patriarchy. Now we’re not even allowed to say what a real woman is. Very sad for the empower all women movement…
In reality he is going to South American countries to invite new voters to come to the American border and get free stuff because he does not think they can cheat enough in the next election to win.
That is an awfully simplistic look at the “evolution” of the law in this country. You give high praise to government for fixing a wrong it perpetuated and protected for years. Maybe it will fix the wrong it created when it permitted the most vulnerable to be murdered daily. I hope your advocacy for the rights of the oppressed is not limited. The right to live seems fairly basic and fundamental.While you are correct that most American legal principles originated based up the common law principles brought from England, 250 years later it is American common law. Which, by the way, has been modified by our Supreme Court to make sure that our laws evolve with the times. Your simple argument seems to be that "marriage" has historically been defined as a union between 1 man and 1 woman and that definition should not be changed. Do you think that the definition of "men" and "equal" should have been changed? At one point, "all men are created equal" only applied to land owning white males. Thanks to our Supreme Court, it now means men and women of every race. Do you disagree with that?
Why does this issue have to be black/white; either/or?
I have friends and family with transgender kids, think they should have every right to a happy life that anyone else does, and should not be discriminated against, hope we all agree with that. They are not crazy, most are very unhappy people trying to become happy,
I appreciate your passion, just not the shotgun approach you take toward others in the name of your “advocacy.” I also understand how social justice warriors want the government to change things to the way they think it should be. While I know there is a definition of marriage that will never include gay unions, I never advocated against government recognizing gay unions. While I think government recognized “marriage” is an antiquated concept that really mainly serves government while intellectually identifying the reasons why government would historically not recognize gay unions (encouraging traditional marriage was a compelling interest for a young government that wanted to increase its populace in a way that encouraged the integrity of the family - gay unions don’t grow the populace), that idea has less to no import today. Government counts too much ($$$$ and control) on its recognition of marriage to undo what it created. So, I had no problem with it expanding its recognition.We agree on this point. No one is arguing for pedophiles. You are twisting a single case that you know nothing about and the sentence that was handed down on that case. By the way, I'm fairly moderate, but just think that a person's choice on who to marry should be, and finally now is, a protected right. That is what this discussion was about, right? pun intended
Intelligent thought lmao. Just another way to put most everyone else on this board down with the I am superior to you peasants lol. Hey intelligent thought guru here is a question for you. What happens when a 40 year old man is caught having a relationship with a 15 year old girl and the girl gave consent? Is it still statutory rape? It happens a lot and yes it should still be statutory rape. But some out there are now trying to lower the accountability which is just a simple way to muddy the waters and open the door to make it more accepted because it isn't that person fault as "They have a disease" Bullshit. They have a mental issue plain and simple.Everyone that’s incapable of intelligent thought likes to bring that up because they are too stupid to realize that animals and children can’t consent.
They're physical activities. Degree doesn't matter if offered by the school. It's a matter of a school's choice.Those are degree subjects. Football isn’t. Very different. And that’s coming from a rabid pigskin fan.
Intelligent thought lmao. Just another way to put most everyone else on this board down with the I am superior to you peasants lol. Hey intelligent thought guru here is a question for you. What happens when a 40 year old man is caught having a relationship with a 15 year old girl and the girl gave consent? Is it still statutory rape? It happens a lot and yes it should still be statutory rape. But some out there are now trying to lower the accountability which is just a simple way to muddy the waters and open the door to make it more accepted because it isn't that person fault as "They have a disease" Bullshit. They have a mental issue plain and simple.
They sure as hell can get confused when asked to define what a woman is, but they sure as hell have no problem defining what a man is, and it's not a good definition.
OK with f-ing France, but why here?Look at the list of the equipment and supplies sent to Ukraine. Damn. Oh, and effing France, LOL.
As they should, It's moronic. However, It's only going to cause more unruly and panicked Karen's losing their shit the first time they have to sit next to an unmasked person.
Well, they are running for political office. I can't find any current elected officials on it.![]()
Biden demands Dr. Oz, Herschel Walker step down amid Senate runs
President Joe Biden requested that two members of the President's Council on Sports, Fitness & Nutrition who were appointed by former President Donald Trump either step down or face termination amid their Senate runs in Georgia and Pennsylvania.www.foxnews.com
They’ll probably fly 100k Haitians to Ukraine and then back to the US.
That shit (Covid) stays in your system for several months. I believe i must have had it right after Christmas, I had a bit of what seemed like a cold, but guess it was the Omicron. Anyways, a couple months later I had to cancel a work trip because a PCR test said I tested positive, while having literally zero symptoms. In fact I felt better than I had in a long time having lost about 25 lbs. since the first of the year. Not even a sniffle. Took the home test twice, both times negative. So I essentially had a false positive.If you test positive twice after being double vax'd... Is it a breakthrough case? When will they admit the jab hurts natural immunity?
Brings back memories of the beginnings of the Patriot Act.https://www.lex18.com/news/lex-in-d...9Yj6aSZCk41-gJfPvW2b1-Uk2nGtv4m7LXU_CPwg2PA_4
License plate readers coming soon to Lexington
Lexington police are planning to install 25 license plate reader cameras across the city in April.
Assistant Chief Eric Lowe told the urban county council in March the main goal is to reduce crime, locate and recover missing or endangered people.
“We believe it will have an effect on all crime in the city,” said Lowe.
The city will get the cameras at no cost for the year in exchange for their partnership with Flock Safety, Axon Enterprise, and the National Police Foundation for a nationwide study.
The cameras take 6-7 still images of cars as they pass but do not take video. They can read plates, determine the color, make and type of cars, which would all be searchable by police.
Police say they will not be used to enforce traffic violations like speed limits or red lights. The photos are stored for 30 days and then deleted.
Vehicles will automatically be checked to see if they are on a hotlist, and law enforcement is notified. However, Lowe told the council vehicles and plates cannot be searched without first entering a reason for the search. He added, even when a suspected vehicle is located, officers are advised to use reasonable suspicion and probable cause to confirm the validity of making a stop.
This is a classic bait and switch. I do not believe any of this shit. Images will not be deleted. This is a mass surveillance system presented with "It's for your safety" bullshit.
The question is, should it be a degree subject? For the few who are able to make it to the NFL or NBA, Football or Basketball IS their career subject. And they should have a curriculum based around that. Teach them money skills, Public speaking skills, marketing skills. And that's coming from a guy with a son who's a music major and worries about what he's going to be able to do with that after college.Those are degree subjects. Football isn’t. Very different. And that’s coming from a rabid pigskin fan.
So you admit Trump was able to Keep NK from being a threat to the rest of the world.Lil rocket boy is sad Fat Cheeto isn't there anymore to send him love letters and bow down to his Generals. Fired one of his big boy missiles to try and get some new attention.