I respectfully disagree:
To me, she's a textbook example of bigotry.
Don't care about about what the women wear, but NO BACON??!!! A bridge too farWe're talking about government here, not church. There is a reason our constitution strictly separates them, and KD is the reason.
How would you like it if a strict Muslim was elected mayor of your city and demanded women wear burkhas while banning pork sales?
Well I am thankful she has opened her eyes because her people helped to put us in this situation. The mid term elections will tell us a lot. If her people vote 95% Democrat like they usually do then this sounds nice but is nothing but talk.That's a great American right there...
of all the great Americans, I think based black grandma might be my fav.
Now do lithium extraction for batteries.
* KA - BOOM *Oil has dropped 30% the last week, under $100 now. Gas hasn't moved down at all. Once again proving that the energy market is completely detached from all economic rules. The companies just do whatever the **** they want to gouge consumers because the legislatures are bought and paid for. Oil futures move up a bit and gas prices skyrocket instantly. futures fall back down and gas prices still go up, maybe go down a month later.
“It’s her truth” lolReally don’t care one way or the other, I wouldn’t call her a bigot she’s doing what she believes in. Just like BLM and Antifa, I wonder if those organizations will pay her legal expenses 😂😂🍺
Marriage is nothing more than than an official commitment to another individual. Heterosexuals are still free to reproduce with or without it and regardless of whether other types of commitments are recognized than their own.Notice the google definition states an unreasonable belief. So you don’t think there’s any reasonable argument that the predominant view of marriage is that it’s between a man and a woman?
- Tradition
- Religion
- Cultural
- Reproduction
- Child raising/family structure
If you think marriage can be whatever, that’s certainly your right. But it’s also not unreasonable to look at the above reasons and think that’s it’s best suited for a heterosexual relationship, particularly the reproductive angle.
I assume then you don't wear clothes made of multiple materials, purchase slaves, support the stoning to death of rebellious children, and also believe that handicapped people should be banned from church?Every decent person prior to 20 years ago thought homosexuality was a mental disorder and marriage was between a man and a woman. Now everyone who disagrees is a bigot. This is the relativity of morality without an immutable God as the standard.
It says OR, not ANDNotice the google definition states an unreasonable belief. So you don’t think there’s any reasonable argument that the predominant view of marriage is that it’s between a man and a woman?
- Tradition
- Religion
- Cultural
- Reproduction
- Child raising/family structure
If you think marriage can be whatever, that’s certainly your right. But it’s also not unreasonable to look at the above reasons and think that’s it’s best suited for a heterosexual relationship, particularly the reproductive angle.
This COVID cult is terrifying. I'm not kidding. These people are absolutely mentally broken.
Marriage is nothing more than than an official commitment to another individual.
BrEAkiNG NeWS!Strongly disagree. Look at the impact of nuclear family households vs single parent household on child performance in every metric.
Yeah… Which is why marriage is just more than a commitment to an individual…BrEAkiNG NeWS!
Children with stable family homes are generally more stable
But, but, but....how inhumane is that. For the murderer who maybe tortured his victim(s) before he killed them. We must think of HIS feelings.
OkYeah… Which is why marriage is just more than a commitment to an individual…
But the problem is that it’s none of your business how people raise their kids. And it’s not breaking news that stable environments are better for kids. And yea, I know plenty of gay people with kids and no big deal. Welcome to 2022Yeah… Which is why marriage is just more than a commitment to an individual…
40% now born out of wedlock, 28% in 1990. 70% or more in AA community. Direct correlation to poverty and the accompanying social ills.One can have a stable home environment with two parents without them needing to be married.
I mean we can talk why the African American community is further behind than the rest of society if you want but I’m not sure how that pertains to Kim Davis.40% now born out of wedlock, 28% in 1990. 70% or more in AA community. Direct correlation to poverty and the accompanying social ills.
She was wrong to bring her personal beliefs into her official position, but the destruction of marriage is maybe the main problem we have.
But the problem is that it’s none of your business how people raise their kids. And it’s not breaking news that stable environments are better for kids. And yea, I know plenty of gay people with kids and no big deal. Welcome to 2022