You have no idea what they will look like or even if their DNA will resemble elephants at all a billion years from now. And that's assuming they don't go extinct.
It's all hypothesis and conjecture. Claiming to know it all as a human here for 70-100 years is the epitome of arrogance.
Now that's funny - because your logic fails when applied to the sheer speculation of an evolutionary 'scientist' who claims to know what happened billions of years ago. You just shot your whole position in the head.
And it's the "height of arrogance" not the epitome. Learn English. But I do agree - evolutionists are the pinnacle of arrogance, denying God's existence but putting themselves in His place.
There is ZERO falsifiability with evolutionary genetics. But we DO KNOW that ZERO new information is created whenever there is a mutation. That is a scientific FACT. So all available science DISPROVES any evolutionary theory. Therefore your puppetmasters are forced to invent new, wild theories to try and explain it. Example: The so-called "Cambrian Explosion" is simply another way of saying "Creation" but leaving God out of it.
The math says there isn't enough time for evolution in genetics.
The genetic differences between organisms are mathematical show-stoppers for evolution. A simplistic comparison of human and chimpanzee DNA shows that the genetic divergence is at least 4%. (The difference is certainly much larger than this number which was derived from a technique not as precise as lining up sequences as in our example above. This “4% difference” does not take into account the different number of chromosomes in the two genomes, the different arrangement of genes among the chromosomes, and a lot of non-coding, but regulatory DNA that show significant variations. If you take these real issues into account, as you should, the divergence is 15 – 20%.)
But let’s assume the measly 4% often quoted. How big is 4% in the DNA? It doesn’t sound big, does it? But the human genome has the information content of one thousand 500-page books. A 4% change would be about 40 large books, equivalent to about 12,000,000 words. We are expected to believe that random mutation plus natural selection (
somehow driven by the right combinations of zillions of environmental changes) can generate 12 million words in a precisely meaningful sequence – just to get the “little” divergence between chimps and people.
But the evolutionist always says that “given enough time – millions and millions of years,” such miracles can happen. But evolutionists claim that human evolution would have taken place over the last 10 million years, with creatures like humans and apes sharing a common ancestor. Is that long enough? Note that a human generation is about 20 years. You have to hope very optimistically for rapid mutation and natural selection. In fact, detailed population genetics calculations have shown that only about 1700 mutations could arise in a population over a 10 million year period. That’s only a “page or two” out of the required 40 large books.
As IMPOSSIBLE as it is to go from raw materials to the first functional proteins, and as impossible as it is to go from at least hundreds of functional proteins to the wonderfully integrated system of a single cell,
the impossibilities are yet unimaginably greater to generate the information content of multicellular creatures, like “simple” invertebrates. And from there to fish, to amphibians, to reptiles, etc., the NEW INFORMATION CONTENT is ridiculously great, but must be generated by mutations and natural selection. Wow . . . what blind faith!