Gassy bringing the fire as always.
Classic. Keep it up, man. Hope they don't come for you. Lol.
Classic. Keep it up, man. Hope they don't come for you. Lol.
POLITICAL THREAD
- Thread starter kybobcat
- Start date
Well, yeah. And (spoiler) they seem to all gravitate towards the biological parents being option 1 in ye olde structure of society, regardless of religion. East, West, you name it. It’s almost like it’s natural. Mind blowing, right?
I guess it’s opinion because nobody seems to have made any of this a fact yet with the proper research. So you’ve got me there.
Not a coincidence that the NYT, the left’s newspaper, picks now to “confirm” the story from two years ago. They appear to be making their move to get rid of Biden within the year (still need to make it to Jan 2023 to not count against the term).
Still no answer for Kamala though.
Still no answer for Kamala though.
Yeah, historically, a loving mature biological mother and father make the best most suitable parents. That really is not debatable.
You completely missed my point by jumping into a response that was not directed at your comment.
MSNBC guest says Josh Hawley is ‘trying to get’ Biden’s SCOTUS nominee ‘killed’ by criticizing her record
“Let’s be very clear: what Josh Hawley is doing when he tries to do this—is he’s trying to get her killed,” the MSNBC guest said. “He is trying to get violence done against a Supreme Court nominee.”
thepostmillennial.com
Escalating this “war” is the way to accelerate the implementation of the Great Rest, New Workd Order, etc. Unbelievably, hardened conservatives like Mark Levin, are falling for this crap.
Same. I've probably read (listened on audible to) more books the last 3 years, than I have the previous 20 years. Those hours are a complete waste. College football is the only sport I still watch and that is because of time of the year its just great. Books and authors I never thought I'd get to I finally got to. LOL.
Man, this country has really fallen off a cliff. We now celebrate an ex president winning a lawsuit vs a porn star. We defend presidents who oversee record inflation. If you can look at the landscape and decide that one side is at fault, you probably need to start smoking weed every night. All politicians are criminals who give zero shits about us. It's time to take it back. We started a war with England over a 3% tax on tea. We now pay north of 50% of our income in taxes when you figure it all in, and it's been that way for the last 50 years. Anything we are punished with now, it's because we accept it, period.
Which goes to the point of changing the definition of words. Well regulated, at the time of writing the constitution, had a different meaning. It meant in ready order and able and well armed. So you change a definition and then tell me about the constitution. This is why definitions mean things.
Most of law is based on English common law. We knew what that stuff meant. You can get lawyers to tell how a lot of that old stuff has just been crushed due to new ways of interpreting meaning, reasoning, intent... or whatever...;. but they tell you it was always what it said. LOl.
Have you not been paying attention? This whole ordeal started because of this woman’s religion.
I get the histrionics, especially considering how Gorsuch and Kavanaugh (bothMSNBC guest says Josh Hawley is ‘trying to get’ Biden’s SCOTUS nominee ‘killed’ by criticizing her record
“Let’s be very clear: what Josh Hawley is doing when he tries to do this—is he’s trying to get her killed,” the MSNBC guest said. “He is trying to get violence done against a Supreme Court nominee.”
moderate nominees) were treated by the dems. But this confirmation is inevitable. Just let it go and take the high road for next time.
Last edited:
Twitter just suspended the account that was documenting Ukrainian violence against their own citizens.
That ship has sailed. Some of you seem to forget that it was something like 16 out 18 states, that put gay marriage on the ballot, it lost, including California... the right wing religious center of America. People just used to understand what it meant.
Do you think we should allow polygamy? How about allowing incest marriages? How about bestiality marriages? Please explain how you justify the first and not these last 3.
LolMSNBC guest says Josh Hawley is ‘trying to get’ Biden’s SCOTUS nominee ‘killed’ by criticizing her record
“Let’s be very clear: what Josh Hawley is doing when he tries to do this—is he’s trying to get her killed,” the MSNBC guest said. “He is trying to get violence done against a Supreme Court nominee.”
Yes, that’s totally what conservatives are known for.
But three and a half years ago, the left orchestrated a spectacle where they accused a man of being a “gang rapist” and unleashed the most insane women to try and take over the building.
No... The media made it about her because she was an easy target. Just like they do on most issues they can't defend the actual law.
California voted against gay marriage. It was a court order that changed state laws. It's not an uncontitutional law because marriage is a state issue. So a Judge got to make up law. If you don't see the slippery slope argument with that then good luck on the streets.
Kavanaugh has gone above and beyond proving that he is nowhere near a right wing guy. Same with Barrett and Gorsuch. The GOP nominates moderate judges who interpret the law as it should be interpreted. The left nominates judges who will continue to take us further off the cliff. I think the GOP should let this one go with minimal pushback. They are just going to piss off women and blacks. Not the best ROI.
Last edited:
Let the kiddie diddlers out themselves and then fire them all.
Man, I would KILL for the Great Rest. Working is hard. Can you point me in the direction of candidates who are pro Rest?
The fbi actually verified it was true when they arrested Project Veritas reporters for buying stolen property. So Joe molesting his daughter in the shower was actually what she wrote.
Except it is debatable. “Historically” means nothing. Literally. It’s psycho babble. Human history is also cavalcade of tragedy. But I digress.
Let’s assume for the sake of argument that the way you think to raise a kid is the ideal way. With this, we must almost assume that your concept of idealism extends beyond your ideas and has some type of universal objective truth. Now, let’s name the 100,000 behaviors a parent exhibits that are “less than ideal”. How far do you go enforcing your idealism?
Our next Supreme court justice.
She's not optimal. But we have to deal with what we can. Trump nominated moderate dudes, the left will nominate far left people. Have to trust the process. It will all play out in the long run.
Many of us knew about it. Thot it was pretty common knowledge at the time.
Not true. Every person who discriminated against gays prior to 20 years ago was, and probably still is, a close minded bigot.
Where? Marriage was the union of one man and 10 pre-pubescent little girls all over the world for ever. Just because it has been 1 man and 1 woman on your 40 acres doesn't mean it is right.
The problem is marriage as we know it, is a legal thing. While you can make it a religious thing by getting married in whatever church you choose, it is a legal thing defined by state and federal statutes that bestows privileges and obligations on people that choose to enter the marriage. Because it is sanctioned by government, it is subject to the 5th and 14th amendments which allows everyone due process before liberty is taken from them and promises equal protection of the law (think the law of marriage and the benefits that bestows) to all citizens.
Bad analogy if you are saying that by the Supreme Court saying that states can't ban gay marriage is the same as forcing you to share your partnership money with employees. The Supreme Court did not say that you have to let a gay person join your marriage. It just said that if two other people want to start their own business partnership, just like you and your business partner did, it doesn't matter who they sleep with. It doesn't affect your business partnership at all, unless your argument is that it creates too many partnerships and now you have to compete against others now, which is a completely unamerican anti capitalist argument.
California voted against their gay marriage ballot initiative. People are forgetting what marriage meant and have just accepted that marriage just is.
I generally think that people that call anyone a "non-believer" is an idiot, because they mean "someone that doesn't believe what I do." Are Jews and Muslims "non-believers"? How about Buddhists and Hindus? I'm not biblically ignorant, but I realize that it is a conglomeration of books written over thousands of years, in different genres and not to be taken literally in all circumstances as so many people try to do. Anyone that believes that Noah built a boat and put 2 of every animal on earth on it is stupid.
You can't read. Im not even debating religion in this whole entire thing. Its pointless with respect to law. The constitution gives all powers not specifically given to the federal government, to the states. That means states can regulate marriage as they see fit. California could of voted in gay marriage but they didn't. Oddly... the left went to the courts to correct this "error". They didn't even try to re-do the California vote.
And I agree the ship has sailed and gay marriage has legal precedent now. But what none of you want to admit is that just changing legal definitions all willy nilly.... means that no law means what it meant when it was passed.
You are mad I don't agree with you marrying a dude and think Im making a moral judgment on you... but Im not. I think you should be able to enter a contractual agreement for how insurance, power of attorney and inheritance is adjucated in court. You have the exact same rights under law but you can't call it marriage.
If I win a little league championship I can't claim to be a superbowl champion. Words mean things.
I had to do a double take. Two intelligent well reasoned responses in a row.
What always amuses me is the right wingers love to dismiss other people as emotional snowflakes and cancel culture when that is classic projection as it is exactly what they themselves are and do. They can't differentiate a legal argument (flag burning is a classic example of their complete inability to grasp large complex constitutional arguments) from emotional knee-jerk reaction.
Marriage affords legal protections and economic advantages to citizens. You can't equally pursue liberty if some are advantaged while others are left out because you don't agree with the way they live or pursue their love interests. I personally do not like a lot of things and yet I allow space for them to do as they will and seek happiness as they see fit without impressing or demanding they live the way I do.
Legal marriage is a contract between two people. It does not endorse family size, shape, or bestow morality upon the recipients. Should be obvious but amidst the frothing mob it never can be. When you're sitting there bored in your small life you must supplement it with something to hate on as there's only so many rocks you can skip across the pond. Dullards come to life when they get the opportunity to light their torches and the internet has given them the biggest torch of all to ignite their seething hatreds of "others" besetting them on all sides and borders.
Latest posts
-
-
-
-
Football ****** UK Football Spring Practice Notes - March 10 *****- Latest: kyhankypanky
