POLITICAL THREAD

[sambowieshin]

This is total stupidity. We'd be at $2-2.50 gas with Trump as Prez as we'd be energy indepedent. To claim otherwise is moronic.

With Trump handling Afgan better, Putin would not have been emboldened to attack Ukr. Net, there would have been no Ukr to handle. Fact.

Dictators respected Trump due to his not telling them beforehand what he wouldn't do. Unpredictable. Libs take that as a negative. It's an effective strategy. NATO members own not spending on defense, not Trump. But Biden got it done by encouraging a Euro war. Good job, Joe.

Just how is the Biden Empire any less corrupt than Trump? How is Biden at all effective on the world stage?

Your above post is the most ridiculous in a long time.

That's your opinion. Here are some facts....Trump lost and global warming is real.

'Not a good sign': The temperature was 70 degrees above average near South Pole, a troubling record

It was 70 degrees Fahrenheit warmer than average in Antarctica, while areas of the Arctic are more than 50 degrees Fahrenheit warmer than the average.

www.usatoday.com

 

[Mash 2.4]

That's your opinion. Here are some facts....Trump lost and global warming is real.

'Not a good sign': The temperature was 70 degrees above average near South Pole, a troubling record

It was 70 degrees Fahrenheit warmer than average in Antarctica, while areas of the Arctic are more than 50 degrees Fahrenheit warmer than the average.

www.usatoday.com

You should read your links more carefully sambowieshill

Meier and University of Wisconsin meteorologist Matthew Lazzara say the Antarctica heat wave is a rare occurrence rather than a significant sign of climate change. What likely happened was “a big atmospheric river” pumped in warm and moist air from the Pacific southward, Meier said.

 

[drainthatub]

Who’s worse, Joe Biden or John Calipari?

 

[AustinTXCat]

thats the whole point of why the oil market is bullshit. When oil futures go up republicans do their song and dance and oil companies use it as cover to immediately jack up gas prices overnight. When oil futures go down republicans are completely quiet and gas prices take months to move back down. Republicans should be on TV right now cheering the oil falling and telling oil companies to quit gouging for their greedy shareholders. But they can't do that because it would help Biden and party is more important than country in Team politics.

* KA - BOOM *

 

[bkingUK]

Well state law would have to regulate contracts between people. I agree its nobody's business, and if the taxes weren't affected, then most people wouldn't care if people just signed a paper or got married in a church or drank each others blood and swore to live as the great Rishka commands.

But we have inheritance and children to worry about legally speaking. It would suck for you and I to enter into a business partnership and our business become worth $4million and then some judge change the definition of partnership and give part of our co to some employee that didn't invest any money into the co....

It’s funny because I made a trip to the Frazier History Museum yesterday and there was an exhibit about west Louisville, which is historically the black area of Louisville. Part of the exhibit covered the history and controversy around bussing, which basically put racial quotas on public schools. And there was a historic photo there showing tens of thousands of people protesting against bussing in the early 70’s.

But front and center there was this lady with a sign that read “Forced Bussing is Against God’s Will.”

Now, regardless on the merits of bussing or anyone’s opinion on it,,,that’s not really my point. It’s that a certain segment finds ways to use religion to justify things that have nothing to do with religion. Many did the same with slavery and you’re doing that now.

Your counter to that, of course, will be citing that the Bible states homosexuality is wrong, but then you’ll ignore the fact that the Bible was translated from Hebrew to other languages and that context has been lost. You also ignore the ample literature and study from theologians who disagree with that interpretation. At the end of the day, you’re attempting to use a holy book to justify things you’re uncomfortable with or have been indoctrinated to think.

 

[hmt5000]

It’s funny because I made a trip to the Frazier History Museum yesterday and there was an exhibit about west Louisville, which is historically the black area of Louisville. Part of the exhibit covered the history and controversy around bussing, which basically put racial quotas on public schools. And there was a historic photo there showing tens of thousands of people protesting against bussing in the early 70’s.

But front and center there was this lady with a sign that read “Forced Bussing is Against God’s Will.”

Now, regardless on the merits of bussing or anyone’s opinion on it,,,that’s not really my point. It’s that a certain segment finds ways to use religion to justify things that have nothing to do with religion. Many did the same with slavery and you’re doing that now.

 

[bkingUK]

Ah, shouldn’t have expected educated response. Gg

 

[hmt5000]

Ah, shouldn’t have expected educated response. Gg

Well you didn't make a coherent argument. Did you really just equate discrimination against a human for their skin color with not agreeing to change the definition of words? Do you not see how crazy that is?

 

[bkingUK]

Well you didn't make a coherent argument. Did you really just equate discrimination against a human for their skin color with not agreeing to change the definition of words? Do you not see how crazy that is?

You’re being intentionally obtuse and trying to use straw man arguments to make a point. Also, now that you’re falling back to the “words can’t change argument”, you’re really throwing a white flag. But I’ll bite.

Ephesians 6:5-8 states:
“Slaves, be obedient to your human masters with fear and trembling, in sincerity of heart, as to Christ”

Is slavery wrong @hmt5000? Do you believe slaves should be obedient to their masters?

 

[hmt5000]

You’re being intentionally obtuse and trying to use straw man arguments to make a point. Also, now that you’re falling back to the “words can’t change argument”, you’re really throwing a white flag. But I’ll bite.

Ephesians 6:5-8 states:
“Slaves, be obedient to your human masters with fear and trembling, in sincerity of heart, as to Christ”

Is slavery wrong @hmt5000? Do you believe slaves should be obedient to their masters?

Was the constitution of the USA written during the bible? Now who's being obtuse and making straw man arguments. The fact is that states have the right to set marriage standards. As long as homos have the same legal rights as heteros, in the legal sense, then changing the definition of a word is wrong. The same way we have changed the 1st amendment to mean that violence in OK under the first amendment if you oppose the right person but its totally illegal if you are for that person. Or the 2nd amendment says the government can't infringe our right to own a firearm but yet there are 33 states that impose huge restrictions on gun ownership.

Or how about 4th amendment rights.... We have the right to be secure in our houses, papers, persons and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures. Well the Jan 6 committee just asked tech co's for info on citizens without a warrant and they got it. Cops pull people out of their cars and search them with absolutely no reasonable presumption of a crime. The Obama doj got fisa warrants on the Trump campaign knowing that he didn't break any laws.

Or how about the 5th amendment?





Weird how dems can plead the 5th but Pubs are presumed guilty for asserting 5th amendment rights. Thats what changing definitions to fit a narrative leads to. I know you don't care because you don't actually care about the constitution as a document or its positives on the world and our lives.

 

[TheFrontRunner]

 

[TheFrontRunner]

 

[TheFrontRunner]

" A Burger King spokesman called the incident 'unacceptable'." haha

 

[bigblueinsanity]

 

[bigblueinsanity]

 

[AustinTXCat]

View embedded media

Back 2007-2008, I worked a part-time gig analyzing distance learning programs offered by colleges and universities. We compared degree and certificate pricing on hundreds of colleges across the USA. Until Selection Sunday, I had no idea St. Peter's even existed.

 

[Nbacats]

Considering a healthy or unhealthy society impacts all members of it, yes I’d say how children turn out is everyone’s business.

Now, does anyone have a right to force people how to raise children? Of course not and I never argued otherwise.

All other things equal, do you disagree that a heterosexual married household is the best environment for children to be raised in?

A household with two parental figures is best. Doesn’t matter what their sexuality is.

 

[phunterd]

A household with two parental figures is best. Doesn’t matter what their sexuality is.

Agree on the first. Disagree on the second. A child needs both a mother and a father. Not sure why that’s controversial.

 

[OHIO COLONEL]

View embedded media

Have basically quit watching college b'ball along with the NFL. Was bored yesterday and was flipping thru the channels so I thought I might watch a little of the St. Peter's/Murray game. They were in pregame warmups. Immediately changed the channel. Reminded me of why I quit watching.

 

[Nbacats]

Was the constitution of the USA written during the bible? Now who's being obtuse and making straw man arguments. The fact is that states have the right to set marriage standards. As long as homos have the same legal rights as heteros, in the legal sense, then changing the definition of a word is wrong. The same way we have changed the 1st amendment to mean that violence in OK under the first amendment if you oppose the right person but its totally illegal if you are for that person. Or the 2nd amendment says the government can't infringe our right to own a firearm but yet there are 33 states that impose huge restrictions on gun ownership.

Or how about 4th amendment rights.... We have the right to be secure in our houses, papers, persons and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures. Well the Jan 6 committee just asked tech co's for info on citizens without a warrant and they got it. Cops pull people out of their cars and search them with absolutely no reasonable presumption of a crime. The Obama doj got fisa warrants on the Trump campaign knowing that he didn't break any laws.

Or how about the 5th amendment?

View embedded media

View embedded media

Weird how dems can plead the 5th but Pubs are presumed guilty for asserting 5th amendment rights. Thats what changing definitions to fit a narrative leads to. I know you don't care because you don't actually care about the constitution as a document or its positives on the world and our lives.

The 2nd amendment has an important part you are forgetting, well regulated.

Letting everyone have guns without any regulations on it is not well regulated, that’s actually called lack of regulation.

Y’all gun nuts want to regulate the shit out of voting but don’t want any regulation on guns when the US is the gun violence capital of the world. Sad!

 

[P19978]

View embedded media

This is a major reason, imho, why the stock market is down so much YTD.

Investors get real nervous when they dont see an intelligent response to a problem (oil price shock).

i mean... do they REALLY think this is an actual solution?

 

[WildcatfaninOhio]

A household with two parental figures is best. Doesn’t matter what their sexuality is.

Agree 100%. And I’ll add that a child raised by either two moms or two dads is far, far, far better than a child raised in a group home (orphanage) or one bounced around to 8 different foster homes.

 

[WayneDougan]

Do liberals really not understand supply and demand?

 

[berniecarbo]

Globalist Agency Calls for Energy Lockdowns including Banning Cars on Sundays to Achieve Climate Goals | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

The globalist International Energy Agency (IEA) is calling for energy lockdowns as the price of gas and oil skyrockets.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

 

[Ron Mehico]

Agree on the first. Disagree on the second. A child needs both a mother and a father. Not sure why that’s controversial.

Unless there’s some sort of proof then it’s opinion at this point, and it’s fine for people to argue so vehemently about their opinions as long as there opinions don’t actually impose on other peoples freedoms, like the freedom to marry.

 

[trueblujr2]

View embedded media

Love how Bloomberg’s suggestions all fall lockstep with the narrative of the great reset.

 

[phunterd]

Unless there’s some sort of proof then it’s opinion at this point, and it’s fine for people to argue so vehemently about their opinions as long as there opinions don’t actually impose on other peoples freedoms, like the freedom to marry.

Where did I argue that gay marriage should be illegal?

 

[Sawnee Cat]

Who’s worse, Joe Biden or John Calipari?

That's a tough one man. They have the same philosophy and look for others to blame for their failures.

It may be a tie.

 

[Ron Mehico]

Where did I argue that gay marriage should be illegal?

I’m not saying you are, I’m just providing my opinion on the subject matter of the thread like you were

 

[TheFrontRunner]

 

[bigblueinsanity]

View embedded media

Can't believe he'll never be held accountable. Oh wait he's a lib so yes I can

 

[ukalumni00]

Love how the folks in the Western KY tornadoes finally got some FEMA help. Only took 3 months to help fellow Americans in desperate need (will take several more months before they see any of the money) yet our government can approve billions in funding to countries who do nothing for the US in just a few days and you know most of the money will never be accounted for.

 

[bigblueinsanity]

Ya we're f*cked if we have to go to war. Our fighting age kids can't even emotionally handle two other nations being at war on the other side of the world.

 

[bkingUK]

B

Was the constitution of the USA written during the bible? Now who's being obtuse and making straw man arguments. The fact is that states have the right to set marriage standards. As long as homos have the same legal rights as heteros, in the legal sense, then changing the definition of a word is wrong. The same way we have changed the 1st amendment to mean that violence in OK under the first amendment if you oppose the right person but its totally illegal if you are for that person. Or the 2nd amendment says the government can't infringe our right to own a firearm but yet there are 33 states that impose huge restrictions on gun ownership.

Or how about 4th amendment rights.... We have the right to be secure in our houses, papers, persons and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures. Well the Jan 6 committee just asked tech co's for info on citizens without a warrant and they got it. Cops pull people out of their cars and search them with absolutely no reasonable presumption of a crime. The Obama doj got fisa warrants on the Trump campaign knowing that he didn't break any laws.

Or how about the 5th amendment?

View embedded media

View embedded media

Weird how dems can plead the 5th but Pubs are presumed guilty for asserting 5th amendment rights. Thats what changing definitions to fit a narrative leads to. I know you don't care because you don't actually care about the constitution as a document or its positives on the world and our lives.

You some how jumped to FISA warrants and 5th amendment rights, but you never answered my simple question.

Ephesians 6:5-8 states:
“Slaves, be obedient to your human masters with fear and trembling, in sincerity of heart, as to Christ”

Is slavery wrong and should slaves be obedient to their masters?

 

[SDC888]

LOL my bROZSKYY!!!!

 

[AustinTXCat]

GREAT NEWS you MAGA sheep! Your resident PEDO queen will run for President in 24! You can put another Epstein wannabee in the WH! WINNING!

 

[TheFrontRunner]

All of these measures have to be taking a toll on Putin...how could he possibly survive much longer?

 

[JDHoss]

All other things equal, do you disagree that a heterosexual married household is the best environment for children to be raised in?

If all things are equal, it doesn't matter.

 

[OHIO COLONEL]

Ya we're f*cked if we have to go to war. Our fighting age kids don't even know there are only two sexes, and can't even emotionally handle two other nations being at war on the other side of the world.

FIFY

 

[bigblueinsanity]

Counterpoint - who do you think uses these services? It’s purple haired freaks, fat slovenly libs, and LGBQTLMNOP activists. Not exactly the people who would ever do the fighting.

Yes but the fact there are so many of those types now is the real problem. Our society created a throng of those people and now they're way too vast in number for us to be able to mount am effective defense if it comes to it